Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, General Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/)
-   -   No more wal-mart cart trail? (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/no-more-wal-mart-cart-trail-205736/)

ColdNoMore 08-18-2016 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justjim (Post 1274110)
Apparently none of the posters on this Thread are current customers of Duke Energy. If you are, call them for an interpretation of the posted signs. Let us know what you find out.

I would advise against that.

The only thing 'they' can tell you (if 'they' are smart)...is that the signs speak for themselves.

I think the smarter course of action would be for those who use it, to continue to do so, keep quiet and wait until such time (if it happens) until access is physically blocked...or folks start getting tickets.

Sleeping dogs and all that.

That's my $.02 on it. :shrug:

Allegiance 08-18-2016 06:09 PM

Duke has great lawyers, under no circumstances will they tell people "go ahead use your golf carts across our property." They will close it off one day a year or when necessary to avoid adverse possession.

Allegiance 08-18-2016 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColdNoMore (Post 1274123)
I would advise against that.

The only thing 'they' can tell you (if 'they' are smart)...is that the signs speak for themselves.

I think the smarter course of action would be for those who use it, to continue to do so, keep quiet and wait until such time (if it happens) until access is physically blocked...or folks start getting tickets.

Sleeping dogs and all that.

That's my $.02 on it. :shrug:

I agree, from now on I treat this like "fight club."

Cajulian 08-18-2016 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuckinca (Post 1274074)
I believe it was last year that Duke installed a fence that blocked access. Believe it was taken down by them the same day.

Why the sign and not a new fence?

.

Duke has never installed a fence and then taken it down. The only wall that was put up was where the gate now sits at Paradise. The wall was forced to be taken down within a few days of it being put up. Villagers protested in Spanish Springs that year and the wall came down.

graciegirl 08-18-2016 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajulian (Post 1274169)
Duke has never installed a fence and then taken it down. The only wall that was put up was where the gate now sits at Paradise. The wall was forced to be taken down within a few days of it being put up. Villagers protested in Spanish Springs that year and the wall came down.

Well...The wall is still there and it has a reading device that allows Villagers in and out and everyone else is allowed out if they are driving a golf cart except for those who live on the outside with street legal carts.

NoMoSno 08-18-2016 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajulian (Post 1274169)
Duke has never installed a fence and then taken it down. The only wall that was put up was where the gate now sits at Paradise. The wall was forced to be taken down within a few days of it being put up. Villagers protested in Spanish Springs that year and the wall came down.

Yes, in 2012 it was fenced.
https://www.talkofthevillages.com/fo...ht=duke+energy

chuckinca 08-18-2016 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 1274172)
Well...The wall is still there and it has a reading device that allows Villagers in and out and everyone else is allowed out if they are driving a golf cart except for those who live on the outside with street legal carts.


The wall isn't still there.

.

rubicon 08-19-2016 05:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Topspinmo (Post 1272814)
Agreed. The sign not going to stop traffic. Done to protect against lawsuits When someone tried to sue, they'll have ace in they're pocket. Only way to stop traffic would be gate and lock.

Signs only stop law bidding people or people that's not special.

topspinmo: Perhaps the no trespassing sign is the first step? Posters may not be aware that this act is to make it clear as to the status of people as either invitees or trespassers. By virtue of the fact that people have been using this trail for years without such a notice posted Duke energy maybe in the position of acting as if they accepted golf cart drivers as invitees. So they decide for liability purposes to post the no trespassing sign. If the abuse continues then perhaps they will go to the next step and erect a gate.

I really can't blame them because Energy Companies are a huge target for lawsuits. Let me give you an actual case. A thief was trying to extract copper from a utility station got electrified lost two arms and a jury awarded him millions

Posters here are demanding rights they do not really have due to their personal circumstances. How far should one go to accommodate? We all make choices and if we do not want to live with them then decisions have to be made.

when I first got here I was at a deli when I guy approached me and asked if I lived in TV. I said yes and he literally laughed in my face and said I bought in Stonecrest got a better deal, etc and still got the villages lifestyle. I'll admit that conversation stuck in my crawl.

