Tresspassed Tresspassed - Page 6 - Talk of The Villages Florida

Tresspassed

Reply
Thread Tools
  #76  
Old Yesterday, 04:56 PM
billlaur billlaur is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 422
Thanks: 3
Thanked 189 Times in 71 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99 View Post
You can keep saying the same thing over and over, it will still be wrong.

When you bought in The Villages, you bought a home with Deed Restrictions. The District was not a party to that transaction.

There is nothing inherently illegal about Deed Restrictions, provided they don't discriminate agains a protected class. Private transactions are not protected by the 1st Amendment, nor are "signs" protected by the 1st Amendment. If signs were protected by the 1st Amendment, cities and towns wouldn't be able to adopt sign regulations. The 1st Amendment is the Right of Free Speech ... it is not "The Right to Post and/or Carry Signs".
You should read the 1st amendment there are 5 elements to it….
  #77  
Old Yesterday, 04:59 PM
billlaur billlaur is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 422
Thanks: 3
Thanked 189 Times in 71 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
Of course, if I want to find something about the Villages I should search on "three counties" or "57 square miles." But that's okay... you apparently haven't notice yet that the link has been provided in at least four posts so far.
Well what are your thoughts about the video?
  #78  
Old Yesterday, 05:23 PM
BrianL99 BrianL99 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 3,704
Thanks: 298
Thanked 3,574 Times in 1,430 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99 View Post
You can keep saying the same thing over and over, it will still be wrong.

When you bought in The Villages, you bought a home with Deed Restrictions. The District was not a party to that transaction.

There is nothing inherently illegal about Deed Restrictions, provided they don't discriminate agains a protected class. Private transactions are not protected by the 1st Amendment, nor are "signs" protected by the 1st Amendment. If signs were protected by the 1st Amendment, cities and towns wouldn't be able to adopt sign regulations. The 1st Amendment is the Right of Free Speech ... it is not "The Right to Post and/or Carry Signs".
Quote:
Originally Posted by billlaur View Post
You should read the 1st amendment there are 5 elements to it….
I'm sorry my friend, but you obviously don't understand law nor the 1st Amendment.

There are (5) RIGHTS protected by the 1st amendment. None of those "rights" include an unlimited "right to post signage". nor is there anything in the 1st Amendment which prohibits Deed Restrictions.
__________________
"God made me and gave me the right to remain silent, but not the ability." Sen John Kennedy (R-La)
" ... and that Norm, is why some folks always feel smarter, when they sign onto TOTV after a few beers" adapted from Cliff Claven, 1/18/90
Reply

Tags
tresspassed, vets, sidewalks, public, roads


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 AM.