Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, General Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/)
-   -   Is Our Current Approach to Coronavirus the Quickest Way to Cure the Problem? (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/our-current-approach-coronavirus-quickest-way-cure-problem-304957/)

Velvet 04-07-2020 12:34 PM

How do we know OP is a US citizen? Or....

Two Bills 04-07-2020 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 1742020)
or about 20% more than a bad flu season. A lot of predictions are in the 120-200,000 range, but still not the end of the world

It is for those who beome a statistic on a graph!

golfing eagles 04-07-2020 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Two Bills (Post 1742098)
It is for those who beome a statistic on a graph!

And for the 56,991,000 who die every year. What is your point?

coffeebean 04-07-2020 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dcurrie947 (Post 1741817)
Why hasn't anyone suggested everyone wear something over their face? If the virus enters thru the nose or mouth doesn't it make sense if everyone was covered when they left the house this thing would be gone in a short period of time?

Our Government and the experts, Dr. Birx for one, have requested that everyone should wear face covering to protect those around us. Trump still refuses to do that but he just recently tested negative again. I personally think this request should be mandatory for anyone outside of their home in an enclosed space. I also think this request for face covering should have been made weeks ago, IMHO.

Dr Winston O Boogie jr 04-07-2020 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C. C. Rider (Post 1741699)
I know there are many threads on the coronavirus problem, but please allow me to start one to discuss just one specific aspect of this. I recently read in another thread here a comment to the effect that if we will just stick rigorously to our social distancing practices and practice good handwashing and the like, that we will be over this problem quicker.

While that may sound logical and correct, I don't believe that it is. In fact, if you will recall, the whole idea behind shutting things down and maintaining social distancing was to drag this process out for many months so as not to have too many cases at one time which would overwhelm our hospital resources. In other words, we wanted to "flatten" the curve, not have a short, sharp, high curve.

The quickest way to be rid of the CV problem would be to make no changes in our everyday habits, let people catch the virus, and then have about 99% of them recover and thereby build herd immunity rather quickly. The problem with this approach is that fatalities would likely be higher in the near term because the number of seriously ill patients would overwhelm our hospital system.

So, the powers that be chose the approach that would drag this situation out for a much longer period of time. While this approach would likely be easier to handle from a healthcare perspective, it will undoubtedly extend the time that we are dealing with the disease to a much, much longer period of time.

The drawback to this approach is that the disease doesn't really go away, it just spreads at a much slower rate and therefore takes a much longer period of time for our country to build a sizeable herd immunity. If we were able to go about our ordinary lives while slowing down the spread of the virus, that would be great, but unfortunately we can't.

So, I don't mean to be the bearer of bad news, but I'm concerned that this "social distancing" and shutting down of all non-essential businesses may be with us a LOT longer than many people think. In fact, the better we are at self distancing, the longer the situation will likely last.

So it appears that we either stay the course for many months or resume life as usual in a few weeks and see a rapid return of many sick people. The only bright light that I can see in the "slow" approach that was chosen is that it may buy us some time in the hopes that a cure may be found quickly. I certainly hope so.

There is one other alternative, but it's not popular in many circles... and that is to isolate the most vulnerable (the aged, the immune compromised, etc) and let the rest of the country go back to work. Personally, that's the approach that I think should have been taken from the start, but many people think otherwise.

I hope everyone stays well. I just wanted to present the choices as I see them.


Thanks

One of the things you're not considering is the number of cases that require hospitalization. While it's true that only about 1% of the people that get the virus die, about 12% require a hospital stay. So I guess if you're OK with with a possible extended hospital stay at a time when hospitals are overwhelmed then I guess it's OK for you to get the virus. I'd rather not.

jklfairwin 04-07-2020 01:14 PM

Herd immunity is basically the approach unintentionally taken in Italy and Spain. I don't want the US to have those results.
This is from Healthline:
There are several reasons why herd immunity isn’t the answer to stopping the spread of the new coronavirus:

There isn’t yet a vaccine for SARS-CoV-2. Vaccinations are the safest way to practice herd immunity in a population.
The research for antivirals and other medications to treat COVID-19 is ongoing.
Scientists don’t know if you can contract SARS-CoV-2 and develop COVID-19 more than once.
People who contract SARS-CoV-2 and develop COVID-19 can experience serious side effects. Severe cases can lead to death.
Doctors don’t yet know exactly why some people who contract SARS-CoV-2 develop severe COVID-19, while others do not.
Vulnerable members of society, such as older adults and people with some chronic health conditions, could get very sick if they’re exposed to this virus.
Otherwise healthy and younger people may become very ill with COVID-19.
Hospitals and healthcare systems may be overburdened if many people develop COVID-19 at the same time.

