Walking in the danger zone!

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-23-2022, 09:11 AM
russtcc russtcc is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 134
Thanks: 4
Thanked 107 Times in 24 Posts
Default Walking in the danger zone!

This has come up before but the other morning while walking on a path (facing potential traffic) a gentleman on a bicycle decided to play chicken to see if I would move. When he finally pulled on the grass he informed I'm to walk with traffic. I explained that ever since I was run over by a bicycle with stiches to show for it I will face traffic when possible. We agreed to disagree.

Out of curiosity I did a Google search for pedestrian regulations in Florida. In turns out that in 2022 Florida state regulations, 316.130; Pedestrians; traffic regulations it clearly states if there is not a sidewalk when walking along a road the pedestrian is to walk on the left side facing traffic which may approach from the opposite direction.

I guess you can quibble as to what makes a road or highway but for me if anything with wheels is on that surface I'm on the left side. Walking on the right side with carts and bicycles coming behind me is like trusting everyone in a roundabout to stay in their lane! Below is a link to the regulations.

Statutes & Constitution
:View Statutes
:

Online Sunshine
  #2  
Old 08-23-2022, 09:18 AM
ohioshooter ohioshooter is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 487
Thanks: 30
Thanked 391 Times in 171 Posts
Default

My practice is if there is motorized vehicle traffic I walk against the traffic, if it's just walkers and bicycles I walk with traffic. I expect a cyclist coming up behind me to say "on your left". I said that to a walker the other day though and he went left in front of me. Claimed he hadn't had his coffee yet.
  #3  
Old 08-23-2022, 09:22 AM
Kenswing's Avatar
Kenswing Kenswing is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: We're Here!
Posts: 7,872
Thanks: 1,529
Thanked 6,014 Times in 2,428 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohioshooter View Post
My practice is if there is motorized vehicle traffic I walk against the traffic, if it's just walkers and bicycles I walk with traffic. I expect a cyclist coming up behind me to say "on your left". I said that to a walker the other day though and he went left in front of me. Claimed he hadn't had his coffee yet.
We have a walking/bike path behind our house. Things pretty much operate as you describe. We do get a few that insist on walking on the left but they are the exception and not the rule.
__________________
Birthdays Are Good For You. Statistics Show the More That You Have The Longer You Will Live..

We've Got Plenty Of Youth.. What We Need Is a Fountain Of SMART!
  #4  
Old 08-23-2022, 09:22 AM
Bogie Shooter Bogie Shooter is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 19,667
Thanks: 13
Thanked 6,031 Times in 2,681 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by russtcc View Post
This has come up before but the other morning while walking on a path (facing potential traffic) a gentleman on a bicycle decided to play chicken to see if I would move. When he finally pulled on the grass he informed I'm to walk with traffic. I explained that ever since I was run over by a bicycle with stiches to show for it I will face traffic when possible. We agreed to disagree.

Out of curiosity I did a Google search for pedestrian regulations in Florida. In turns out that in 2022 Florida state regulations, 316.130; Pedestrians; traffic regulations it clearly states if there is not a sidewalk when walking along a road the pedestrian is to walk on the left side facing traffic which may approach from the opposite direction.

I guess you can quibble as to what makes a road or highway but for me if anything with wheels is on that surface I'm on the left side. Walking on the right side with carts and bicycles coming behind me is like trusting everyone in a roundabout to stay in their lane! Below is a link to the regulations.

Statutes & Constitution
:View Statutes
:

Online Sunshine
This person did not pay attention in the second (I think) grade…..that’s where we learned that! Geesh!
__________________
The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell.
“Only truth and transparency can guarantee freedom”, John McCain
  #5  
Old 08-23-2022, 09:32 AM
DAVES DAVES is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,535
Thanks: 196
Thanked 1,920 Times in 984 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by russtcc View Post
This has come up before but the other morning while walking on a path (facing potential traffic) a gentleman on a bicycle decided to play chicken to see if I would move. When he finally pulled on the grass he informed I'm to walk with traffic. I explained that ever since I was run over by a bicycle with stiches to show for it I will face traffic when possible. We agreed to disagree.

Out of curiosity I did a Google search for pedestrian regulations in Florida. In turns out that in 2022 Florida state regulations, 316.130; Pedestrians; traffic regulations it clearly states if there is not a sidewalk when walking along a road the pedestrian is to walk on the left side facing traffic which may approach from the opposite direction.

I guess you can quibble as to what makes a road or highway but for me if anything with wheels is on that surface I'm on the left side. Walking on the right side with carts and bicycles coming behind me is like trusting everyone in a roundabout to stay in their lane! Below is a link to the regulations.

Statutes & Constitution
:View Statutes
:

Online Sunshine
As we all seem to regularly discover there are LAWS. Assuming that others around you KNOW the laws is a reach. Assuming they KNOW the laws AND WILL FOLLOW THEM is an even bigger reach
  #6  
Old 08-23-2022, 09:46 AM
DAVES DAVES is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,535
Thanks: 196
Thanked 1,920 Times in 984 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter View Post
This person did not pay attention in the second (I think) grade…..that’s where we learned that! Geesh!
Far as second grade. Basic psychology. About the age of two a baby discovers there are other people besides ME, ME, ME. The poster always reports they are right. There are obviously two sides to every story. Where it happened, we don't know. Was there other traffic around so that if the bicyclist went into the road, he/she was in danger, we do not know.

