Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, General Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/)
-   -   No more wal-mart cart trail? (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/no-more-wal-mart-cart-trail-205736/)

outlaw 08-16-2016 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rustyp (Post 1272572)
In hindsight whoever did the upgrading to this path which was an extensive amount of work must not have had Duke's permission. That is an assumption before we go down the garden path. If true they bought this situation onto themselves.

If they did not have Duke's permission to do the extensive upgrades (and it appears that they didn't), I'm amazed at their arrogance and disregard of property rights. All I can figure is that someone in this group thought if they spent a period of time maintaining the property, they could claim in the future that they have access across the property through adverse possession. I believe the obvious liability issue along with the adverse possession issue is why Duke has acted.

Bogie Shooter 08-16-2016 07:45 AM

Information(factual) that has never been provided regarding the infamous trail.
How much cart traffic is northbound versus southbound?

dewilson58 08-16-2016 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by outlaw (Post 1272615)
All I can figure is that someone in this group thought if they spent a period of time maintaining the property, they could claim in the future that they have access across the property through adverse possession. I believe the obvious liability issue along with the adverse possession issue is why Duke has acted.

08.16.16...........I have to write this date down. Ok, got it.

I agree.

ColdNoMore 08-16-2016 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by outlaw (Post 1272611)
I was raised to have empathy for others.

Me too (disregarding my sometimes warped sense of humor :D ), but don't you realize that those 20-30 extra carts a day from Stonecrest will clog and destroy the MMP's in TV? :loco:

graciegirl 08-16-2016 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColdNoMore (Post 1272606)
That's pretty obvious.

More house for the same money.

Had we just wanted to live in this area of Florida and weren't interested in the plethora of activities and amenities (especially the variety of championship golf courses)...we wouldn't have chosen TV.

Any way you slice it, TV houses cost more per SF and you get less yard than in other nearby areas.

We bought based on the entire TV lifestyle, not for the house/land size. :shrug:



Wellllll..........there you have it.

Regor 08-16-2016 08:47 AM

The only place that would really notice any increase in cart traffic is the bridge over 441 and Paradise Drive. After the bridge everyone spreads out to their destinations. I would much rather have golf carts in the parking areas than cars! You can get 4 carts in where it is parallel parking and 2 where it angle parking. Have you ever been to the town squares and had to park a long ways away? What would it be like if it was all carts? The non-Village people are STILL going to come here for the shopping and entertainment.

More cars, more traffic. Isn't Morse Blvd, 441 & 466 busy enough?

Allegiance 08-16-2016 08:55 AM

Believe it or not there are people living in the villages on a meager fixed income and choose not to have a car, they get to Walmart for cheap provisions and prescriptions via Golf cart. I feel for them. Some villagers, although not many, work in walmart and do not drive a car. They will be out of luck and a job.

Rollie 08-16-2016 09:02 AM

Also, isn't that the reason the wall came down.

Rollie

spring_chicken 08-16-2016 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Regor (Post 1272684)
The only place that would really notice any increase in cart traffic is the bridge over 441 and Paradise Drive. After the bridge everyone spreads out to their destinations. I would much rather have golf carts in the parking areas than cars! You can get 4 carts in where it is parallel parking and 2 where it angle parking. Have you ever been to the town squares and had to park a long ways away? What would it be like if it was all carts? The non-Village people are STILL going to come here for the shopping and entertainment.

More cars, more traffic. Isn't Morse Blvd, 441 & 466 busy enough?

BINGO! I absolutely HATE 441. I can literally get to wal-mart quicker by cart even though I go a mile out of the way using the cart bridge.
A LOT of those carts parked in the wal-mart lot will now be more freaking cars going 35 in a 45 on Hwy 441. UGH.

tophcfa 08-16-2016 11:04 AM

So I understand, can Villagers still get to Lowes but not Walmart by golf cart? If that is the case, Villagers still can get to both by golf cart by driving to the Buffalo Ridge Walmart, although a longer ride for many. I know that does not help the people who commute to their job by golf cart at the Walmart near Lowes. Never been to Aldi so can't comment on that.

NoMoSno 08-16-2016 11:22 AM

...and when Mr. Brown shuts down his path, due to liability, Harbor Chase will be the only destination.

TVMayor 08-16-2016 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter (Post 1272617)
Information(factual) that has never been provided regarding the infamous trail.
How much cart traffic is northbound versus southbound?

