Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, General Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/)
-   -   Question Bicyclists and Stop Signs (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/question-bicyclists-stop-signs-337294/)

golfing eagles 12-16-2022 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianherlihy (Post 2167149)
bickes stay in the road

///

OrangeBlossomBaby 12-16-2022 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAVES (Post 2166787)
There is no shortage of stupid inconsiderate people. Who is right who is wrong,
people will post as always, OPINIONS based on their bias. Taking a bicycle into a round a bout is a bit NUTS. Taking a group of bicycle riders into a round about is perhaps MIXED NUTS.

As far as bikes and stop signs. All should realize that a bicycle is human powered. If does not start from a stop as a car or a golf cart does. Most drivers, of cars or golf carts, if, honest, admit they do at best a rolling stop at a stop sign. When, on my bike I do the same.

Far as LAW, how many drivers know they are supposed to be three feet away from the side of a bicycle. Clearly not all drivers are good drivers. Just the other day I had a lady not more than three inches from my bike. Was she unaware or did she not care. Truth SHE WAS WRONG.

There is no other way to get to the country club. The country club is in the center of the roundabout. If you want to play golf there, or use the pool there, or get a meal or a drink there, then you /must/ enter the roundabout.

In addition - if you live near the country club and want to visit someone across the way - you can either ride up the couple of blocks to get to that other street - or you can ride a couple of MILES around the back way to get to the same spot.

Laker14 12-17-2022 06:16 AM

I had a moment yesterday that was partly my fault and partly a vehicle's fault. We avoided a collision by each being a bit cautious as each of us broke traffic laws.

I was coming off the MMP at a gate (I was coming from the southbound Buena Vista MMP, turning right onto Bailey Trail, heading westbound). Now, as a cart I have a "stop" sign (is it a real stop sign? I mean, the MMP is not really a thoroughfare under the purview and jurisdiction of Florida State Law as I understand it, but local convention is for carts here to give ROW to cars), there was a vehicle approaching a lowered gate arm.

I slowed way down, but did not stop, but I knew the vehicle had to stop to wait for the gate to open. So I rolled slowly through my stop sign, and made the right turn into the cart lane on Bailey.

Now I ask you to consider, while I did not come to a complete stop, is this not how most of us would handle this?

Now here is where it gets interesting. The vehicle did not wait for the gate arm to come up, nor did the vehicle stop or slow down at the gate. The vehicle continued at normal speed AROUND the gate and headed for the right cart lane on Bailey, same lane as I was headed for.

The other vehicle was a crisply moving bike. I treated it like an automobile thinking it would either wait for the gate arm, or at least slow down for me. The rider treated the situation as if the gate arm did not exist, nor the stop sign pointing at him.

We looked at each other. I slowed a bit, and let him go around me, he got in front of me on the cart/bike lane, and immediately I passed him. I couldn't tell if he was glaring at me, or just looking at me carefully. I was startled at the fact that he never even slowed down at the gate.

I am not making this story up as a theoretical situation. This actually happened on my way home from Tierra del Sol yesterday afternoon. The more I think about it, the more I wonder who would have been at fault had he T-boned my cart.

golfing eagles 12-17-2022 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laker14 (Post 2167221)
I had a moment yesterday that was partly my fault and partly a vehicle's fault. We avoided a collision by each being a bit cautious as each of us broke traffic laws.

I was coming off the MMP at a gate (I was coming from the southbound Buena Vista MMP, turning right onto Bailey Trail, heading westbound). Now, as a cart I have a "stop" sign (is it a real stop sign? I mean, the MMP is not really a thoroughfare under the purview and jurisdiction of Florida State Law as I understand it, but local convention is for carts here to give ROW to cars), there was a vehicle approaching a lowered gate arm.

I slowed way down, but did not stop, but I knew the vehicle had to stop to wait for the gate to open. So I rolled slowly through my stop sign, and made the right turn into the cart lane on Bailey.

Now I ask you to consider, while I did not come to a complete stop, is this not how most of us would handle this?

Now here is where it gets interesting. The vehicle did not wait for the gate arm to come up, nor did the vehicle stop or slow down at the gate. The vehicle continued at normal speed AROUND the gate and headed for the right cart lane on Bailey, same lane as I was headed for.

The other vehicle was a crisply moving bike. I treated it like an automobile thinking it would either wait for the gate arm, or at least slow down for me. The rider treated the situation as if the gate arm did not exist, nor the stop sign pointing at him.

We looked at each other. I slowed a bit, and let him go around me, he got in front of me on the cart/bike lane, and immediately I passed him. I couldn't tell if he was glaring at me, or just looking at me carefully. I was startled at the fact that he never even slowed down at the gate.

I am not making this story up as a theoretical situation. This actually happened on my way home from Tierra del Sol yesterday afternoon. The more I think about it, the more I wonder who would have been at fault had he T-boned my cart.

First of all, the important thing is that no one got hurt.

Secondly, it is probably wise to assume that 100% of cyclists will blow through any stop and yield signs since they don't think traffic laws apply to them because they are inconvenient.

Thirdly, my amateur opinion as to fault under the law----contributory negligence.

Laker14 12-17-2022 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2167231)
First of all, the important thing is that no one got hurt.

Secondly, it is probably wise to assume that 100% of cyclists will blow through any stop and yield signs since they don't think traffic laws apply to them because they are inconvenient.

