What Will The Apartments Look Like? What Will The Apartments Look Like? - Talk of The Villages Florida

What Will The Apartments Look Like?

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-13-2020, 08:11 AM
Villages Kahuna's Avatar
Villages Kahuna Villages Kahuna is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seventeen-year Villager
Posts: 3,892
Thanks: 16
Thanked 1,132 Times in 418 Posts
Default What Will The Apartments Look Like?

Have we thought much about what the new apartments proposed by the Developer might look like? Consider the following...

In round numbers a 286-unit apartment building will almost certainly be larger than the independent living building at Freedom Pointe (the taller, larger building west of the Morse-El Camino Real traffic circle). Certainly it would have to be taller.

Freedom Pointe (FP) has 247 studio, one and two-bedroom apartments. The mix is towards the smaller units. None of the FP apartments has a balcony. The average size of the FP apartments is approximately 1,100 sq. ft. In addition, FP has a parking garage holding approximately 250 cars with similar space devoted to surface parking.

The FP residential building has a large dining room and roughly half of one floor devoted to resident amenities (reception desk, lobby, mail room, indoor pool, ballroom, workout facility, library, billiards, meeting rooms, wood shop, activities room, barber-beauty salon and offices). There is an enclosed grassy area with a gazebo and an outside enclosed dog park. The building has several elevator banks and a large receiving dock.

The Freedom Pointe building is four floors throughout with smaller parts being five, six and seven stories high.

The Villages-proposed apartments will almost certainly be larger than those at Freedom Pointe, more like the size of those of the Brownwood Lofts, estimated to average 1500-1700 sq.ft. They will also likely have balconies like the apartments at Brownwood. The additional size of the Hacienda Hills apartments will likely be offset by less space devoted to activities amenities such as at Freedom Pointe. The space devoted to the FP dining room and a new restaurant will be roughly equal.

It’s probably safe to say that given these assumptions, the proposed 286-unit apartment building on the former clubhouse-restaurant site would have to be 10-12 stories tall and require an underground parking facility to house a car and golf cart for each apartment. If the resort-style pool Is planned near the new apartments, that would require more space.

Will a building of that size fit on the parcel recently cleared of the Hacienda Hills clubhouse-restaurant-pool-putting green? That’s something for all of us to think about. If the Developer’s plans are for lower buildings, where would they go? How about the necessary surface parking?

Can that size project along with resort pool, nature trails and other amenities fit on the space recently cleared?

Or do the plans assume the closure of one of the Hacienda Hills nine hole courses? Was that discussed at the meeting yesterday?

The Developer was not obligated to share project plans with the AAC. All they were asking for was AAC approval of 300 new resident amenities cards. They own the property and can do whatever they choose with it.

The approval of the required zoning changes, impact studies, plan approval, etc. is for the county board to consider. All that’s certain is that we’ll be living with the result.
__________________
Politicians are like diapers--they should be changed frequently, and for the same reason.

Last edited by Villages Kahuna; 08-13-2020 at 08:25 AM.
  #2  
Old 08-13-2020, 08:47 AM
tophcfa's Avatar
tophcfa tophcfa is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
Posts: 7,680
Thanks: 3,596
Thanked 11,220 Times in 3,560 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Villages Kahuna View Post
Have we thought much about what the new apartments proposed by the Developer might look like? Consider the following...

In round numbers a 286-unit apartment building will almost certainly be larger than the independent living building at Freedom Pointe (the taller, larger building west of the Morse-El Camino Real traffic circle). Certainly it would have to be taller.

Freedom Pointe (FP) has 247 studio, one and two-bedroom apartments. The mix is towards the smaller units. None of the FP apartments has a balcony. The average size of the FP apartments is approximately 1,100 sq. ft. In addition, FP has a parking garage holding approximately 250 cars with similar space devoted to surface parking.

The FP residential building has a large dining room and roughly half of one floor devoted to resident amenities (reception desk, lobby, mail room, indoor pool, ballroom, workout facility, library, billiards, meeting rooms, wood shop, activities room, barber-beauty salon and offices). There is an enclosed grassy area with a gazebo and an outside enclosed dog park. The building has several elevator banks and a large receiving dock.

The Freedom Pointe building is four floors throughout with smaller parts being five, six and seven stories high.