Disregarding 911 events, if all carts returned home, northbound and southbound would be equal. That would be my wild guess. :22yikes:

debow 08-16-2016 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by outlaw (Post 1272615)
If they did not have Duke's permission to do the extensive upgrades (and it appears that they didn't), I'm amazed at their arrogance and disregard of property rights. All I can figure is that someone in this group thought if they spent a period of time maintaining the property, they could claim in the future that they have access across the property through adverse possession. I believe the obvious liability issue along with the adverse possession issue is why Duke has acted.

Maybe Duke put the sign up to protect against liability. If they really want to block cart traffic, a sign won't work.

jebartle 08-16-2016 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rubicon (Post 1272291)
Bring back the wall

and Mexico will pay for it!

Bogie Shooter 08-16-2016 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter (Post 1272617)
Information(factual) that has never been provided regarding the infamous trail.
How much cart traffic is northbound versus southbound?

Quote:

Originally Posted by TVMayor (Post 1272772)
Disregarding 911 events, if all carts returned home, northbound and southbound would be equal. That would be my wild guess. :22yikes:

To be more clear. Are there more carts from TV visiting Walmart, than there are Stonecrest carts visiting TV.

Topspinmo 08-16-2016 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by debow (Post 1272791)
Maybe Duke put the sign up to protect against liability. If they rveally want to block cart traffic, a sign won't work.

Agreed. The sign not going to stop traffic. Done to protect against lawsuits When someone tried to sue, they'll have ace in they're pocket. Only way to stop traffic would be gate and lock.

Signs only stop law bidding people or people that's not special.

TVMayor 08-16-2016 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter (Post 1272803)
To be more clear. Are there more carts from TV visiting Walmart, than there are Stonecrest carts visiting TV.

If I was on a quiz program, my answer would be more carts from TV visit Walmart than Stonecrest carts visit TV. Because you need a card to open the gate to get into TV, no red button.

kcrazorbackfan 08-16-2016 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bagboy (Post 1272416)
The owner of the property has posted a No Trespassing sign. They do not want anyone crossing their property. That should be that.

To any of you that cross that boundary of Duke Energy's "no trespassing" sign, would you want anyone crossing into an area that you deemed no trespassing? Didn't think so.

JoelJohnson 08-16-2016 02:32 PM

Did Duke put up that sign, or someone's joke?

JoMar 08-16-2016 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 1272357)
I can't figure out if you are a Villager or a Stonecrester or how you stand exactly. I stand for the wall. We have enough people who live here driving golf carts. Perhaps a couple too many according to some.

Actually we have too many driving cars.

justjim 08-16-2016 03:46 PM

Ironically residents that live on the Historical side of TV and in that area get their electricity from Duke Energy. For years golf carts passed through Duke's property so customers of Duke could go to work, buy groceries, and get needed pharmacy supplies. Suddenly and without notice a no trespassing sign appears. One would wonder why they would treat their good customers in this manner. Was this cart path really that big of a liability issue? Really? Or is something else the problem here? Does Duke Energy "care" about the residents (their good customers) and what hardships this decision might cause? It appears Duke Energy has the power in more ways than one. Just a thought.

chuckinca 08-16-2016 04:07 PM

Might be Duke trying to entice Walmart to buy the trail thru the Duke property.

.

chuckinca 08-16-2016 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoMoSno (Post 1272770)
...and when Mr. Brown shuts down his path, due to liability, Harbor Chase will be the only destination.

I believe Mr Brown (a cousin of the Morse's) sold his property to the Morse's a couple years ago. Maybe the Morse's will shut down that portion of the path between Harbor Chase and the Lowe's etc shopping area.

.

ColdNoMore 08-16-2016 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by debow (Post 1272791)
Maybe Duke put the sign up to protect against liability. If they really want to block cart traffic, a sign won't work.

Yep, that's my take on it.

They simply put a sign up to mitigate their liability.

After all, it would be very inexpensive to really stop golf cart traffic.

In about 30 minutes, a backhoe could dig a trench/berm across the trail that would stop even 4X4 ATV's from traversing the trail...if they had truly wanted to physically stop carts. :shrug:

RickeyD 08-16-2016 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColdNoMore (Post 1272948)
Yep, that's my take on it.

