[ducati1974]

We currently have a 7 year old house in Virginia Trace and have sinkhole insurance coverage grandfathered in. If we change insurers we could save $200. per year but could no longer get the sinkhole coverage. Is it worth the risk? Have there been sinkholes in our area and does the fact that the house is 7 years old lessen the possibility of one?

[billethkid]

play the odds!
Do you have lightning rods on your home?
NO? In the lightning capital of the world?
Are lightning rods sorta/kinda like insurance, against lightning that is not likely to hit your house. If you have decided to play the odds about lightning and do not have them....then why not the same play for sink holes?
How many homes in TV have been affected by sink holes?
How many houses have been hit by lightning?

Me, I do not see a difference. I do not have lightning rods and do not have sink hole insurance......and both were conscious decions to NOT do either. This is also true for over 90% of our neighbors.

Gather the info...make an informed decision. Good luck.

btk

[Harleyman]

I think the real question you need to ask yourself is, if you go without the coverage and have a sinkhole appear on your property, and it destroys your home, can you not only afford to walk away from a total loss, plus I expect, be responsible for the cleanup and fixing the hole.


To me, there is no question what you should do for the sake of 200 per year. Keep the coverage. There are 1000's of sinkholes every year in Fla. Just because there have not been that many in TV does not mean that it is not going to start to be one of the problem areas.

Think of the things you waste 200 per year on and drop one of them to protect what you have worked all of your life for. Its a no brainer.

[Barefoot]

Originally Posted by ducati1974

We currently have a 7 year old house in Virginia Trace and have sinkhole insurance coverage grandfathered in. If we change insurers we could save $200. per year but could no longer get the sinkhole coverage. Is it worth the risk? Have there been sinkholes in our area and does the fact that the house is 7 years old lessen the possibility of one?

We have sinkhole insurance and wouldn't be without it. Presumably your home in Virginia Trace is one of your major assets. Why take a risk?

[OldDave]

See if I understand this correctly. If a sink hole eats your house or damages it to the point you cannot live in it, any homeowners insurance will cover it. You only need sinkhole insurance for cracking, minor damage or damage to the property not involving the dwelling. Do I have this right? I think I do from reading the laws in Florida but that doesn't seem to be what most people think.

If I'm correct, your exposure isn't as great if you drop it because you're still covered for catastrophy. Of course, I only think I understand this. If it was my house I'd never listen to an idiot like me, Good luck.

[janmcn]

Originally Posted by OldDave

See if I understand this correctly. If a sink hole eats your house or damages it to the point you cannot live in it, any homeowners insurance will cover it. You only need sinkhole insurance for cracking, minor damage or damage to the property not involving the dwelling. Do I have this right? I think I do from reading the laws in Florida but that doesn't seem to be what most people think.

If I'm correct, your exposure isn't as great if you drop it because you're still covered for catastrophy. Of course, I only think I understand this. If it was my house I'd never listen to an idiot like me, Good luck.

A sinkhole on your property that doesn't effect the home itself could cost tens of thousands of dollars to fill. This happened within the past year in Sunset Point.

If the increase were $5000 per year you might think about self-insuring, but for less than $20 per month it would be foolish to lose the insurance.

[Bill-n-Brillo]

ducati, you've gotta do what lets you sleep well at night. $200 saved is $200 in your pocket. But it's a small price to have paid if a problem should turn up.

It's like any other type of insurance - a complete and utter waste of money............until you need the coverage.

Do what seems right to you. JMHO......

Bill

[BobnBev]

Originally Posted by Harleyman

I think the real question you need to ask yourself is, if you go without the coverage and have a sinkhole appear on your property, and it destroys your home, can you not only afford to walk away from a total loss, plus I expect, be responsible for the cleanup and fixing the hole.


To me, there is no question what you should do for the sake of 200 per year. Keep the coverage. There are 1000's of sinkholes every year in Fla. Just because there have not been that many in TV does not mean that it is not going to start to be one of the problem areas.

