[Chatbrat]

We've had multiple fatalities and injuries @ the intersection of Rt 44 & Powell Rd.

Its about time there is a 45 mph speed limit between Morse Blvd & US 301

With the current 55 mph, you can go 60 & not be cited for speeding.

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by Chatbrat

We've had multiple fatalities and injuries @ the intersection of Rt 44 & Powell Rd.

Its about time there is a 45 mph speed limit between Morse Blvd & US 301

With the current 55 mph, you can go 60 & not be cited for speeding.

So, your point is????? The are hundreds of thousands of miles of roads posted 55 and above. And isn't there a traffic light at that intersection? So for there to be an accident, somebody had to do something stupid, like run the light or turn on red in front of an oncoming car I don't buy that 55 vs. 45 increases accidents, otherwise just make the national speed limit 5 mph. On top of that, there really isn't much traffic coming by on 44. Drivers cause accidents, I see nothing at that intersection such as poor visibility that makes it dangerous. The side road intersections on 301 in the 65 mph. zones are far more dangerous.

[photo1902]

Originally Posted by Chatbrat

We've had multiple fatalities and injuries @ the intersection of Rt 44 & Powell Rd.

Its about time there is a 45 mph speed limit between Morse Blvd & US 301

With the current 55 mph, you can go 60 & not be cited for speeding.

My guess is that in the not to distant future, the speed limit will be reduced on that section of road, given the development taking place now.

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by photo1902

My guess is that in the not to distant future, the speed limit will be reduced on that section of road, given the development taking place now.

And that would be fine, just like 466 and 27. But right now, this is a 4 lane divided highway with minimal intersections, minimal commercial development and not much traffic. I think any accidents are on the driver, not the road or speed limit.

[tomwed]

I have friends who can see the 44A and BV intersection. They said there are a lot of accidents there as well.

Too bad there isn't a local police officer who follows these threads. I'll bet they would know what is dangerous and why it's dangerous all around us.

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by tomwed

I have friends who can see the 44A and BV intersections. They said there are a lot of accidents there as well.

Too bad there isn't a local police officer who follows these threads. I'll bet they would know what is dangerous and why it's dangerous all around us.

I'd like to know that as well. I live a mile from those intersections, drive thru them frequently and cannot see any problem, at least none that would be caused by anything other than utter stupidity.

[RickeyD]

Originally Posted by golfing eagles

I'd like to know that as well. I live a mile from those intersections, drive thru them frequently and cannot see any problem, at least none that would be caused by anything other than utter stupidity.

Correct, there is no such thing as an accident. That word implies innocence.

[mixsonci]

I agree with Golfing eagles assessment. Don't believe the speed limit on that part of the road is the problem.

[theorem painter]

I am not saying this was the cause of this accident but we have all seen that frequently a right turn on a red light does not involve a stop or even a brake. People go through those red lights like there is a right arrow. A major accident waiting to happen.

[Polar Bear]

Originally Posted by RickeyD

...there is no such thing as an accident. That word implies innocence.

Not even the occasional mechanical failure, blown tire, etc.?

[RickeyD]

Originally Posted by theorem painter

I am not saying this was the cause of this accident but we have all seen that frequently a right turn on a red light does not involve a stop or even a brake. People go through those red lights like there is a right arrow. A major accident waiting to happen.

Again, not an accident. Crash is appropriate. [emoji6]

[RickeyD]

Originally Posted by Polar Bear

Not even the occasional mechanical failure, blown tire, etc.?

No, the operator/owner is responsible for maintenance. I'm not saying 100% of the time, more like 99.8 %.

[Polar Bear]

Originally Posted by RickeyD

No, the operator/owner is responsible for maintenance.

Perfect maintenance does not eliminate the possibility of a situation beyond one's control.

[RickeyD]

Originally Posted by Polar Bear

Perfect maintenance does not eliminate the possibility of a situation beyond one's control.

That's another one ! Out of control...tired of hearing that.

[RickeyD]

I've noticed here in FL nobody leaves a crash without getting a ticket. That's the way it should be. NY doesn't do that.