I ride a bike, walk, drive and have a golf cart. Bike rules are at best strange. At one time bikes were a major form of transportation. Horses cars and people is also like HUH? The villages-add in dogs, in outfits. in a stroller surely a HUH , HUH,HUH.
  #7  
Old 08-23-2022, 09:58 AM
DAVES DAVES is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,535
Thanks: 196
Thanked 1,920 Times in 984 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohioshooter View Post
My practice is if there is motorized vehicle traffic I walk against the traffic, if it's just walkers and bicycles I walk with traffic. I expect a cyclist coming up behind me to say "on your left". I said that to a walker the other day though and he went left in front of me. Claimed he hadn't had his coffee yet.
As far as shouting on your left. It is perhaps a practice in other places. In the villages it will often get you, a snarl, a, hand gesture, that is not a turn signal in Florida is it, or a panic response-several people scattering all over the place blocking how you planed to go around them.

As posted previously assuming others know the law and will follow it is a reach. The LAW is
bicycles are SUPPOSED to travel WITH traffic. Walkers are SUPPOSED TO walk facing traffic.
  #8  
Old 08-23-2022, 10:36 AM
fdpaq0580 fdpaq0580 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,931
Thanks: 355
Thanked 5,053 Times in 2,148 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAVES View Post
As far as shouting on your left. It is perhaps a practice in other places. In the villages it will often get you, a snarl, a, hand gesture, that is not a turn signal in Florida is it, or a panic response-several people scattering all over the place blocking how you planed to go around them.

As posted previously assuming others know the law and will follow it is a reach. The LAW is
bicycles are SUPPOSED to travel WITH traffic. Walkers are SUPPOSED TO walk facing traffic.
Yep! Always walk facing traffic. It is the safest option. Particularly considering the possibility/probability that the walker may be hearing impaired. "On your left" ! Do they hear you? Do they understand what you said? Who are you shouting at?
Always walk facing traffic.
  #9  
Old 08-23-2022, 10:39 AM
ohioshooter ohioshooter is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 487
Thanks: 30
Thanked 391 Times in 171 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAVES View Post
As far as shouting on your left. It is perhaps a practice in other places. In the villages it will often get you, a snarl, a, hand gesture, that is not a turn signal in Florida is it, or a panic response-several people scattering all over the place blocking how you planed to go around them.

As posted previously assuming others know the law and will follow it is a reach. The LAW is
bicycles are SUPPOSED to travel WITH traffic. Walkers are SUPPOSED TO walk facing traffic.
I believe you are talking about walking on a road. The law that was quoted says “if there is not a sidewalk “. I would consider a walking biking path as a sidewalk. That’s all I have to say.
  #10  
Old 08-23-2022, 10:40 AM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is online now
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 6,878
Thanks: 2,112
Thanked 7,293 Times in 2,850 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAVES View Post
As far as shouting on your left. It is perhaps a practice in other places. In the villages it will often get you, a snarl, a, hand gesture, that is not a turn signal in Florida is it, or a panic response-several people scattering all over the place blocking how you planed to go around them.

As posted previously assuming others know the law and will follow it is a reach. The LAW is
bicycles are SUPPOSED to travel WITH traffic. Walkers are SUPPOSED TO walk facing traffic.
Yes, on a road ALWAYS walk facing motorized traffic. On a sidewalk or other walking path, walk on the right.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough
  #11  
Old 08-23-2022, 10:45 AM
fdpaq0580 fdpaq0580 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,931
Thanks: 355
Thanked 5,053 Times in 2,148 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by russtcc View Post
This has come up before but the other morning while walking on a path (facing potential traffic) a gentleman on a bicycle decided to play chicken to see if I would move. When he finally pulled on the grass he informed I'm to walk with traffic. [/url]
I disagree with your characterisation of the cyclist. He is definitely not a gentleman. Oh, and he was wrong.
  #12  
Old 08-23-2022, 12:31 PM
JohnN's Avatar
JohnN JohnN is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,732
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1,855 Times in 678 Posts
Default

Walk against the traffic, ride with the traffic. That said, you need to be on the lookout for everybody.
And I don't play chicken with anyone, too many nutjobs out there.
  #13  
Old 08-23-2022, 12:38 PM
Djean1981 Djean1981 is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Villages
Posts: 771
Thanks: 6,480
Thanked 843 Times in 336 Posts
Default

Yeah, I wouldn't walk with my back to traffic. Too many bad drivers.
  #14  
Old 08-23-2022, 12:58 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is online now
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 6,878
Thanks: 2,112
Thanked 7,293 Times in 2,850 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fdpaq0580 View Post
I disagree with your characterisation of the cyclist. He is definitely not a gentleman. Oh, and he was wrong.
On a path the bicyclist was right.

The walker was already not where he belonged. As a cyclist I would have been wary of what he was going to do next. He was blocking my side of the path but if I tried to go around him would he then move towards his side of the path and cause a collision? It's either roll the dice and hope for the best or stop and try to explain why the walker should not have been walking on the left. The cyclist chose option B but apparently the walker is too stuck in his ways to appreciate the good advice.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough
  #15  
Old 08-23-2022, 01:25 PM
mtdjed mtdjed is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,530
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1,228 Times in 427 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohioshooter View Post
I believe you are talking about walking on a road. The law that was quoted says “if there is not a sidewalk “. I would consider a walking biking path as a sidewalk. That’s all I have to say.
What does a sidewalk imply? I was always under the impression that you shouldn't be riding a bicycle on a "sidewalk". I believe the paths harboring walkers, bikers and golf carts are multi Modal paths. If I see a golf cart on the path, then I walk to face it. If the next vehicle I see is a bicycle, I expect that to be traveling in the right lane as the golf cart was. I would be on the same side facing it.
Closed Thread

Tags
traffic, walking, regulations, side, pedestrian


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 AM.