They simply put a sign up to mitigate their liability.

After all, it would be very inexpensive to really stop golf cart traffic.

In about 30 minutes, a backhoe could dig a trench/berm across the trail that would stop even 4X4 ATV's from traversing the trail...if they had truly wanted to physically stop carts. :shrug:

A neighbor of mine up north who also happens to service my oil furnace told me of his no trespassing signs that a fat neighbor woman traversed, sued him and won because she tripped on his property and broke her ankle. Signs don't mean ****.

ColdNoMore 08-16-2016 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RickeyD (Post 1272950)
A neighbor of mine up north who also happens to service my oil furnace told me of his no trespassing signs that a fat neighbor woman traversed, sued him and won because she tripped on his property and broke her ankle. Signs don't mean ****.

I don't doubt that it might occasionally happen whereby someone is still successfully sued with signs up (I would be curious as to what they based their successful lawsuit on, as I'm not sure you got the whole story from your neighbor :shrug: ), but I also know of many companies/entities that have avoided lawsuits because they installed no trespassing signs.

Trespass in Structure or Conveyance- Florida | Criminal Law

Quote:


2) Trespass on Property Other Than a Structure or Conveyance- this type of trespass occurs where a person who, without being authorized, licensed, or invited, willfully enters upon or remains in any property other than a structure or conveyance. The elements that must be proven at trial for this offense are as follows:

- The defendant willfully entered upon or remained in the property alleged;

- The property was owned by or in the lawful possession of the person/entity claiming the trespass;

- Notice not to enter upon or remain in that property had been given by either actual communication or by posting, cultivation, or fencing on the property, and

- The defendant’s entering upon or remaining in the property was without the permission, express or implied, of the person or entity claiming the trespass or any other person authorized to give that permission. See Section 810.09, Florida Statutes.

The phrase “posted land” is legally defined as land upon which signs are placed not more than 500 feet apart along and at each corner of the property’s boundaries. The signs must prominently display (in letters not less than 2 inches high) the words “No Trespassing” and must, in smaller letters, state the owner, lessee, or occupant of the land.

However, if the property is less than five acres in area, and a dwelling house is located on it, the property will automatically be treated as “posted land” even though no signs have been erected.


Cajulian 08-16-2016 05:41 PM

:wave:

Cajulian 08-16-2016 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuckinca (Post 1272929)
Might be Duke trying to entice Walmart to buy the trail thru the Duke property.

.

There was already discussion on this very topic going on between Walmart and Duke over a year ago. It looked like they were going to come to an agreement until the wall and then gate went up.

outlaw 08-17-2016 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by debow (Post 1272791)
Maybe Duke put the sign up to protect against liability. If they really want to block cart traffic, a sign won't work.

This may be the first step. A fence may be next.

Rapscallion St Croix 08-17-2016 08:06 AM

My yard man told me the scoop on this. I used Google Translator to put his words into English. It seems that the evil ones who run The Villages...I think they are collectively known as "They".....were sitting around drinking brandy and smoking illegal Cuban cigars, when Janet Tutt said she wished there were a way to deflect some of the daily criticism she receives. One of the minions who runs The Villages sign painting operation, suggested they use a ploy whereby another institution appears to do something so dastardly that Janet gets a few days respite. There you have it.

justjim 08-17-2016 08:33 AM

The only ones really harmed by this are the residents that only have the use of their golf carts as a means of transportation. Others can use their cars. That said, they can use the bridge over 441 for grocery and pharmacy medications. That said, it was a convenience and perhaps for a few a means to get to doctors and to work. One can only wonder how many fall into this category of being really "harmed" by this so called "liability issue" or whatever has caused this problem. I can completely understand the frustration of all (even the stone cresters) who wonder---really what is the big deal here.

kstew43 08-17-2016 09:22 AM

just wanted to mention....if anyone knew this or not....but...we had friends visit and they rented a golf cart for $21 for 24 hours from the villages golf cart store.

so non-villagers can rent a golf cart anytime they choose, for a very low amount and use the paths that...we pay for...

so I really don't see the difference.....with stone crest using the paths as well....

either way.....homeowners see no profits from others using the property we supposedly financially support...

biker1 08-17-2016 09:32 AM

I think the important point is that they were your guests and you pay to maintain the MMPs. Just like your guests can use the pools, rec centers, and executive courses, that you pay to maintain. The people in Stonecrest are not your guests.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstew43 (Post 1273240)
just wanted to mention....if anyone knew this or not....but...we had friends visit and they rented a golf cart for $21 for 24 hours from the villages golf cart store.

so non-villagers can rent a golf cart anytime they choose, for a very low amount and use the paths that...we pay for...

so I really don't see the difference.....with stone crest using the paths as well....

either way.....homeowners see no profits from others using the property we supposedly financially support...


