Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
Closed Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
||
|
||
![]()
I asked this question of staff->
I heard a rumor from Bruce that the gate card system in the Villages is going to change. Be forewarned that I have been giving out and using the devices that are placed in car mirrors to activate the gates for over a year. So, please tell me the reason for the change and why my cards will no longer work. Is there a way that these cards can still work? I believe that the using the old cards and having to wave them out an open car window is archaic in this electronic age. So, if changes are made when will we receive a device that will automatically raise gates without human interaction? A very large number of Villagers may be upset when they find out these (auto open) cards no longer work and then need to go back to the old, old way. I am sorry that this change was not highlighted in a newsletter to let people know that this change was going to take place. I hope you have some good news for me about this issue as it looks very bad at this point in time. and -> One additional questions about data if collected. What data is collected , who has access to the data and data collected is used for what purpose. I thought long ago that I was told no data was collected nor retained by the gate card system and not talking about the security cameras at the gates. Thanks again, they responded by saying -> Thank you for reaching out regarding the gate access control system upgrade. This project was approved in September, with support from the Amenity Authority Committee, Project Wide Advisory Committee and the Village Center and Sumter Landing CDDs. The District has been seeking a new software vendor for a number of years to replace the existing system. As growth continued year after year in concert with the volume of card reads at the gates, the incoming data began to overburden and, at times, exceed the capacity of the existing software database. As a result, there are instances of unauthorized cards successfully opening gates; when the new system is in place, only properly credentialed cards will open the gates. The District identified Software House C-Cure as a viable alternative to replace the existing software. This software provides a robust and expandable access control system. The capacity of the database is capable of storing one (1) million gate cards and it is administered through one centralized database. An additional benefit to Software House C-Cure is that the software is compatible with nearly all existing peripheral equipment at the gate locations – motors, readers, arms, loops, network electronics etc. In addition, all gate cards issued by the District will continue to work. By implementing this solution, only the controller itself would be replaced. The access control system at the gates continues to serve a vital role in the community with regard to traffic management, calming and monitoring. The benefits of proper management of the access control system will further enhance the overall management of gate card data, prevent card duplication and provide more robust reporting capabilities. This is a significant benefit to residents, Staff and local law enforcement agencies. Gate card transactions are utilized to understand the volume on certain roadways, identification of individuals in the event property is damaged, and law enforcement routinely asks for reporting at specific locations. There are certain areas in the community, such as the RV lots, that have limited access and require specific credentials assigned to the gate card. Regardless of the type of access, the District does not condone the unauthorized duplication of cards. When cards are assigned, they are tied to a specific residence or contractor based on the credentials. As with any access control system, it is not expected that these would be duplicated since it would also unnecessarily burden the volume of cards in the system. The AAC and PWAC both expressed interest in exploring options to improve the method in which the gates are activated, including the type of devices and/or methods for opening a gate arm. The first step in the project is to upgrade the back-end software. Once that is accomplished, Staff will be communicating the Committees/Boards on other opportunities to enhance the functionality of the gates. I then replied -> I totally disagree with this assessment and wish that a public discussion had taken place. I understand that access control systems at the gates serve to slow traffic and let golf carts cross. However many of your other comments I would question. The few that need restricted access to RV lots could have been given special cards. What other areas and how many other Villagers are affected compared to the total Village population? You never answered my question as to how much detailed data the system is keeping on people accessing public roads. We are not a gate restricted community. If the volume of individual cards that a new system can handle is 1 million, then what’s the big deal about duplicates? Plus, the cards are cloned to one that is already in the system. I don’t under this concern about duplicates. What are the specific benefits to the public in this new change other than making many thousands of duplicate cards not function? CLONED CARDS WILL NOT WORK??? I again ask what data is collected and who has access to this data. Is this data used by public or private firms? Can I access the data? A private or public firm is the only one assigning gate cards at this time? Please note that I am not discussing the gate cameras. I believe cameras which are now located at the gates help identify individuals for law enforcement and not gate cards as you suggest. What is the total cost of the new system for both hardware and software going to be for residents? This change to the gate management system should have been presented and discussed at a large public meeting with details in the paper and on the district website beforehand. I am on the NSCUDD board and have always advocated for preannounced large public discussions of changes we make that affect the public. NSCUDD has held many advertised large public meetings to discuss changes and I am proud we have done so because that is the way it should be done. a link to details on the contracts found on districtgov.org Coversheet |
|
#2
|
||
|
||
![]()
I appreciate your post to attempt to explain a new gate card system. But, to me, it read as mostly gobblygook. Can you condense it down to something people can understand?
|
#3
|
||
|
||
![]()
I'm sure those that have these "gate card" illegally (landscapers, etc..) will also be upset.
![]() |
#4
|
||
|
||
![]()
The response seemed logical and reasonable to me.
