Villages Nearing Build-out Villages Nearing Build-out - Page 3 - Talk of The Villages Florida

Villages Nearing Build-out

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 01-11-2014, 04:45 PM
maureenod maureenod is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

What I meant was that another developer will buy land and they will build. Lots of land for sale around TV.
  #32  
Old 03-10-2014, 10:32 AM
coolkayaker1's Avatar
coolkayaker1 coolkayaker1 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Geneva, IL
Posts: 124
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2BNTV View Post

It affects us, in that after build-out, is over...... whenever that may be, the price of resales will go up dramatically. If he continues building, the price of resales is going up, but maybe not as fast. Either way, we will win by having moved here.

IMHO
Or, when (not if) the Morses cease building, the most profitable "public" property (which is, in fact, owned by the single developer) is sold (to various strip mall owners, investors, etc.), fragmenting the long-term goals for The Villages (which is now quite unified: happy residents, money for developer), and public spaces (with little profitable value, e.g. town squares) are transferred back to current residents to manage and maintain (upkeep, insurance, etc.), then taxes and infrastructure fees to current residents climb, and home prices fall. Another realistic possibility.
  #33  
Old 03-10-2014, 10:41 AM
billethkid's Avatar
billethkid billethkid is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,536
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4,871 Times in 1,420 Posts
Default

The biggest future risk I see is if there ever becomes a time where the residents in some governing form become responsible for "managing" the daily goings on of TV.

Like it or not the developer has a goal and manages a consistency that for the most part we all accept. And also for the most part very little we as residents can do or say to sway the direction the developer has set.

When/if the residents take over is when special interests, politics, etc creep into the system thus departing from the overall state of TV. Eventually the goals of managing TV result in changing priorities that depart from the good of the whole.

So let's hope for the involvement of the developer in some fashion continues well into the future.
  #34  
Old 04-08-2014, 10:28 AM
coolkayaker1's Avatar
coolkayaker1 coolkayaker1 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Geneva, IL
Posts: 124
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

True, billethkid.
  #35  
Old 04-08-2014, 10:30 AM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,170
Thanks: 5,009
Thanked 5,783 Times in 2,004 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by billethkid View Post
The biggest future risk I see is if there ever becomes a time where the residents in some governing form become responsible for "managing" the daily goings on of TV.

Like it or not the developer has a goal and manages a consistency that for the most part we all accept. And also for the most part very little we as residents can do or say to sway the direction the developer has set.

When/if the residents take over is when special interests, politics, etc creep into the system thus departing from the overall state of TV. Eventually the goals of managing TV result in changing priorities that depart from the good of the whole.

So let's hope for the involvement of the developer in some fashion continues well into the future.


Amen
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
  #36  
Old 04-08-2014, 10:57 AM
samhass's Avatar
samhass samhass is offline
Sage
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,577
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by billethkid View Post
The biggest future risk I see is if there ever becomes a time where the residents in some governing form become responsible for "managing" the daily goings on of TV.

Like it or not the developer has a goal and manages a consistency that for the most part we all accept. And also for the most part very little we as residents can do or say to sway the direction the developer has set.

When/if the residents take over is when special interests, politics, etc creep into the system thus departing from the overall state of TV. Eventually the goals of managing TV result in changing priorities that depart from the good of the whole.

So let's hope for the involvement of the developer in some fashion continues well into the future.
__________________
The Villages, Florida
  #37  
Old 04-08-2014, 11:03 AM
Bonny's Avatar
Bonny Bonny is offline
Eternal Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Village of BonnyBrook
Posts: 4,322
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by billethkid View Post
The biggest future risk I see is if there ever becomes a time where the residents in some governing form become responsible for "managing" the daily goings on of TV.

Like it or not the developer has a goal and manages a consistency that for the most part we all accept. And also for the most part very little we as residents can do or say to sway the direction the developer has set.

When/if the residents take over is when special interests, politics, etc creep into the system thus departing from the overall state of TV. Eventually the goals of managing TV result in changing priorities that depart from the good of the whole.