A poster mentioned that villagers are welcome to Stonecrest. Of course who is going to turn down business. Stonecrest people have access to anything in the village commercial district..its public Its the remainder that's in question and paid for exclusively by residents of TV and that's were the rub comes in

Resident pay premium prices for homes and incur monthly fees to live here. they made their choice and as the community grows so does the crowding. Come September morning that reality is going to begin to hit us in the face again.

dewilson58 08-19-2016 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuckinca (Post 1274279)
The wall isn't still there.

.

The card reader. The card reader. This limits access "like" a wall.

Duh.

JoelJohnson 08-19-2016 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Allegiance (Post 1273981)
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/2016...719ddddfbd.jpg

Picture coming from Walmart, signs are closer to this path entrance, about 50 feet. Notice mph sign in middle of no trespassing signs on either side of path.

I think the signs are there to keep people ON the path and away from the other property. The fenced in area should be safe, unless someone climbs the fence. The other property is easy to get to, but I doubt they want anyone near it because of the power station.

PennBF 08-19-2016 08:01 AM

What the Heck
 
What the heck. We drove our cart to Lowe's yesterday, over the cart path. There were no signs and nothing has changed? Where are the signs everybody is talking about. Gate worked fine.:ho:

Riccckkk 08-19-2016 08:35 AM

This is the path between Aldies and Walmart, not the one on the path on the way to Lowes.

looneycat 08-19-2016 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoelJohnson (Post 1274381)
I think the signs are there to keep people ON the path and away from the other property. The fenced in area should be safe, unless someone climbs the fence. The other property is easy to get to, but I doubt they want anyone near it because of the power station.

no trespassing is not a keep on the path sign. tickets are not the usual result, arrests are.

justjim 08-19-2016 09:02 AM

A thoughtful post
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JoelJohnson (Post 1274381)
I think the signs are there to keep people ON the path and away from the other property. The fenced in area should be safe, unless someone climbs the fence. The other property is easy to get to, but I doubt they want anyone near it because of the power station.

There you have it. As thoughtful an explanation as we are going to get. Fore!

Barefoot 08-19-2016 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoelJohnson (Post 1274381)
I think the signs are there to keep people ON the path and away from the other property.

Quote:

Originally Posted by looneycat (Post 1274421)
no trespassing is not a keep on the path sign. tickets are not the usual result, arrests are.

If they wanted to allow open access, wouldn't Duke have posted "Keep on the Path" signs rather than "No Trespassing" signs?

outlaw 08-19-2016 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justjim (Post 1274429)
There you have it. As thoughtful an explanation as we are going to get. Fore!

Thoughtful...hmmm. Wishful...definitely.

silvertoken 08-20-2016 11:37 AM

2 Attachment(s)
[ATTACH]Attachment 61597[/ATTACH]


Stonecrest would simply like what was advertised when you buy a house here.

rubicon 08-20-2016 02:45 PM

Without a sign posted people entering duke energy property who are not invitees are then classified as trespassers. An invitee is a customer, a supplier, etc if you have no business there then you are trespassing. the posting of the sign only solidifies that fact and in event of a lawsuit closes that questionable gap.

One poster made mention of the roads in TV as being public and hence cart paths also. what he was referring do was the diamond lanes that run parallel to the public roads. The multi-modal paths are private however. Again I say the bone of contention on this issue is simply a matter of geography. Everyone has access to the commercial districts public squares restaurants shops ,etc. However the difference of opinion is directed at the individual districts 1-11 + and the cart paths used as access.