Johnsocat 04-07-2020 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoPacers (Post 1741724)
I think you've summarized it exactly as it is. This is not sustainable from a societal perspective and we've yet to hear a cogent alternative. My fear is our government doesn't have a plan and is making it up as we progress.

Regardless, your assessment is on point.

Ok. What's YOUR plan? Need not reply. Implement it in your area of responsibility.
Im really tired of people bashing the efforts of our government at all levels because they feel they could do so much better. I suggest that if you feel you are wiser, smarter and more capable you run for office! Otherwise, you should do what you can to support the efforts of our leaders.

allsport 04-07-2020 01:32 PM

I am assuming you are going to someone who steps up and dies from the virus. Nice, I will stay home and wait for treatments or the vaccine.

Mumbles 04-07-2020 02:09 PM

Hmmm!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by C. C. Rider (Post 1741699)
In fact, if you will recall, the whole idea behind shutting things down and maintaining social distancing was to drag this process out for many months so as not to have too many cases at one time which would overwhelm our hospital resources. In other words, we wanted to "flatten" the curve, not have a short, sharp, high curve.

The quickest way to be rid of the CV problem would be to make no changes in our everyday habits, let people catch the virus, and then have about 99% of them recover and thereby build herd immunity rather quickly. The problem with this approach is that fatalities would likely be higher in the near term because the number of seriously ill patients would overwhelm our hospital system.

So, the powers that be chose the approach that would drag this situation out for a much longer period of time. While this approach would likely be easier to handle from a healthcare perspective, it will undoubtedly extend the time that we are dealing with the disease to a much, much longer period of time.

The drawback to this approach is that the disease doesn't really go away, it just spreads at a much slower rate and therefore takes a much longer period of time for our country to build a sizeable herd immunity. If we were able to go about our ordinary lives while slowing down the spread of the virus, that would be great, but unfortunately we can't.

So, I don't mean to be the bearer of bad news, but I'm concerned that this "social distancing" and shutting down of all non-essential businesses may be with us a LOT longer than many people think. In fact, the better we are at self distancing, the longer the situation will likely last.

So it appears that we either stay the course for many months or resume life as usual in a few weeks and see a rapid return of many sick people. The only bright light that I can see in the "slow" approach that was chosen is that it may buy us some time in the hopes that a cure may be found quickly. I certainly hope so.

There is one other alternative, but it's not popular in many circles... and that is to isolate the most vulnerable (the aged, the immune compromised, etc) and let the rest of the country go back to work. Personally, that's the approach that I think should have been taken from the start, but many people think otherwise.

Thanks

1. Well. You have made many points to ponder. If you look at the pink highlighted phrases, you'll see where your entire arguments are going: SPEED. There IS no such thing as speed in the viral world, especially in developing it and suffering through it.

2. Next, our problems with time and shortening it so that we can go back to "normal", as many people think is what will happen, is that we were not ready to test huge numbers of people. Testing is the ONLY way science has of getting lots of information about the virus and therefore how to approach a cure. So, forget developing a cure quickly. The administration was absolutely and indisputably NOT READY for this sickness and, I think we know why.

3. Staying in your living area DOES provide less viruses from happening to you and your family (if you have one living with you). It's not the best answer. But it does prevent NEW infections, except in your own home if one or more of you are a hidden virus receptacle.

4. Letting everyone get the virus so that we all develop anti-bodies that may, in the end, help ward away a second wave, is SO unscientific, SO absurd when you think about the effects on all of us. It is Russian Roulette, and I believe you know why. Example, what if you, your spouse if you have one, your children, if they live with you become infected because you went about your business as "normal"? When you next LOSE one of these members, the trauma will FAR outweigh getting a tough personal reaction if you even get a "minor" form. The mortuary, the coffin or burial urn kept on your mantle may end up being worthy of despair because it happened in YOUR family. Even if you were spared, which is not very likely, what of all our friends, acquaintances, professionals we visit ET CETERA? There are SO many people in our country who are NOT in good health who are more likely to die from their present health-lacking selves: diabetes, cancer, kidney problems, colon polyps, ulcers, heart problems, obesity (which is over 1/2 the people in the USA), alcoholism, drug addiction, eating problems, anemia, sickle cell conditions, the homeless who have little to NO health care, the very poor who equally have little to NO health care, heavy smoking that already affects the lungs permanently, asthma, COPD, those who are on constant anti-bacterial meds. . . .