The Villages-proposed apartments will almost certainly be larger than those at Freedom Pointe, more like the size of those of the Brownwood Lofts, estimated to average 1500-1700 sq.ft. They will also likely have balconies like the apartments at Brownwood. The additional size of the Hacienda Hills apartments will likely be offset by less space devoted to activities amenities such as at Freedom Pointe. The space devoted to the FP dining room and a new restaurant will be roughly equal.

It’s probably safe to say that given these assumptions, the proposed 286-unit apartment building on the former clubhouse-restaurant site would have to be 10-12 stories tall and require an underground parking facility to house a car and golf cart for each apartment. If the resort-style pool Is planned near the new apartments, that would require more space.

Will a building of that size fit on the parcel recently cleared of the Hacienda Hills clubhouse-restaurant-pool-putting green? That’s something for all of us to think about. If the Developer’s plans are for lower buildings, where would they go? How about the necessary surface parking?

Can that size project along with resort pool, nature trails and other amenities fit on the space recently cleared?

Or do the plans assume the closure of one of the Hacienda Hills nine hole courses? Was that discussed at the meeting yesterday?

The Developer was not obligated to share project plans with the AAC. All they were asking for was AAC approval of 300 new resident amenities cards. They own the property and can do whatever they choose with it.

The approval of the required zoning changes, impact studies, plan approval, etc. is for the county board to consider. All that’s certain is that we’ll be living with the result.
Well thought out. I fear that space limitations will result in the elimination of Championship golf. That will be a significant game changer for many residents, and send a very loud and clear message to anyone considering paying a premium to purchase a home on a golf course anywhere in the Villages. My only saving hope is that at least some of the newer golf courses were designed as flood plains of last resort. I am not sure if Hacienda falls into this category, but if so it might prevent certain types of construction on the land?
  #3  
Old 08-13-2020, 03:47 PM
deano_hoosier deano_hoosier is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 344
Thanks: 14
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Using Google Maps to measure rough envelop size. Freedom Point looks to be 380 ft x 500 ft. Using same approach on HH building space you could fit in a 230 x 750 footprint, so it seems possible to fit it in. This would still leave the practice putting green in its location. Then there is more space available if you work around the golf cart storage area, external restroom facility, as well.
__________________
Columbus, IN and Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD
  #4  
Old 08-13-2020, 04:27 PM
LuvtheVillages LuvtheVillages is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Tamarind Grove
Posts: 549
Thanks: 251
Thanked 790 Times in 249 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Villages Kahuna View Post
Have we thought much about what the new apartments proposed by the Developer might look like?

They own the property and can do whatever they choose with it.

The approval of the required zoning changes, impact studies, plan approval, etc. is for the county board to consider. All that’s certain is that we’ll be living with the result.

I wonder if the Developer plans to ram through the zoning changes quick before any new commissioners take their seat?

When do the new commissioners get seated? After the November election? After first of year?
  #5  
Old 08-13-2020, 04:38 PM
Jayhawk's Avatar
Jayhawk Jayhawk is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,569
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1,896 Times in 561 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Villages Kahuna View Post

The Villages-proposed apartments will almost certainly be larger than those at Freedom Pointe, more like the size of those of the Brownwood Lofts, estimated to average 1500-1700 sq.ft.

It’s probably safe to say that given these assumptions, the proposed 286-unit apartment building on the former clubhouse-restaurant site would have to be 10-12 stories tall and require an underground parking facility to house a car and golf cart for each apartment. If the resort-style pool Is planned near the new apartments, that would require more space.

Will a building of that size fit on the parcel recently cleared of the Hacienda Hills clubhouse-restaurant-pool-putting green? That’s something for all of us to think about. If the Developer’s plans are for lower buildings, where would they go? How about the necessary surface parking?

Can that size project along with resort pool, nature trails and other amenities fit on the space recently cleared?

Or do the plans assume the closure of one of the Hacienda Hills nine hole courses? Was that discussed at the meeting yesterday?

The Developer was not obligated to share project plans with the AAC. All they were asking for was AAC approval of 300 new resident amenities cards. They own the property and can do whatever they choose with it.

The approval of the required zoning changes, impact studies, plan approval, etc. is for the county board to consider. All that’s certain is that we’ll be living with the result.
That's a lot of uneducated assumptions, starting with the fact that the smallest Brownwood Loft homes are 755 square feet and the very largest 3 BR is 1548 square feet. Nowhere near an average of 1500-1700 as you surmised.
  #6  
Old 08-13-2020, 06:57 PM
CanTho CanTho is offline
Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 98
Thanks: 0
Thanked 117 Times in 36 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Villages Kahuna View Post
Have we thought much about what the new apartments proposed by the Developer might look like? Consider the following...