As far as duplicates - What prevents a resident from giving a duplicate to friends in other communities? I can understand the districts stand on duplicates. |
#5
|
||
|
||
![]()
Seems to clearly state:
An additional benefit to Software House C-Cure is that the software is compatible with nearly all existing peripheral equipment at the gate locations – motors, readers, arms, loops, network electronics etc. In addition, all gate cards issued by the District will continue to work. By implementing this solution, only the controller itself would be replaced. Can't see how it will affect cloned cards since the ancient reader system will remain the same as all that is changing is the database software. At least for the immediate future it seems to be "much ado about nothing." I think most of us will be pushing up daisies before new READER HARDWARE is brought up for discussion, decided upon and installed throughout T.V. . Personally I'd be happy to see window stickers or devices "under the hood" as my father's 40+ year old system had in his 60 year old condo development. As for the information they are keeping, I'd be more concerned with the online tracks you leave when placing online orders or joining apps like many restaurants and businesses have as well as every credit card purchase you make. I believe my "mirror pass" will outlast me.
__________________
. . "I think the scariest person in the world is the person with no sense of humor." Michael J. Fox |
#6
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
My most pressing conserns are will the cloned gate cards still work and how much is the total cost. Still not sure as I just received this reply for staff-> __________________________________________________ _________________________________ Good afternoon, I appreciate your perspective, but this was publicly advertised on the website and on the agenda for consideration at a total of four (4) public meetings. The roadways are public and individuals always have the option to either enter through a staffed gate, or open the gate utilizing the red button. The gate cards are issued in a pair to every home at closing, and homeowners can also purchase additional gate cards for a $15.00 charge from the District office. A total of four gate cards can be issued per home. The gate cards are assigned to the home and when used report the location, time stamp and card number. As with any information maintained by a governmental entity, in the event a public records request is received we review the request and respond in accordance with the law. There are certain factors that prevent data from being released immediately, such as if the data has been obtained by law enforcement and tied to an active investigation. Here is a link to the Project Wide Advisory Committee Meeting agenda, which was the first meeting that this was presented at: Coversheet Please note that the new gate maintenance contract cost, combined with the software upgrade, results in a $200,000 savings compared to what we were previously paying for gate maintenance alone. In year two, following the upgrade, we will realize even greater savings. Duplication of any type of credentials for an access control system is not favorably looked upon. As I mentioned in the initial email, in order for the District to pursue advancements in how the gates are operated (such as bar codes, proximity readers etc.) , we have to upgrade the software to support it. These are upgrades that the AAC and PWAC have requested updates on once this initial phase is complete. __________________________________________________ ________ It's good to hear that we will be saving $200,000 per year in the future but at what cost to us now. I just like to see the whole picture. So, I will ask again about the total cost and if current cloned cards will still work. While "not favorably looked on ", it isn't illegal and I believe it is a much better way to open our gates than the old cards. They are very vague about other upgrades to the system that might be implemented at some future date. I can understand this yet.. Last edited by twoplanekid; 10-11-2022 at 04:45 PM. |
#7
|
||
|
||
![]()
I don't understand the angst over duplicate cards. What difference does it make? The red button allows anyone to access any village with no need for a card! I think a bureaucrat somewhere is bored or trying to justify their existence. Sometimes I believe I'm actually living in the movie "Idiocracy".
|
#8
|
||
|
||
![]()
I use the little red button when driving the cart because we have 2 gate cards for our cars. What information is important to the powers that manage our roads and whatever other aspects the data collected might serve? The gates help control the flow of traffic for users of the Multi Modal Paths and that is important. Does it matter if you use a card reader or just push the button to open the gate? Either method forces you to stop before going through it. Just make sure every vehicle passing through the gates is recorded in the event of criminal activity.
__________________
Terry ![]() Always be humble and kind. |
#9
|
||
|
||
![]()
A couple of key sentences:
"The first step in the project is to upgrade the back-end software. Once that is accomplished, Staff will be communicating the Committees/Boards on other opportunities to enhance the functionality of the gates. " "As I mentioned in the initial email, in order for the District to pursue advancements in how the gates are operated (such as bar codes, proximity readers etc.) , we have to upgrade the software to support it. These are upgrades that the AAC and PWAC have requested updates on once this initial phase is complete. |
#10
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
|
#11
|
||
|
||
![]()
the software cannot handle data for perhaps 100 thousand swipes? Even if the number is twice that, seems kinda far fetched with the technology available today.
Someone needs to contact Florida based Cyber Ninjas. Those folks are apparently geniuses in counting and handling very large volume of data. |
#12
|
||
|
||
![]()
Just push the red button.
|
#13
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
I couldn't guess as to how many clone cards are in circulation/use over the years, but each one would be taking away $$ or rubs against whom ever has the contract as the service provider. None of this is about making life better for residence, because if it was, the realization that the entire antiquated system needs an overhaul/update to, oh maybe updated to circa year 2000'sh tech perhaps. (sarcasm) There are countless fairly simple programs out there in use right now that utilize decal type scannable's, 1/3rd the size of a credit card and can be read from 100+ft away w/ vehicles in full motion and can handle millions of scannable's, take pictures/vid, record digi info, automatically open/close gates, etc. all without a single interaction of the driver. Besides the entire system is rather ineffective as actual "access control" when anyone can hit the red button. Knowledge of, that is fairly widely known outside the villages....NO card needed. |
#14
|
||
|
||
![]()
Bingo.
|
#15
|
||
|
||
![]()
In Tampa many gated communities had a sticker on the side window with a bar code to enter your neighborhood.
The good part was you didn’t have to open your window. Why couldn’t we have this instead of the card?
__________________
/// |
Closed Thread |
|
|
|