So let's hope for the involvement of the developer in some fashion continues well into the future.
__________________
Troy, Rochester, Hazel Park, Harbor Beach, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  #38  
Old 04-08-2014, 01:37 PM
mulligan mulligan is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,989
Thanks: 17
Thanked 349 Times in 156 Posts
Default

The residents have already taken over some of the northern districts, and the mechanism is in place for that to happen all the way down to district #10. The fee/taxing system, and the administrative systems are in place to maintain the quality we now enjoy. All seem to be working fine.. Educate yourselves, folks. Learn about your government.
__________________
........American by birth....Union by choice
  #39  
Old 04-08-2014, 02:30 PM
jblum315's Avatar
jblum315 jblum315 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,879
Thanks: 1
Thanked 40 Times in 23 Posts
Default

My answer is that none of us will live long enough to see the "final buildout." Not Gary Morse and not any of us on TOTV.
__________________
. . .there is nothing better for people than to be happy and to enjoy themselves, and also that everyone should eat and drink, and find enjoyment in all his toil. . .
Ecclesiasites 3:12
  #40  
Old 04-08-2014, 02:34 PM
Bogie Shooter Bogie Shooter is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 19,756
Thanks: 13
Thanked 6,121 Times in 2,719 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by billethkid View Post
The biggest future risk I see is if there ever becomes a time where the residents in some governing form become responsible for "managing" the daily goings on of TV.

Like it or not the developer has a goal and manages a consistency that for the most part we all accept. And also for the most part very little we as residents can do or say to sway the direction the developer has set.

When/if the residents take over is when special interests, politics, etc creep into the system thus departing from the overall state of TV. Eventually the goals of managing TV result in changing priorities that depart from the good of the whole.

So let's hope for the involvement of the developer in some fashion continues well into the future.
So true, Obi-wan.
__________________
The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell.
“Only truth and transparency can guarantee freedom”, John McCain
  #41  
Old 04-08-2014, 02:58 PM
Chi-Town's Avatar
Chi-Town Chi-Town is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,506
Thanks: 192
Thanked 1,484 Times in 717 Posts
Default

Using the recent flower planting discussion as an example of a worse case scenario involving the residents takeover would go like this:

Changing the flowers three times a year instead of four is more desirable both esthetically and economically.

Changing the flowers twice a year is more economic.

Changing to year round ground cover works.

Mulch only.
  #42  
Old 04-08-2014, 03:19 PM
buzzy buzzy is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,162
Thanks: 0
Thanked 73 Times in 35 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Town View Post
Using the recent flower planting discussion as an example of a worse case scenario involving the residents takeover would go like this:

Changing the flowers three times a year instead of four is more desirable both esthetically and economically.

Changing the flowers twice a year is more economic.

Changing to year round ground cover works.

Mulch only.
Similar progression at our South FL condo. All the islands in the parking lot became gray mulch. The Board even took out the perennials so nothing had to be watered. I was on the Board, but not retired yet. My vote was useless against the cheapskates.
  #43  
Old 04-08-2014, 03:44 PM
jojo's Avatar
jojo jojo is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Amelia
Posts: 1,890
Thanks: 132
Thanked 166 Times in 95 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by billethkid View Post
The biggest future risk I see is if there ever becomes a time where the residents in some governing form become responsible for "managing" the daily goings on of TV.

Like it or not the developer has a goal and manages a consistency that for the most part we all accept. And also for the most part very little we as residents can do or say to sway the direction the developer has set.

When/if the residents take over is when special interests, politics, etc creep into the system thus departing from the overall state of TV. Eventually the goals of managing TV result in changing priorities that depart from the good of the whole.

So let's hope for the involvement of the developer in some fashion continues well into the future.
We can only hope.
__________________
Columbus OH, The Villages - Amelia
  #44  
Old 04-08-2014, 05:11 PM
CFrance's Avatar
CFrance CFrance is offline
Sage
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tamarind Grove/Monpazier, France
Posts: 14,708
Thanks: 390
Thanked 2,147 Times in 881 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barefoot View Post
We don't have any optimists on TOTV, you'll have to ask somewhere else.

Don't flame me, I'm kidding!

P.S. Welcome to the Forum!
__________________
It's harder to hate close up.
  #45  
Old 04-08-2014, 05:50 PM
Barefoot's Avatar
Barefoot Barefoot is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winters in TV, Summers in Canada.
Posts: 17,657
Thanks: 1,692
Thanked 245 Times in 186 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by billethkid View Post
The biggest future risk I see is if there ever becomes a time where the residents in some governing form become responsible for "managing" the daily goings on of TV. Like it or not the developer has a goal and manages a consistency that for the most part we all accept. And also for the most part very little we as residents can do or say to sway the direction the developer has set.

When/if the residents take over is when special interests, politics, etc creep into the system thus departing from the overall state of TV. Eventually the goals of managing TV result in changing priorities that depart from the good of the whole. So let's hope for the involvement of the developer in some fashion continues well into the future.
Well said BTK.
__________________
Barefoot At Last
No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Saving one dog will not change the world, but surely for that one dog, the world will change forever.
Closed Thread


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.