5. We don't know WHO is silently viral because there have not been a large enough number of the population who have been tested. None of us ever had this virus, ever. Therefore, NO antibodies which would likely protect us.

6. We don't have any cure whatsoever and won't until election time or later, IF THEN.

& So. considering all these things (and I only put in certain arguments), there is nothing wrong or incorrect about we humans going ALL OUT to save our own A***s. Who, dear God, would deliberately send their family members out knowing these possibilities exist, regardless how much time it took?

But, about the argument that we would go back to work, AS LONG AS we didn't show any signs of virus and we could save hospital resources, too. WooHoo! This is a straw man argument.

All of this has been in response to the arguments provided on ToTV by one poster and also, at times, given by other posters. All my arguments are mine, and are not taken from any one person, cable TV channel, or other sources.

coffeebean 04-07-2020 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ts12755 (Post 1741823)
Of course our govt doesnt have a plan...Niether does the rest of the world. No one alive today has ever seen a worldwide pandemic like this. The last one was in 1918.

Not true. I saw on TV a gentleman who just had his 104th birthday. He survived the 1918 influenza pandemic, WWII and a whole lot of other things. He was wearing a birthday hat too when they presented him with a birthday cake. Made my heart sing.

coffeebean 04-07-2020 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TNLAKEPANDA (Post 1741855)
News Flash

In South Korea people who have gotten the virus and recovered has later tested positive again!

Better that you never get it and hope foe a vaccine 💉

Are those who have tested positive for the second time, sick? Are they symptomatic requiring a ventilator? Or......have their antibodies fought off the virus?

Bogie Shooter 04-07-2020 02:39 PM

A lot of posters on this thread speak as if they read the book "1984" and thought it was a successful case study.

coffeebean 04-07-2020 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theruizs (Post 1741866)
Present this idea to the doctors and nurses dealing with this right now. If they are on board with it (the current nightmare times 2 or 3) then you have a better argument. Also, since this virus hits 65 and older and those with underlying conditions hardest (much higher death rate among them), I think they should have some input too. Finally, I find it hard to believe that letting the virus run rampant will be less disruptive and destructive to our economy. Have you seen the death rates in those countries where it gets out of control? Italy’s is over 12%, Spain’s is almost 10%. However, Germany’ is less than 2% (we should follow their lead since ours is approaching 3%). At any rate, I still value life over money any day. Given everything I have read and heard, I believe a better solution to getting this under control quickly is for it to become mandatory for everyone to wear face masks anytime they are not in their home, period.

It is not known for sure what the death rate is because not everyone is being tested. What about all those people who are asymptomatic? They are not factored in to the percentage of deaths. The death rate is lower if all those untested asymptomatic people are included in the calculations.

xNYer 04-07-2020 02:42 PM

The quickest way to be rid of the CV problem would be to make no changes in our everyday habits, let people catch the virus, and then have about 99% of them recover and thereby build herd immunity rather quickly.

Brilliant 1% of the U.S. population dies so we can get her immunity. 330,000,000 people.Lets have 3,300,000 die. Great option.

Topspinmo 04-07-2020 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C. C. Rider (Post 1741955)
That's 2 Million deaths per year just in the categories you listed. And the majority of those deaths listed would be considered as "immune compromised" categories which is precisely the ones that are most susceptible to dying from coronavirus.

So, I think it is reasonable to conclude that the TOTAL number of deaths in the US this year may not be much more than an ordinary year. It's just that the cause of death on the death certificate will say "Coronavirus" instead of "Heart Disease", "Cancer", "Diabetes", etc.

But, they might not of died this year or next year.

bpascani 04-07-2020 02:53 PM

I was reading the stats in Alachua County (Florida) today. So far, 133 diagnosed, 15 hospitalized, 0 deaths. the most interesting is, the most were in the 15-24 and 25-34 year old groups. The least number of cases.. birth-4yrs, and 85+ !!