Think of the things you waste 200 per year on and drop one of them to protect what you have worked all of your life for. Its a no brainer.

[tommy steam]

Originally Posted by ducati1974

We currently have a 7 year old house in Virginia Trace and have sinkhole insurance coverage grandfathered in. If we change insurers we could save $200. per year but could no longer get the sinkhole coverage. Is it worth the risk? Have there been sinkholes in our area and does the fact that the house is 7 years old lessen the possibility of one?

I just bought a new designer this month. I went to the insurance office in Brownwood and got homeowners ins. The sink hole part was 500 extra a year. While I was not happy about spending that extra money on it, I felt it was needed when living in this area. you know, an ounce of prevention....

[2BNTV]

Originally Posted by Bill-n-Brillo

ducati, you've gotta do what lets you sleep well at night. $200 saved is $200 in your pocket. But it's a small price to have paid if a problem should turn up.

It's like any other type of insurance - a complete and utter waste of money............until you need the coverage.

Do what seems right to you. JMHO......

Bill

I personally would be able to sleep at night if I stll had the coverage. To me, that is priceless.

[Cedwards38]

Less than $17.00 a month seems like a pretty cheap price to pay for peace of mind. I'd keep it.

[BarryRX]

Originally Posted by ducati1974

We currently have a 7 year old house in Virginia Trace and have sinkhole insurance coverage grandfathered in. If we change insurers we could save $200. per year but could no longer get the sinkhole coverage. Is it worth the risk? Have there been sinkholes in our area and does the fact that the house is 7 years old lessen the possibility of one?

it's really dependent on your personality. Some people would buy meteorite insurance if it was available. I believe that sinkholes are a very real possibility in central Florida. I went out with friends the other night and spent $200 on sushi. I think it is quite reasonable to spend $200 on sinkhole insurance.

[hook line sinker]

Sink hole insurance....darn glad I had it. Last April cracks and wall separation were forming in our six year new designer home. Our insurance adjuster suspected sink hole damage. He contacted a engineering firm. We finally received the complete engineers report this mid November. Unusual as it may sound, the report advised against attempting to repair (pier/grout) the structure as the cost would most likely exceed the value of the house. The insurance company quickly made the settled. Despite my effort, TV was not interested in taking back the house. Citizens got the check. I found an investor, he got a deal. Citizens got the best part of that check. Too! Six years ago The Villages caught me by hook, line, and now sinker. I would be much worse off had it not been for the insurance.

[perrjojo]

Originally Posted by hook line sinker

Sink hole insurance....darn glad I had it. Last April cracks and wall separation were forming in our six year new designer home. Our insurance adjuster suspected sink hole damage. He contacted a engineering firm. We finally received the complete engineers report this mid November. Unusual as it may sound, the report advised against attempting to repair (pier/grout) the structure as the cost would most likely exceed the value of the house. The insurance company quickly made the settled. Despite my effort, TV was not interested in taking back the house. Citizens got the check. I found an investor, he got a deal. Citizens got the best part of that check. Too! Six years ago The Villages caught me by hook, line, and now sinker. I would be much worse off had it not been for the insurance.

Curious as to what area your house was located

[janmcn]

Originally Posted by hook line sinker

Sink hole insurance....darn glad I had it. Last April cracks and wall separation were forming in our six year new designer home. Our insurance adjuster suspected sink hole damage. He contacted a engineering firm. We finally received the complete engineers report this mid November. Unusual as it may sound, the report advised against attempting to repair (pier/grout) the structure as the cost would most likely exceed the value of the house. The insurance company quickly made the settled. Despite my effort, TV was not interested in taking back the house. Citizens got the check. I found an investor, he got a deal. Citizens got the best part of that check. Too! Six years ago The Villages caught me by hook, line, and now sinker. I would be much worse off had it not been for the insurance.

If you had not had sink hole insurance, you would be on the hook for the total cost of repairs since the house was never condemned, meaning your property insurance would not pay for the damage...correct?

What's to prevent the investor who bought the house from turning around and selling it to some unsuspecting buyer?