Thirdly, my amateur opinion as to fault under the law----contributory negligence.

I agree with your assessment. on all three points. I was not surprised he went around the gate, and certainly not surprised he didn't stop. I was surprised by the speed at which he did it.

IMO our contributory negligence lead to the possibility of a collision, and our "contributory caution" avoided it, and in reality, we weren't really close to colliding. But if either one of us had been a tad less careful about the other, it could have been ugly.

Davonu 12-17-2022 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2167231)
…it is probably wise to assume that 100% of cyclists will blow through any stop and yield signs since they don't think traffic laws apply to them because they are inconvenient...

Oooohhh. Lost all credibility with that statement…especially the “100%” part.

golfing eagles 12-17-2022 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davonu (Post 2167247)
oooohhh. Lost all credibility with that statement…especially the “100%” part.

ok, -----99.8%

VApeople 12-18-2022 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laker14 (Post 2167221)
The more I think about it, the more I wonder who would have been at fault had he T-boned my cart.

You would have been at fault because you drove thru a clearly marked stop sign.

The biker did not have a stop sign so he did not have to stop. He had the right-of-way.

Bill14564 12-18-2022 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VApeople (Post 2167559)
You would have been at fault because you drove thru a clearly marked stop sign.

The biker did not have a stop sign so he did not have to stop. He had the right-of-way.

??? As described, the bicyclist *did* have a stop sign, in the form of a gate blocking the road, that he ignored by riding around it.

There wouldn't be any question of fault if a car had simply broken through the gate without slowing down so why is it any different with a bicycle?

Davonu 12-18-2022 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2167564)
??? As described, the bicyclist *did* have a stop sign, in the form of a gate blocking the road, that he ignored by riding around it.

There wouldn't be any question of fault if a car had simply broken through the gate without slowing down so why is it any different with a bicycle?

I’m not defending the bicyclist, but a gate DOES NOT equal a stop sign.

Bill14564 12-18-2022 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davonu (Post 2167601)
I’m not defending the bicyclist, but a gate DOES NOT equal a stop sign.

Right. A stop sign is an indicator for what the vehicle operator is supposed to do. A gate, on the other hand, is a physical barrier enforcing a behavior. One can simply ignore a sign but it takes a conscious action to either bust through or drive around a gate.

"I didn't see the sign" is hard to believe but "I didn't notice the gate" is impossible.

VApeople 12-18-2022 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2167564)
??? As described, the bicyclist *did* have a stop sign

Did the cycler have a sign with a STOP on it?

If not, then the cycler did not have a stop sign. QED, as we used to say in class.

Bill14564 12-18-2022 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VApeople (Post 2167611)
Did the cycler have a sign with a STOP on it?

If not, then the cycler did not have a stop sign. QED, as we used to say in class.

Are you asking if the cyclist faced a red, octangular sign with the letters STOP in white or are you asking if there was a clear indication that traffic, including cyclists, should stop?

I don't know about the former (I'm not standing there to look) but I am quite sure a out the latter.

OrangeBlossomBaby 12-18-2022 01:12 PM

So - the gates at Boone in the historic section have stop signs going in, and out. That's in addition to the gates themselves. Any bicyclist driving around those gates would be violating the law by doing so, if the gates were down at the time they drove around them.

Even when the gate is up (because the attendant has to use the bathroom, or there's bad weather and they remove the gates entirely) - those stop signs exist to instruct people to stop.

I don't know about the gate at Bailey but I'd be surprised if there wasn't similar signage.

If there is no similar signage, then there's no reason for the bicyclist to stop - from a legal standpoint. A barrier preventing cars from getting through - is not going to prevent a bicycle or pedestrian or roller skater or skateboarder or Segway user from getting through. The barrier exists to stop cars, afterall.

In addition, some of the sensors won't trigger if you're just on a bicycle or walking past. The gate at the public road won't come up if you're leaving the area, and there is no red button to /leave/ the neighborhood. Only to enter it.

rustyp 12-18-2022 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2167621)
So - the gates at Boone in the historic section have stop signs going in, and out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2167621)
That's in addition to the gates themselves. Any bicyclist driving around those gates would be violating the law by doing so, if the gates were down at the time they drove around them.

Even when the gate is up (because the attendant has to use the bathroom, or there's bad weather and they remove the gates entirely) - those stop signs exist to instruct people to stop.

I don't know about the gate at Bailey but I'd be surprised if there wasn't similar signage.

If there is no similar signage, then there's no reason for the bicyclist to stop - from a legal standpoint. A barrier preventing cars from getting through - is not going to prevent a bicycle or pedestrian or roller skater or skateboarder or Segway user from getting through. The barrier exists to stop cars, afterall.

In addition, some of the sensors won't trigger if you're just on a bicycle or walking past. The gate at the public road won't come up if you're leaving the area, and there is no red button to /leave/ the neighborhood. Only to enter it.

The "IN" gate at Boone does not have a stop sign making that intersection very dangerous. It renders that intersection a three way stop. The gate house sits back from Paradise drive allowing vehicles to get up a little head of speed before entering. The three stopped vehicles assume the entering vehicle is going to stop and BINGO crash. I have witnessed many accidents there over the years. I asked one time about putting a stop sign there and the rationale for not to was it would back up incoming traffic out onto Rt 441.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.