In round numbers a 286-unit apartment building will almost certainly be larger than the independent living building at Freedom Pointe (the taller, larger building west of the Morse-El Camino Real traffic circle). Certainly it would have to be taller.

Freedom Pointe (FP) has 247 studio, one and two-bedroom apartments. The mix is towards the smaller units. None of the FP apartments has a balcony. The average size of the FP apartments is approximately 1,100 sq. ft. In addition, FP has a parking garage holding approximately 250 cars with similar space devoted to surface parking.

The FP residential building has a large dining room and roughly half of one floor devoted to resident amenities (reception desk, lobby, mail room, indoor pool, ballroom, workout facility, library, billiards, meeting rooms, wood shop, activities room, barber-beauty salon and offices). There is an enclosed grassy area with a gazebo and an outside enclosed dog park. The building has several elevator banks and a large receiving dock.

The Freedom Pointe building is four floors throughout with smaller parts being five, six and seven stories high.

The Villages-proposed apartments will almost certainly be larger than those at Freedom Pointe, more like the size of those of the Brownwood Lofts, estimated to average 1500-1700 sq.ft. They will also likely have balconies like the apartments at Brownwood. The additional size of the Hacienda Hills apartments will likely be offset by less space devoted to activities amenities such as at Freedom Pointe. The space devoted to the FP dining room and a new restaurant will be roughly equal.

It’s probably safe to say that given these assumptions, the proposed 286-unit apartment building on the former clubhouse-restaurant site would have to be 10-12 stories tall and require an underground parking facility to house a car and golf cart for each apartment. If the resort-style pool Is planned near the new apartments, that would require more space.

Will a building of that size fit on the parcel recently cleared of the Hacienda Hills clubhouse-restaurant-pool-putting green? That’s something for all of us to think about. If the Developer’s plans are for lower buildings, where would they go? How about the necessary surface parking?

Can that size project along with resort pool, nature trails and other amenities fit on the space recently cleared?

Or do the plans assume the closure of one of the Hacienda Hills nine hole courses? Was that discussed at the meeting yesterday?

The Developer was not obligated to share project plans with the AAC. All they were asking for was AAC approval of 300 new resident amenities cards. They own the property and can do whatever they choose with it.

The approval of the required zoning changes, impact studies, plan approval, etc. is for the county board to consider. All that’s certain is that we’ll be living with the result.
Very well written and well thought out.

My comment is the developer already got his ducks in order and ready to build.

Does he have a " Plan B " ? Nope absolutely not, their is no need, Game - Set - Match.

Bottom line it's business strictly business.

As for the people who live in that area get use to it or move.
  #7  
Old 08-13-2020, 10:04 PM
tophcfa's Avatar
tophcfa tophcfa is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
Posts: 7,680
Thanks: 3,596
Thanked 11,220 Times in 3,560 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CanTho View Post

Very well written and well thought out.

My comment is the developer already got his ducks in order and ready to build.

Does he have a " Plan B " ? Nope absolutely not, their is no need, Game - Set - Match.

Bottom line it's business strictly business.

As for the people who live in that area get use to it or move.
I agree with your post, but feel a couple of things need to be added to put things into proper perspective.

The developers plan "B" was to present something much worse than the already bad plan that they shoved down the throats of everyone living in the area. And yes, there was really no need for a plan "B", because the developer has removed all reasonable checks and balances to their powers, making their wishes our demands. As you say, their plan is game, set, match. Screw the existing homeowners, we are on to the next source of profit.

As far as the last point, that one is very sad, but true. "Get used to it or move" you say. It appears that is what the utopia that Harold Schwartz and Gary Morse created has come to? You would think that the generation of the Morse family, the three siblings that each inherited a BILLION DOLLARS when Gary passed on, would recognize that the GOOD WILL created by their vision was not derived by trying to squees water out of a rock. Harold and Gary understood that if you listen to your clients, and cater to their needs, it will create good will and enough corresponding profits to make you rich beyond your wildest dreams. The new generation is burning up the goodwill off of the family balance sheet at an astronomical pace. I can only hope that they don't totally wipe out the great place they were so fortunate to inherit in our lifetimes.
  #8  
Old 08-14-2020, 04:01 AM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,170
Thanks: 5,009
Thanked 5,783 Times in 2,004 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tophcfa View Post
I agree with your post, but feel a couple of things need to be added to put things into proper perspective.

