[Bogie Shooter]

Originally Posted by maistocars

Taking an immune-compromised 4-month old to a restaurant during the start of flu season? If they knew the policy that was posted on the front door why would they go there? Sounds like they were looking for a legal battle before there was one. Putting a useless mask on any child can cause serious medical and psychological damage.

You should read some of the links to the reporting on this,,,,,,,,will make your posts sound more intelligent

[Bogie Shooter]

Originally Posted by Velvet

That’s good to know. The child was safe.

Easy to know,,,,,just read the posts with links.

[Bogie Shooter]

Originally Posted by DDToto41

Do you mean to say that they should stay in their house forever without going out for anything, just living off the government because they can't go to work. Be serious they have every right to go out. If they want to wear a mask it is their privilege. It looks to me as if the restaurant didn't want to serve them either because of the mask (political discrimination) or their ethnic background (ethnic discrimination).

Where did you dream up the ethnic background from???

[Bogie Shooter]

Originally Posted by Waltdisney4life

Fake news

What were you trying to say? Your basis for this ignorant post?

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter

What were you trying to say? Your basis for this ignorant post?

Go get 'em----you're on a roll

[Bogie Shooter]

Originally Posted by golfing eagles

Go get 'em----you're on a roll

Like the guy in the commercial, "it's a never ending challenge".

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter

Like the guy in the commercial, "it's a never ending challenge".

Yeah, tell me about it. You would think after correcting some people 4 or 5 times they would get it, but alas, they have their pig-headed notions firmly entrenched and are fully equipped with blinders and earplugs to the facts.

[OrangeBlossomBaby]

Originally Posted by Bandb875

I think this is BS, or a staged event. Anti maskers don't care if anyone wants to wear a mask. They just don't want to be required.

That is not true. There are people who are against mandatory masking...

and there are people who are against masking, period. THOSE are the "anti-mask" crowd.

They exist, obviously - since this restaurant owner is one of them.

Last year the sheriff of Ocala ordered that no one was ALLOWED to wear a mask in his offices, not employees or visitors. Mask-wearing was prohibited. You didn't have a choice. If you wanted to wear a mask, you could wear it outside, but not inside.

That was another anti-masker that made the national news.

There've been many. I actually had one accost me at Publix when I worked there, yelling at me to take my mask off and that I was going to make everyone else sick because my germs were just building up on the mask and would spread to everyone whenever I breathed. The manager had to step in.

There are nuts everywhere.

[Topspinmo]

Originally Posted by GrumpyOldMan

I dunno, maybe they should submit their news list to someone (you?) for approval on the merit of "worthwhileness".

Maybe they should hold another debate and not give the questions out before hand. O wait they apologize for that. All is well.

[GrumpyOldMan]

Originally Posted by Topspinmo

Maybe they should hold another debate and not give the questions out before hand. O wait they apologize for that. All is well.

Uh, what has that to do with anything today? And especially about this post?

[Dzurinko]

Originally Posted by jbartle1

They were trying to protect four month old immunocompromised child! Are you kidding me????? What the heck is going on in Texas????

That the great thing about America.... freedom of choice. Applies to both the restaurant owner as well as the patrons. BTW, why would anyone take a compromised child to a public restaurant?

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by Dzurinko

That the great thing about America.... freedom of choice. Applies to both the restaurant owner as well as the patrons. BTW, why would anyone take a compromised child to a public restaurant?

See post #82, and about half a dozen others that state the child was at home with grandparents. Reading a thread-------it's not just for breakfast any more

[jbartle1]

Originally Posted by Dzurinko

That the great thing about America.... freedom of choice. Applies to both the restaurant owner as well as the patrons. BTW, why would anyone take a compromised child to a public restaurant?

They didn't, but they didn't want to bring virus home to child.

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by jbartle1

They didn't, but they didn't want to bring virus home to child.

But their misconception was that a mask would prevent that, which it wouldn't. And I still think they picked the wrong restaurant, perhaps to make some sort of statement.

[Carla B]

BTW, they didn't take the child to the restaurant. Where did you get that idea?