Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
#31
|
||
|
||
Airlines charge a fuel surcharge, cruise lines charge a fuel charge and their up front about, so what's the big deal about a restaurant being up front about a AFC charge? I'll still go there, and because their honest about it and don't try to hide it.
__________________
Jim USAF Retired U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service Senior Firearms Instructor, Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) Glynco, GA |
|
#32
|
||
|
||
It is without question a political statement .... my level of future patronage will be a similar one.
|
#33
|
||
|
||
Quote:
__________________
Barefoot At Last No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted. Saving one dog will not change the world, but surely for that one dog, the world will change forever. |
#34
|
||
|
||
Surcharges are sometimes applied by certain businesses to reflect temporary price increases due to temporary economic conditions rather than reprice their products or services temporarily. We are all familiar with fuel surcharges.
Normal business costs are just typically embedded in the price of the service or product. In the case of a restaurant, the cost of the meal. It is political grandstanding by some restaurants. They may be hoping to spur anger from customers for their political goals (sign of protest). Bottom line, it is spurring anger from customers alright.... But the anger is targeted at the restaurants more than anything else. Some of the restaurants that did it, ended up back peddled quickly as they began losing business from irate customers because of the surcharge. Why are those customers angry? Various reasons. Some recognize it for what it is. There are probably as many angry on each side of the political boundary. Some because they do not like the law, others because they know the restaurant is attempting to manipulate them. Still, quite a number surmise... If you are going to charge me more, I will go somewhere where there is no surcharge. Most large businesses are saavy enough to avoid that sort controversy out of fear of losing business permanently. They would consider it to be a public relations nightmare. Bottom line; Nothing to gain, but will probably lose some customers permanently that feel strongly about it! |
#35
|
||
|
||
Quote:
In regards to the person wanting a colonoscopy who did not have health insurance - not working and told she did not qualify for ACA? Why not? She made too much for Medicaid and not working? If she was so anxious for the colonoscopy and "made too much for Medicaid", why not pay for it out of pocket? I believe the going price is about $1500. Definitely worth it if so worried. |
#36
|
||
|
||
Another reason to raise prices is coming soon.
With the cost of food at the grocery, I am looking for some higher prices at the local restaurants here. Just makes common sense. We are really lucky to have such low prices for menu items. But it can't last forever.
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry. |
#37
|
||
|
||
I'm out too. I think that they should have done a gradual price increase but not have customers blatantly subsidize their workforce.
__________________
LI SNOWBIRD LI, Tall Trees "Every heart sings a song, incomplete, until another heart whispers back. Those who wish to sing always find a song. At the touch of a lover, everyone becomes a poet." Plato |
#38
|
||
|
||
Quote:
What bothers me is the reference to somewhat blaming the Villages ! Reading the statement... " We are slowly going from the Friendliest place in the world to the most nickel and dimed place in the world. " What does this surcharge have to do with the Villages ? Maybe I'm reading this wrong.
__________________
Troy, Rochester, Hazel Park, Harbor Beach, Grand Rapids, Michigan Last edited by Bonny; 02-13-2014 at 12:02 PM. |
#39
|
||
|
||
None of this even matters at this point! Employers won't have to participate in purchasing healthcare for employees now until 2016 - it was just announced this past week.
|
#40
|
||
|
||
Quote:
It will be interesting to see if Gator's still imposes the surcharge, even though they don't have to participate for almost two years. Isn't it only employers with over 50 employees that have to participate? It would be interesting to find out how many people Gator's employs. |
#41
|
||
|
||
Quote:
Looks like 21 locations. |
#42
|
||
|
||
I was at Gator's Dockside last night after the Katie Belle's Show.
Two beers and mozzarella sticks came to $6.96. Sales Tax $.52 + ACA Surcharge $.07 for a total of $7.55. Seven cents will not keep me out of Gators! |
#43
|
||
|
||
We went to CA and saw a surcharge but it must have been more than 1% because it was $2-3. When I asked about it, was told it was for Health Care costs for the wait staff. So we just included that as part of the tip and gave that much less in the tip. Since we were ordering for 4 and usually give 20%...I'm sure it wasn't much noticed. But again, for me it was the whole idea. Nobody gives me a surcharge for my rising healthcare costs. Why do I have to pay for others? I'm sure this 1% will rise...this is only the beginning.
|
#44
|
||
|
||
In the end, no matter how it is done, costs will be shifted to consumers.
Restaurants can probably approach it many ways. But if they disadvantage their employees with their method, they will lose the good employees that can get a better deal with another restaurant, and retain employees that have more trouble getting another job. |
Closed Thread |
|
|