Topspinmo 04-07-2020 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drdoug49 (Post 1741983)
Asia has made substantial increases in their standard of living, so your characterization is false. In regards to the overweight TV , the average Korean women weighs 125lbs, the average American women weighs 168lbs.


Maybe in the areas you visit. Try getting out of fancy beach hotel and down the back streets. If our diet was mainly rice, fish, and some kind of little meat _____ (fill in the blank) the average here would weight less also.

tmiller166 04-07-2020 03:06 PM

Over 1700 people die of heart disease EVERY DAY on average. 150 die of pneumonia DAILY on average. Somehow we don’t seem to bother with those numbers in the media.

tmiller166 04-07-2020 03:10 PM

As the infectious disease experts at WHO have said... We are at war with this virus. The virus will win… It will just wait you out.

Healthiest 04-07-2020 03:20 PM

At this point, I think we are on the right path. However, you should read about what Iceland has done. They have very few deaths and I think we could have done that had we been allowed to get the tests from other countries. Iceland is doing frequent testing, putting those sick in quarantine, and tracing where each person caught the virus from. It's been very effective.

My opinion is based on discussions with physicians and nurses working directly with these patients. I've had many friends who are pretty sure they've had the virus, some that were confirmed and have friends who have had family members and friends die from this. The majority of these deaths were people under the age of 50 and no health conditions at all. About 40% of the people hospitalized are under the age of 55.

Unfortunately, it isn't just the elderly and the "immune compromised" who are at risk. Much younger people without any health issues are getting this and dying. Perhaps the elderly and immune compromised were the first to get this, but others are getting it now too. If people don't die, some are left with lung, heart and neurological problems. One friend of mine has a grandchild who was under a year old. She didn't die, but is now left with permanent brain damage.

If our country would have acted much faster and locked things down sooner, that might have really helped. At this point, it will slow things down, but since it seems like we're hearing all over the place that people aren't stopping their gathering in groups, so we aren't truly 'locked down.' The problem with this is that not only will the virus be here longer, it will most likely mutate and keep coming back. Warmer weather doesn't seem to affect it as much, so this will probably turn out to be much more deadly than the flu. When viruses mutate, there is a chance that it could mutate into something even worse.

This virus is very contagious and with the potentially long incubation period and a lot of people with no symptoms who have it, it's easy to spread.

Healthiest 04-07-2020 03:22 PM

Heart disease and pneumonia have been around for a VERY long time. This virus is just beginning. These numbers might not seem much to you now, but they will continue to grow year after year I fear.


Quote:

Originally Posted by tmiller166 (Post 1742194)
Over 1700 people die of heart disease EVERY DAY on average. 150 die of pneumonia DAILY on average. Somehow we don’t seem to bother with those numbers in the media.


Darield 04-07-2020 03:28 PM

In regards to people under, 60 and especially those under 40, almost no information is being released concerning whether they were smokers, vapors or obese. There have been a few doctors interviewed that have mentioned these things and information through friends and family is indicating that nurses are seeing mitigating factors in people under 40 who are getting very sick (often, those things I just listed). When this crisis is over and more data is released, I think there will be many conversations on the importance of diet, exercise and taking good care of our bodies.

golfing eagles 04-07-2020 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darield (Post 1742204)
In regards to people under, 60 and especially those under 40, almost no information is being released concerning whether they were smokers, vapors or obese. There have been a few doctors interviewed that have mentioned these things and information through friends and family is indicating that nurses are seeing mitigating factors in people under 40 who are getting very sick (often, those things I just listed). When this crisis is over and more data is released, I think there will be many conversations on the importance of diet, exercise and taking good care of our bodies.

I think you may mean exacerbating factors

coffeebean 04-07-2020 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mary Windsor (Post 1741971)
.........May God keep each and everyone safe!

But....that's not happening!!!

C. C. Rider 04-07-2020 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bpascani (Post 1742188)
I was reading the stats in Alachua County (Florida) today. So far, 133 diagnosed, 15 hospitalized, 0 deaths. the most interesting is, the most were in the 15-24 and 25-34 year old groups. The least number of cases.. birth-4yrs, and 85+ !!

Do you suppose that the 50,000+ students enrolled at University of Florida in Gainesville (Alachua County) might have some impact on those stats?

How many 0-4 year olds do you think have been tested for CV in Alachua County?

