Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
#16
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
#17
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
|
#18
|
||
|
||
![]()
TOTV rules permit discussion of local politics and if you dont live in Sumter not every post has to be of interest to you.
|
#19
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
See Parts (f) and (g) below. ________________________ Florida Impact Fee Law 1163.31801 Impact fees; short title; intent; minimum requirements; audits; challenges.— (1) This section may be cited as the “Florida Impact Fee Act.” (2) The Legislature finds that impact fees are an important source of revenue for a local government to use in funding the infrastructure necessitated by new growth. The Legislature further finds that impact fees are an outgrowth of the home rule power of a local government to provide certain services within its jurisdiction. Due to the growth of impact fee collections and local governments’ reliance on impact fees, it is the intent of the Legislature to ensure that, when a county or municipality adopts an impact fee by ordinance or a special district adopts an impact fee by resolution, the governing authority complies with this section. (3) At a minimum, an impact fee adopted by ordinance of a county or municipality or by resolution of a special district must satisfy all of the following conditions: (a) The calculation of the impact fee must be based on the most recent and localized data. (b) The local government must provide for accounting and reporting of impact fee collections and expenditures. If a local governmental entity imposes an impact fee to address its infrastructure needs, the entity must account for the revenues and expenditures of such impact fee in a separate accounting fund. (c) Administrative charges for the collection of impact fees must be limited to actual costs. (d) The local government must provide notice not less than 90 days before the effective date of an ordinance or resolution imposing a new or increased impact fee. A county or municipality is not required to wait 90 days to decrease, suspend, or eliminate an impact fee. (e) Collection of the impact fee may not be required to occur earlier than the date of issuance of the building permit for the property that is subject to the fee. (f) The impact fee must be proportional and reasonably connected to, or have a rational nexus with, the need for additional capital facilities and the increased impact generated by the new residential or commercial construction. (g) The impact fee must be proportional and reasonably connected to, or have a rational nexus with, the expenditures of the funds collected and the benefits accruing to the new residential or nonresidential construct |
#20
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
The sweetheart impact fee was limited to road costs, and it does not cover other infrastructure necessitated by the Developer's massive expansion of The Villages. To give the Developer even more of a break, the impact fee was set at only 40% of the amount deemed appropriate by the 2019 study, which study, as indicated, was limited to road costs. If you want to see how understand how badly we are getting screwed, watch the video linked in my post and compare Sumter County with Collier County, a County where the Developer does not control the Commission. Our tax was increased by 25% for only one reason-- to put the amount thereof into the Developer's pocket by maintaining his sweetheart impact fee. If you are okay with that, fine, but understand what you are okay about. |
#21
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
It's available for any and all developers. I do understand and I'm fine with it. ![]()
__________________
Identifying as Mr. Helpful |
#22
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
Within Sumter County the impact fee is all the same for +55 Developers
__________________
Identifying as Mr. Helpful |
#23
|
||
|
||
![]()
But you didnt say that did you. And if you read Part A of the law it does not have to be be county wide either if there are special costs associated with a particular project.
|
#24
|
||
|
||
![]()
__________________
Identifying as Mr. Helpful |
#25
|
||
|
||
![]()
I suspect repeal will not happen once those that were voted in have the responsibility for their actions. I also suspect that by slowing down growth COSTCO will never come here
![]()
__________________
No one believes the truth when the lie is more interesting Berks County Pennsylvania |
#26
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
|
#27
|
||
|
||
![]()
So you say. And yet the infighting between the new Commissioners has already begun. Remember the parable about the goose who laid the golden eggs.
__________________
Roseville, MI, East Lansing, MI, Okemos, MI, Kapalua, HI, Village of Pine Ridge |
#28
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Birthdays Are Good For You. Statistics Show the More That You Have The Longer You Will Live.. We've Got Plenty Of Youth.. What We Need Is a Fountain Of SMART! |
#29
|
||
|
||
![]()
Retconning a necessary tax increase is foolish. But expecting NO tax increase at all, is equally foolish. There needs to be a tax increase. But I don't think it needed to be 25%. I think there were, and still are, other avenues to reach out to, for increased revenue. And more cost-efficient decisions the county could make toward saving more, spending less, and still providing service to the towns.
|
#30
|
||
|
||
![]()
I wouldn’t mind subsidizing the developers impact fees, if it was the impact caused by building lots of new Championship golf courses. However, I have absolutely no desire to subsidize the impact fees necessitated by building tens of thousands of new homes, and now apartment complexes as well.
Roll, roll, roll them back, or build more Championship golf, south of 44. Hmmm, sounds like a song I herd before. |
Closed Thread |
|
|