The developers plan "B" was to present something much worse than the already bad plan that they shoved down the throats of everyone living in the area. And yes, there was really no need for a plan "B", because the developer has removed all reasonable checks and balances to their powers, making their wishes our demands. As you say, their plan is game, set, match. Screw the existing homeowners, we are on to the next source of profit.

As far as the last point, that one is very sad, but true. "Get used to it or move" you say. It appears that is what the utopia that Harold Schwartz and Gary Morse created has come to? You would think that the generation of the Morse family, the three siblings that each inherited a BILLION DOLLARS when Gary passed on, would recognize that the GOOD WILL created by their vision was not derived by trying to squees water out of a rock. Harold and Gary understood that if you listen to your clients, and cater to their needs, it will create good will and enough corresponding profits to make you rich beyond your wildest dreams. The new generation is burning up the goodwill off of the family balance sheet at an astronomical pace. I can only hope that they don't totally wipe out the great place they were so fortunate to inherit in our lifetimes.
When this is completed and works out well and is not an eyesore I hope some of the posters will acknowledge it on this Forum.

Given a choice most people would opt for housing nicely done for those getting older than a big box store.

All of the restaurants so far in "Country Clubs" that have failed is an indication that they were not financially supported and people didn't like them and eat there enough to keep them going. People say they want this or that but it is market driven if it succeeds or fails. Restaurants are very tenuous businesses. I wouldn't be surprised to see that Orange Blossom and some of those South of 466A fail too in a year or two.

I don't think the theater that is "the toy of the developers children" will make it either. And we will have another empty building for people to fight about.

Out in the real world restaurants in Country Clubs have not done well historically. Thank Goodness we aren't being charged for food we don't eat like some members of private country clubs have been in the past. I used to enjoy Cane Garden, but not so much anymore.

Villagers want good for cheap. That is hard to provide and will get worse with the beating the economy is taking due to the Pandemic.
__________________
It is better to laugh than to cry.
  #9  
Old 08-14-2020, 04:11 AM
Two Bills Two Bills is offline
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,342
Thanks: 1,811
Thanked 8,105 Times in 2,842 Posts
Default

The family did not hold on to all the Championship Courses and Country Clubs because they like cutting grass, and cooking.
They are the biggest areas for future development, and as shown, given half a chance, they will develop.
Bigtime!
  #10  
Old 08-14-2020, 04:51 AM
Cherylmcdaniel Cherylmcdaniel is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 10
Thanks: 9
Thanked 36 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Just a thought, many folks in The Villages do not want to move, apartment living is a nice transition and still close to their friends, shopping, dr.s, etc. I have only seen how beautiful the designs, landscaping, etc is done in each project. Many CC restaurants have failed as mentioned above, retirees needs are changing, A failed falling down building is not what I want in my backyard. Please be nice!
  #11  
Old 08-14-2020, 05:58 AM
CanTho CanTho is offline
Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 98
Thanks: 0
Thanked 117 Times in 36 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by graciegirl View Post
When this is completed and works out well and is not an eyesore I hope some of the posters will acknowledge it on this Forum.

Given a choice most people would opt for housing nicely done for those getting older than a big box store.

All of the restaurants so far in "Country Clubs" that have failed is an indication that they were not financially supported and people didn't like them and eat there enough to keep them going. People say they want this or that but it is market driven if it succeeds or fails. Restaurants are very tenuous businesses. I wouldn't be surprised to see that Orange Blossom and some of those South of 466A fail too in a year or two.

I don't think the theater that is "the toy of the developers children" will make it either. And we will have another empty building for people to fight about.

Out in the real world restaurants in Country Clubs have not done well historically. Thank Goodness we aren't being charged for food we don't eat like some members of private country clubs have been in the past. I used to enjoy Cane Garden, but not so much anymore.

Villagers want good for cheap. That is hard to provide and will get worse with the beating the economy is taking due to the Pandemic.
I do like your post, and what you have stated makes sense.

Everything that the developer does looks fantastic and I am certain that the apartments and the area will be very nice.

Times have changed and the " Toy " that you are referring to I take that it is " The Sharon ". You might be right. However once a vaccine for Covid-19 comes out all bets are off.

The Brownwood area looks terrific, plus the Hotel and Medical facility next to it is fabulous, all the planning from the Morse family.