NotGolfer 08-17-2016 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rapscallion St Croix (Post 1273199)
My yard man told me the scoop on this. I used Google Translator to put his words into English. It seems that the evil ones who run The Villages...I think they are collectively known as "They".....were sitting around drinking brandy and smoking illegal Cuban cigars, when Janet Tutt said she wished there were a way to deflect some of the daily criticism she receives. One of the minions who runs The Villages sign painting operation, suggested they use a ploy whereby another institution appears to do something so dastardly that Janet gets a few days respite. There you have it.

Thank you for giving a good chuckle!!! That said, I can understand the frustration of folks for sure. I'd bet just as many Villagers use that trail, as do Stonecresters. But the utility has a right to put up such signs. It has nothing to do with our developer.

Allegiance 08-17-2016 10:41 AM

The signs are on either side of the path, and observation today indicates interpretation is that it means stay on the path. It's business as usual and everyone is happy.

dewilson58 08-17-2016 10:45 AM

That's funny.

DrThunder 08-17-2016 11:58 AM

If Walmart, Aldies, & Lowes would just agree to pay that % of revenue to TV that the other merchants do, we'd have none of these problems on that side of the road.

Personally, I'd be willing to pay an extra annual fee to TV for a Golf Cart sticker to have access to that Walmart etc. and a maintained path. It's always about $, so a reasonable fee for TV residents and the other communities would probably make everybody happy and a little more money in the Morse family's coffers which is always important. You know the merchants love the business and those that use it wouldn't mind a small fee. Not so different than a toll or paying for parking.

Instead, we have to pretend it's about all these other issues when it's just profits. No different than paying a parking fee. For that matter, why not sell access to TV amenities for the surrounding communities as well? No different than joining a country club. Price it high enough so that you don't get riffraff and make money to boot. Keeps the monthly fee for TV residents lower too. Problems solved!

Villageswimmer 08-17-2016 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justjim (Post 1272924)
Ironically residents that live on the Historical side of TV and in that area get their electricity from Duke Energy. For years golf carts passed through Duke's property so customers of Duke could go to work, buy groceries, and get needed pharmacy supplies. Suddenly and without notice a no trespassing sign appears. One would wonder why they would treat their good customers in this manner. Was this cart path really that big of a liability issue? Really? Or is something else the problem here? Does Duke Energy "care" about the residents (their good customers) and what hardships this decision might cause? It appears Duke Energy has the power in more ways than one. Just a thought.


Has any Duke customer called to ask?

kstew43 08-17-2016 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biker1 (Post 1273246)
I think the important point is that they were your guests and you pay to maintain the MMPs. Just like your guests can use the pools, rec centers, and executive courses, that you pay to maintain. The people in Stonecrest are not your guests.

Actually, these particular friends of ours rent golf carts all the time.....long before we ever became friends....they said they enjoy driving around the squares and homes just for the heck of it.....as long as the cart is back before 8:30 when the store closes...so

I still stand behind.....anyone...with out any qualifications....can rent a golf cart from villages golf carts and use the paths,

Friends of residents or not....

biker1 08-17-2016 12:23 PM

Nobody is arguing the point that anyone can rent a golf cart and drive around on the MMP paths - there is no way to prevent that. You said you didn't see the issue with residents of Stonecrest having access to the MMP paths. I see an issue with that. They don't pay to maintain them so they shouldn't be granted access. Just like we don't grant them access to the pools, rec centers, or executive golf courses which are all maintained by the fees you pay to the CDD.


Quote:

Originally Posted by kstew43 (Post 1273338)
Actually, these particular friends of ours rent golf carts all the time.....long before we ever became friends....they said they enjoy driving around the squares and homes just for the heck of it.....as long as the cart is back before 8:30 when the store closes...so

I still stand behind.....anyone...with out any qualifications....can rent a golf cart from villages golf carts and use the paths,

Friends of residents or not....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.