Tresspassed

Tresspassed

Notices

You are viewing a old design of the TOTV site. It will be disabled anytime. Click here to switch to the new version.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #136  
Old Yesterday, 08:57 AM
Road-Runner's Avatar
Road-Runner Road-Runner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Village of Bradford
Posts: 363
Thanks: 567
Thanked 329 Times in 163 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by billlaur View Post
Well you guessed wrong
Perhaps, that's what guesses are after all. Strange that I see people holding these signs up at the 44/Morse intersection all the time accepting money? I 'guess' those are just tips.
Reply With Quote

  #137  
Old Yesterday, 09:01 AM
Taltarzac725's Avatar
Taltarzac725 Taltarzac725 is offline
Sage
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 52,546
Thanks: 12,062
Thanked 4,218 Times in 2,556 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Road-Runner View Post
Perhaps, that's what guesses are after all. Strange that I see people holding these signs up at the 44/Morse intersection all the time accepting money? I 'guess' those are just tips.
That is a County road. Not outside the parking lot of the Villages' office with all the various tour buses going in-and-out of the parking lot.
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old Yesterday, 09:38 AM
Maker Maker is offline
Veteran member
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 650
Thanks: 13
Thanked 577 Times in 257 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99 View Post
The lesson here folks, is don't believe everything you read on the Internet. Do your own research, without an agenda, and find the truth.

Everyone who's bought a home in The Villages, has Deed Restrictions and Covenants they signed and agreed to. We all made an agreement with our Seller, who made a contract with the Developer. We're bound by.that contract, unless and until the State of Florida changes their statutes or some court issues a contrary opinion.

The truth be told, the vast majority of Villagers bought in TV, for just those reasons. We liked what it was like when we shopped and most of us would prefer it stays exactly as it was, the day we bought. Those who believe we shouldn't have rules and restrictions, shouldn't have bought here and should perhaps move somewhere else.
Some court (actually the supreme court) has already made a decision contrary to your OPINION. It is published with detailed examples and is quite clear, indisputable, and is in full force for the entire country (even here).

Why do YOU think you "speak for the vast majority" of anything? Who appointed your OPINION as the truth? We must have missed that election.

Therein lies the problem.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Maker For This Useful Post:
  #139  
Old Yesterday, 10:24 AM
BrianL99 BrianL99 is offline
Sage
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 3,752
Thanks: 299
Thanked 3,622 Times in 1,453 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maker View Post

As far as I am concerned, this issue is closed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maker View Post

Why do YOU think you "speak for the vast majority" of anything? Who appointed your OPINION as the truth? We must have missed that election.

Therein lies the problem.
Or not closed.

The problem arises in that some folks with an agenda, seem to think their interpretation of what they read, is the only interpretation.

I don't think you "missed the election". 70,000 property owners in The Villages have spoken. They chose to buy a home, with restricted rights and agreed to abide by those restrictions.

Not only did 70,000 folks agree, folks continue to do so every day, at an astounding rate.

Anyone who bought a home in The Villages, thinking the restrictions were going to be relaxed, is in the exact same boat as the woman who married me and thought I was going to change. It doesn't work that way.
__________________
"God made me and gave me the right to remain silent, but not the ability." Sen John Kennedy (R-La)
" ... and that Norm, is why some folks always feel smarter, when they sign onto TOTV after a few beers" adapted from Cliff Claven, 1/18/90
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BrianL99 For This Useful Post:
  #140  
Old Yesterday, 10:40 AM
Maker Maker is offline
Veteran member
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 650
Thanks: 13
Thanked 577 Times in 257 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99 View Post
Or not closed.

The problem arises in that some folks with an agenda, seem to think their interpretation of what they read, is the only interpretation.

I don't think you "missed the election". 70,000 property owners in The Villages have spoken. They chose to buy a home, with restricted rights and agreed to abide by those restrictions.

Not only did 70,000 folks agree, folks continue to do so every day, at an astounding rate.

Anyone who bought a home in The Villages, thinking the restrictions were going to be relaxed, is in the exact same boat as the woman who married me and thought I was going to change. It doesn't work that way.
Once again, you missed the point.
Agree somewhat that people LIKELY did not think the rules would change.
But SCOTUS did CHANGE the rules, and your opinion against that change has no standing. Ruling is done, and like it or not, the rules are now different. No matter how much you bring up ridiculous invalid examples (your opinions about what purchasers want, how your wife views your attitude), the ruling still wins.

Perhaps, since you disagree with SCOTUS, go petition them for a clarification.

Condolences to wife. I have some great associates that might help her out.
Go ahead and post again. You seem to like having the last word on everything.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Maker For This Useful Post:
  #141  
Old Yesterday, 10:45 AM
Taltarzac725's Avatar
Taltarzac725 Taltarzac725 is offline
Sage
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 52,546
Thanks: 12,062
Thanked 4,218 Times in 2,556 Posts
Default

I remember a Mexican -American couple or maybe of some other Hispanic heritage on the corner of Belvedere ( CR 101) and CR466 with a sign that they really needed work. They also had a quite young boy with them.


They were still there after I had done my grocery shopping.
Reply With Quote
  #142  
Old Yesterday, 10:49 AM
Taltarzac725's Avatar
Taltarzac725 Taltarzac725 is offline
Sage
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 52,546
Thanks: 12,062
Thanked 4,218 Times in 2,556 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maker View Post
Once again, you missed the point.
Agree somewhat that people LIKELY did not think the rules would change.
But SCOTUS did CHANGE the rules, and your opinion against that change has no standing. Ruling is done, and like it or not, the rules are now different. No matter how much you bring up ridiculous invalid examples (your opinions about what purchasers want, how your wife views your attitude), the ruling still wins.

Perhaps, since you disagree with SCOTUS, go petition them for a clarification.

Condolences to wife. I have some great associates that might help her out.
Go ahead and post again. You seem to like having the last word on everything.
SCOTUS is rarely clear about anything. They usually leave a lot of work for the lawyers and judges.


Yard signs | The First Amendment Encyclopedia

Last edited by Taltarzac725; Yesterday at 10:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Taltarzac725 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
tresspassed, vets, sidewalks, public, roads


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 PM.