So residents in the area I wouldn't be concerned in the slightest.

It will turn out to be just fine.
  #12  
Old 08-14-2020, 06:14 AM
riley2011 riley2011 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 127
Thanks: 276
Thanked 184 Times in 73 Posts
Default Can’t wait for all the extra traffic these apartments will bring.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Villages Kahuna View Post
Have we thought much about what the new apartments proposed by the Developer might look like? Consider the following...

In round numbers a 286-unit apartment building will almost certainly be larger than the independent living building at Freedom Pointe (the taller, larger building west of the Morse-El Camino Real traffic circle). Certainly it would have to be taller.

Freedom Pointe (FP) has 247 studio, one and two-bedroom apartments. The mix is towards the smaller units. None of the FP apartments has a balcony. The average size of the FP apartments is approximately 1,100 sq. ft. In addition, FP has a parking garage holding approximately 250 cars with similar space devoted to surface parking.

The FP residential building has a large dining room and roughly half of one floor devoted to resident amenities (reception desk, lobby, mail room, indoor pool, ballroom, workout facility, library, billiards, meeting rooms, wood shop, activities room, barber-beauty salon and offices). There is an enclosed grassy area with a gazebo and an outside enclosed dog park. The building has several elevator banks and a large receiving dock.

The Freedom Pointe building is four floors throughout with smaller parts being five, six and seven stories high.

The Villages-proposed apartments will almost certainly be larger than those at Freedom Pointe, more like the size of those of the Brownwood Lofts, estimated to average 1500-1700 sq.ft. They will also likely have balconies like the apartments at Brownwood. The additional size of the Hacienda Hills apartments will likely be offset by less space devoted to activities amenities such as at Freedom Pointe. The space devoted to the FP dining room and a new restaurant will be roughly equal.

It’s probably safe to say that given these assumptions, the proposed 286-unit apartment building on the former clubhouse-restaurant site would have to be 10-12 stories tall and require an underground parking facility to house a car and golf cart for each apartment. If the resort-style pool Is planned near the new apartments, that would require more space.

Will a building of that size fit on the parcel recently cleared of the Hacienda Hills clubhouse-restaurant-pool-putting green? That’s something for all of us to think about. If the Developer’s plans are for lower buildings, where would they go? How about the necessary surface parking?

Can that size project along with resort pool, nature trails and other amenities fit on the space recently cleared?

Or do the plans assume the closure of one of the Hacienda Hills nine hole courses? Was that discussed at the meeting yesterday?

The Developer was not obligated to share project plans with the AAC. All they were asking for was AAC approval of 300 new resident amenities cards. They own the property and can do whatever they choose with it.

The approval of the required zoning changes, impact studies, plan approval, etc. is for the county board to consider. All that’s certain is that we’ll be living with the result.
Can’t wait for all the extra traffic these apartments will bring. We don’t have enough yet.
  #13  
Old 08-14-2020, 06:47 AM
Dlbonivich Dlbonivich is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 322
Thanks: 44
Thanked 254 Times in 135 Posts
Default

The apartments were plan B. The residents did not want to buy Hacienda do the developer moved on. This should be a lesson for the future.
  #14  
Old 08-14-2020, 06:50 AM
OrangeBlossomBaby OrangeBlossomBaby is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 10,345
Thanks: 8,294
Thanked 11,509 Times in 3,872 Posts
Default

I have no doubt that whatever the developer does, they'll make it look beautiful.

I worry about the traffic.

That's my #1 worry. It is WAY too close to rte 441 and the Morse circle and the hospital to accommodate another 300 residential units. As someone who has to drive across the Boone gate several times every week for work at various hours in each direction, I can tell you there are times when traffic is backed up and potentially hazardous. Especially when an ambulance or other emergency vehicle has to rush through.

These intersections were not planned to accommodate that much traffic. I don't feel it is safe for the developer to expect these intersections to bear even more.
  #15  
Old 08-14-2020, 06:50 AM
TandHSTAR@AOL.com TandHSTAR@AOL.com is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 212
Thanks: 31
Thanked 149 Times in 84 Posts
Default

Thank you. I have always said people want good but do not want to pay for it. Restaurants fail because people want more than they want to.pay for. Just read some of the requests.... I am looking for a good whatever but at a reasonable price. People you get what you pay for.
Closed Thread

Tags
apartments, building, space, freedom, size


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 AM.