How many people over the age of 85 do you think are in Alachua County? The few that are there probably aren't bar-hopping or partying on the beach, so they likely aren't too exposed to CV unless a caretaker carries it in to them.

C. C. Rider 04-07-2020 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmiller166 (Post 1742194)
Over 1700 people die of heart disease EVERY DAY on average. 150 die of pneumonia DAILY on average. Somehow we don’t seem to bother with those numbers in the media.

Good point, but those numbers aren't scary enough to concern most people, but a few hundred dying from CV is.

C. C. Rider 04-07-2020 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Healthiest (Post 1742202)
Heart disease and pneumonia have been around for a VERY long time. This virus is just beginning. These numbers might not seem much to you now, but they will continue to grow year after year I fear.

So then we will have wrecked our economy, destroyed the future of our children and grandchildren, and still have to deal with deaths from coronavirus??? Then what's the point of destroying our economy? What will it have accomplished other than adding more TRILLIONS to our national debt? I don't want to have to bow to President Xi in a few years.

Bogie Shooter 04-07-2020 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C. C. Rider (Post 1742237)
So then we will have wrecked our economy, destroyed the future of our children and grandchildren, and still have to deal with deaths from coronavirus??? Then what's the point of destroying our economy? What will it have accomplished other than adding more TRILLIONS to our national debt? I don't want to have to bow to President Xi in a few years.

So, then back to work on Monday....right?

Jerry101 04-07-2020 06:04 PM

Herd Immunity
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by C. C. Rider (Post 1741699)
I know there are many threads on the coronavirus problem, but please allow me to start one to discuss just one specific aspect of this. I recently read in another thread here a comment to the effect that if we will just stick rigorously to our social distancing practices and practice good handwashing and the like, that we will be over this problem quicker.

While that may sound logical and correct, I don't believe that it is. In fact, if you will recall, the whole idea behind shutting things down and maintaining social distancing was to drag this process out for many months so as not to have too many cases at one time which would overwhelm our hospital resources. In other words, we wanted to "flatten" the curve, not have a short, sharp, high curve.

The quickest way to be rid of the CV problem would be to make no changes in our everyday habits, let people catch the virus, and then have about 99% of them recover and thereby build herd immunity rather quickly. The problem with this approach is that fatalities would likely be higher in the near term because the number of seriously ill patients would overwhelm our hospital system.

So, the powers that be chose the approach that would drag this situation out for a much longer period of time. While this approach would likely be easier to handle from a healthcare perspective, it will undoubtedly extend the time that we are dealing with the disease to a much, much longer period of time.

The drawback to this approach is that the disease doesn't really go away, it just spreads at a much slower rate and therefore takes a much longer period of time for our country to build a sizeable herd immunity. If we were able to go about our ordinary lives while slowing down the spread of the virus, that would be great, but unfortunately we can't.

So, I don't mean to be the bearer of bad news, but I'm concerned that this "social distancing" and shutting down of all non-essential businesses may be with us a LOT longer than many people think. In fact, the better we are at self distancing, the longer the situation will likely last.

So it appears that we either stay the course for many months or resume life as usual in a few weeks and see a rapid return of many sick people. The only bright light that I can see in the "slow" approach that was chosen is that it may buy us some time in the hopes that a cure may be found quickly. I certainly hope so.

There is one other alternative, but it's not popular in many circles... and that is to isolate the most vulnerable (the aged, the immune compromised, etc) and let the rest of the country go back to work. Personally, that's the approach that I think should have been taken from the start, but many people think otherwise.

I hope everyone stays well. I just wanted to present the choices as I see them.

Thanks

I looked up ‘herd immunity’ in my new Thesaurus. It said ‘Russian Roulette’.

Velvet 04-07-2020 06:15 PM

Lol

queasy27 04-07-2020 07:09 PM

Quote:

Also, the virus could prove to be both seasonal and able to mutate and come back in another form that immunity may not block.
This is the most critical point to me against herd immunity arguments.

jimjamuser 04-07-2020 07:31 PM

I agree with you. And let the medical expert decide.

TomPerrett 04-07-2020 08:14 PM

Lovely thinking

MACH7SS 04-07-2020 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by queasy27 (Post 1742283)
This is the most critical point to me against herd immunity arguments.