We each make our economic choices. Some are pleased some have buyers remorse but others shouldn't have to suffer because of others poor or not well reasoned decisions. Its called life


silvertoken 08-20-2016 03:25 PM

The Best explaination
James Radatz says on Thevillages-news.com

August 16, 2016 at 10:56
The path is north of the historic side, between ALDI and Walmart. The path is used daily by about 200 carts, mostly of which are TV residents going to Walmart, $Tree and other businesses including restaurants, auto parts store, Humana, doctors offices etc, located on the west side of 441. All accessed by using this path as only one piece of their daily route. Spruce Creek and Stonecrest residents get to Aldi, Lowes, Doctor offices etc, located South of this path. Hopefully, the signs were posted as a C.Y.A. for Duke.

Allegiance 08-20-2016 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silvertoken (Post 1275323)
The Best explaination
James Radatz says on Thevillages-news.com

August 16, 2016 at 10:56
The path is north of the historic side, between ALDI and Walmart. The path is used daily by about 200 carts, mostly of which are TV residents going to Walmart, $Tree and other businesses including restaurants, auto parts store, Humana, doctors offices etc, located on the west side of 441. All accessed by using this path as only one piece of their daily route. Spruce Creek and Stonecrest residents get to Aldi, Lowes, Doctor offices etc, located South of this path. Hopefully, the signs were posted as a C.Y.A. for Duke.

"other businesses including restaurants, auto parts store, Humana, doctors offices etc, located on the west side of 441."

How do you get west of 441?

chuckinca 08-20-2016 03:55 PM

Walmart, $Tree and other businesses including restaurants, auto parts store, Humana, doctors offices etc, located on the west side of 441.

These places are all on the NorthEAST side of 441/27 -
(There are restaurants and doctor offices on both sides of the road but only the ones on he east side are cart accessible.)

The poster made a minor direction error.

.

Allegiance 08-20-2016 03:57 PM

Thanks. It's news to me, I did not realize there were more stores past the dollar store! I thought that other path went to that other development stonesomething

chuckinca 08-20-2016 04:23 PM

There is a cart path between Walmart and the Dollar Store that goes to a Stonecrest residents cart gate.

There is a road mainly owned by the Stonecrest developer between the Dollar Store and the Murphy (Walmart) gas station the goes parallel to 441 for about a half mile that has many businesses on it. At one intersection with a stop light on 441 residents of Spruce Creek South have obtained State, Marion County and Stonecrest permission to cross 441 in carts and use the road to get to Walmart etc.

Allegiance 08-20-2016 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuckinca (Post 1275369)
There is a cart path between Walmart and the Dollar Store that goes to a Stonecrest residents cart gate.

There is a road between the Dollar Store and the Murphy (Walmart) gas station the goes parallel to 441 for about a half mile that has many businesses on it. At one intersection with a stop light on 441 residents of Spruce Creek South have obtained State and Marion County permission to cross 441 in carts.

Can villagers access that area and cross 441?

NoMoSno 08-20-2016 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Allegiance (Post 1275374)
Can villagers access that area and cross 441?

Yes, If you want to enter Spruce Creek, for golf.

Allegiance 08-20-2016 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoMoSno (Post 1275376)
Yes, If you want to enter Spruce Creek, for golf.

So hypothetically you say you are entering for golf, then you can access the other stores, auto parts etc and cross 441?

What is across 441?

Sorry for all the questions. ;) thank you

NoMoSno 08-20-2016 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Allegiance (Post 1275377)
So hypothetically you say you are entering for golf, then you can access the other stores, auto parts etc and cross 441?

You can leave SCS, but would need to cross back at Mc Donalds, 441
Street legal, no problem.
There is no Auto Parts store on the west side.

Allegiance 08-20-2016 04:42 PM

With a non street legal cart is it possible for a villager to access the autoparts or cross 441?

NoMoSno 08-20-2016 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Allegiance (Post 1275384)
With a non street legal cart is it possible for a villager to access the autoparts or cross 441?

Until Duke fences the Walmart path again, Yes.
The auto parts store is on the east side, no need to cross 441.

chuckinca 08-20-2016 05:11 PM

Spruce Creek South has a vehicle gate that accesses the stores on the west side of 441 by McDonalds, CVS, Sam St John, Office Depot, 441 Urgent Care, doctor offices, etc. There are designated parking spaces in that shopping area for carts but I haven't ever seen a cart in one.