Like it or not, herd immunity is happening as we speak. On the attached Florida Dashboard web site shown as EXPERIENCE, you will see several black tabs along the bottom that say Florida Cases, Florida Testing, Cases by County, Case by zip code, etc. Click on Cases by County and then click on a specific county. Once the county loads, hoover your mouse over each age demographic bracket. You will see how many confirmed cases are in that county by age range. Now consider the fact that according to the experts, approximately 80% of people are asymptomatic meaning little to no symptoms are present. Using that information, you can imagine how many Floridians are exposed/infected and don't know they are infected. That my friend is herd immunity in the works. And one last comment to address your point. Even if the Coronavirus mutates, it's basic RNA makeup will remain fairly constant. Therefore, some immunity will be better than no immunity. Obviously a vaccine would be wonderful but with human testing, a vaccine will take to long for a useful solution this year and perhaps next year. At some point, herd immunity will be our only hope. The world cannot quarantine, social distance forever. The only outstanding question is: how long should we social distance to prevent overwhelming our healthcare system?

Experience

Peggyfitz 04-07-2020 09:38 PM

Great Quote
 
Great decision!! It’s best not to get sick at all. Nurses & Doctors have never delt with this before. They get training on how to handle chemo patients, neuro, renal failure, diabetes. But there was no training for Covid Virus.
They can hook these patients to a respirator and hope for the best. While the rest of their body shuts down, they do their best to keep the patients alive.
Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 1741735)
Just make sure to write your obit before locking yourself in a school gym with all your pals who are willing to sacrifice themselves for the sake of humanity.

I for one would prefer not to get sick in the first place, than to get sick and risk death while hoping to recover and become immune.


golfing eagles 04-08-2020 05:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peggyfitz (Post 1742340)
Great decision!! It’s best not to get sick at all. Nurses & Doctors have never delt with this before. They get training on how to handle chemo patients, neuro, renal failure, diabetes. But there was no training for Covid Virus.
They can hook these patients to a respirator and hope for the best. While the rest of their body shuts down, they do their best to keep the patients alive.

Really??? I guess all the courses in virology and epidemiology that I sat through were hallucinations. I guess all the patients with serious viral infections that I managed was a dream----Eastern Equine Encephalitis, Varicella pneumonitis, Herpetic encephalitis, and even 1 case of Lassa fever.
No one had SPECIFIC experience with COVID-19, but I'm sure all the "untrained" doctors and nurses can muddle through this epidemic. BTW, they are doing a heck of a lot more than "hoping for the best"

MACH7SS 04-08-2020 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 1742377)
Really??? I guess all the courses in virology and epidemiology that I sat through were hallucinations. I guess all the patients with serious viral infections that I managed was a dream----Eastern Equine Encephalitis, Varicella pneumonitis, Herpetic encephalitis, and even 1 case of Lassa fever.
No one had SPECIFIC experience with COVID-19, but I'm sure all the "untrained" doctors and nurses can muddle through this epidemic. BTW, they are doing a heck of a lot more than "hoping for the best"

I am so glad you responded to this post. I was going to give my opinion but I couldn't until I cleaned up the Rice Chex breakfast that I spit across the table landing on my wife's CME requirements! Seriously people.......doctors and nurses aren't trained to deal with pandemics???
What about SARS, MERS, H1N1, and many other viruses?

graciegirl 04-08-2020 08:39 AM

Thank you Dr. Golfing Eagles.
 
I THINK the OP was suggesting to just bite the bullet, let the chips fall where they may and save the economy.

I don't think it is that simple.

I think we are going to face the largest economic depression the world has ever seen no matter what we do.

I think the president was thinking along these lines when he suggested earlier that we should "go back to work" in April. I don't know what changed his mind.

Some people think, why just not let people die, the most endangered are close to dying of natural causes anyway.

It could be some kind of awful "natural selection" or it could be an awful experiment gone terribly wrong and it could be someone planned on purpose to destroy just America? I don't think so personally, but there is plenty of fuel for those fires if you read this forum or listen to many opinions.

I think the human race has something that is stronger than allowing people to die from disease if they can do anything to not let that happen.

What do you think?

bumpygreens 04-08-2020 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerry101 (Post 1742259)
I looked up ‘herd immunity’ in my new Thesaurus. It said ‘Russian Roulette’.

Only if the revolver had 80 chambers.

Barbara Jacks 04-08-2020 09:50 AM

I don't want to contribute my life for the herd, or the lives of my family. I think I'll stay in.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.