.

NoMoSno 08-20-2016 05:16 PM

...

chuckinca 08-21-2016 08:57 AM

Plenty of interest in the cart path to/from 441 Walmart etc.

150 replies and 9,992 views in 5 days!

.

asianthree 08-21-2016 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuckinca (Post 1275635)
Plenty of interest in the cart path to/from 441 Walmart etc.

150 replies and 9,992 views in 5 days!

.

Lots of readers, not many reply's.

Barefoot 08-21-2016 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by asianthree (Post 1275681)
Lots of readers, not many reply's.

150 replies = a very active thread. :posting:
Number of page views may be the same people checking for new responses.

Allegiance 08-21-2016 10:47 AM

The bottom line is, it has been business as usual on the paths. Might be time to close the thread.

I propose the rules of the Walmart path.....

Welcome to Fight Club - YouTube

sdeikenberry 08-22-2016 04:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spring_chicken (Post 1272268)
I wouldn't hold my breath on that. They don't want us going over there anyway! Remember the wall?

I don't think it's them not wanting us to go over there, I think its them not wanting non-villagers coming over here...that's the reason for the wall IMHO.

nicoletta 08-22-2016 07:06 AM

wal-mart trail confusion
 
I would not worry about the trail closing for the following reasons.
1) recent paved trail would indicate further long term use expected
2) I observed no trespassing sign on the left of the entrance into Wally- world ( heading North) the signs were positioned to avoid I believe anyone entering onto Duke property OFF the trail..then a couple of days later I observed that those signs were removed and a new sign metal pole on left heading south , a more permanent sign fixture stating No trespassing that looks to avoid anyone from entering the trail not just the Duke property , so I understand the confusion. as the new sign appears more prohibited. now the scoop. is as follows .. Wal-Mart owns the retention pond and the property , and the trail.. spoken to me by management whom I know..
furthermore
a person has died from entering the Duke property and was electro0cuted to death and this may be a contributor .. also note I have been on this property many many times at night and know that there is a camper that has been there for at least 6 months not continuous but the better part of six months .. amazing what you see when you walk I observed light from cell phone thru tent and investigated and there was a campers couple and that was six months ago and they have remained
so if you think that Duke was serious ..wouldn't they remove the camper tent know as tent city by Wal-Mart that is actually on Duke property,cute comments though trail will remain I am very sure

graciegirl 08-22-2016 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nicoletta (Post 1276067)
I would not worry about the trail closing for the following reasons.
1) recent paved trail would indicate further long term use expected
2) I observed no trespassing sign on the left of the entrance into Wally- world ( heading North) the signs were positioned to avoid I believe anyone entering onto Duke property OFF the trail..then a couple of days later I observed that those signs were removed and a new sign metal pole on left heading south , a more permanent sign fixture stating No trespassing that looks to avoid anyone from entering the trail not just the Duke property , so I understand the confusion. as the new sign appears more prohibited. now the scoop. is as follows .. furthermore
a person has died from entering the Duke property and was electro0cuted to death and this may be a co Walntributor .. also note I have been on this property many many times at night and know that there is a camper that has been there for at least 6 months not-WalMart owns the retention pond and the property , and the trail.. spoken to me by management whom I know..
continuous but the better part of six months .. amazing what you see when you walk I observed light from cell phone thru tent and investigated and there was a campers couple and that was six months ago and they have remained
so if you think that Duke was serious ..wouldn't they remove the camper tent know as tent city by Wal-Mart that is actually on Duke property,cute comments though trail will remain I am very sure

Someone died by electrocution on Duke property and we didn't hear about it?

nicoletta 08-22-2016 08:28 AM

yes they blew out the power to Wal-Mart at 2;33 am when it happened

Allegiance 08-22-2016 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nicoletta (Post 1276103)
yes they blew out the power to Wal-Mart at 2;33 am when it happened

I would love to see a link to that story. How did that stay under the radar?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.