Why are the taxpayers, and not the developer, paying for the expansion of the village

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #151  
Old 10-02-2019, 09:13 PM
Northwoods Northwoods is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 890
Thanks: 56
Thanked 1,212 Times in 351 Posts
Default

I love living here. I think The Developer has created an amazing place to live. I don't have an issue with The Developer making money. BUT - I don't want to pay more than my fair share. Do I think "government" in Sumter County could use a little more oversight and "scrutiny"? Yes. I think The Developer might not be paying their fair share. But do I want to replace current Commissioners with people who want to screw the Developer at every turn? No.
So I want to make sure I vote for people who are knowledgeable about government. Know how to be fair and reasonable. Know how to negotiate.
  #152  
Old 10-02-2019, 09:50 PM
PrudentLifer PrudentLifer is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: The Villages, Florida
Posts: 196
Thanks: 44
Thanked 66 Times in 50 Posts
Default Why are the taxpayers, and not the developer, paying for the expansion of the village

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carla B View Post
Yes, and affordable housing for the workforce required to run this vast place hasn't kept up.


That's about to change with the vast amount of housing planned across from Pinellas Plaza on 466A.

Last edited by PrudentLifer; 10-02-2019 at 10:04 PM.
  #153  
Old 10-03-2019, 02:23 AM
Challenger's Avatar
Challenger Challenger is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,264
Thanks: 56
Thanked 370 Times in 163 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northwoods View Post
I love living here. I think The Developer has created an amazing place to live. I don't have an issue with The Developer making money. BUT - I don't want to pay more than my fair share. Do I think "government" in Sumter County could use a little more oversight and "scrutiny"? Yes. I think The Developer might not be paying their fair share. But do I want to replace current Commissioners with people who want to screw the Developer at every turn? No.
So I want to make sure I vote for people who are knowledgeable about government. Know how to be fair and reasonable. Know how to negotiate.
entirely too reasonable. Try again.
__________________
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" Edmund Burke 1729-1797
  #154  
Old 10-03-2019, 04:28 AM
Two Bills Two Bills is offline
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 5,699
Thanks: 1,686
Thanked 7,371 Times in 2,517 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eyc234 View Post
Did not get hit with 25%, only 12 and had 15 years of no increases. Taxes are still lower than a majority of places. When you vote them out you will still have the same issue, not enough money to run the county. If you raise the fee on the developer you raise the fee on all builders. I am sure the small builders will love that.
I thought the argument was to raise the Developer's fee to nearer what the small builder has to pay?
  #155  
Old 10-03-2019, 06:05 AM
Love2Swim Love2Swim is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 806
Thanks: 1,031
Thanked 811 Times in 275 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northwoods View Post
I love living here. I think The Developer has created an amazing place to live. I don't have an issue with The Developer making money. BUT - I don't want to pay more than my fair share. Do I think "government" in Sumter County could use a little more oversight and "scrutiny"? Yes. I think The Developer might not be paying their fair share. But do I want to replace current Commissioners with people who want to screw the Developer at every turn? No.
So I want to make sure I vote for people who are knowledgeable about government. Know how to be fair and reasonable. Know how to negotiate.
I don't think a single person wants to vote in people who want to "screw the developer" at every turn. But we'd like to have people who will represent US and have OUR interests at heart, not the developer's.
  #156  
Old 10-03-2019, 06:58 AM
dewilson58's Avatar
dewilson58 dewilson58 is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2013
Location: South of 466a, if you don't like me.......I live in Orlando.
Posts: 11,592
Thanks: 851
Thanked 9,777 Times in 3,645 Posts
Default

Realistically Impact Fees don't impact the Developer.


IF the Impact Fee tripled, the Developer would just increase the price of the new houses by $2k. This would not slow sales. Every house in Southern Oaks would have sold if the price was $2k higher.


The Developer will make their 30% margin with a $1,000 Impact Fee or a $3,000 Impact Fee. It has nothing to do with Developer greed...............they will make their margins and they will continue to sell their new homes.


A friend is moving from an area by 466a to Southern Oaks. They have signed on the line. Construction will not start until February. What a great back-log. $2,000 additional fee would not have impacted the Developer.


Look for greed, controlling the commissioner, fraud some where else.




__________________
Identifying as Mr. Helpful
  #157  
Old 10-03-2019, 07:01 AM
eyc234 eyc234 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 383
Thanks: 1,230
Thanked 412 Times in 150 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Love2Swim View Post
I don't think a single person wants to vote in people who want to "screw the developer" at every turn. But we'd like to have people who will represent US and have OUR interests at heart, not the developer's.
I would think citizens would be looking for people that are fair on both sides of the fence. Looking at the facts, the needs of all and working for the best compromise that will benefit the most for society as a whole. That is an extremely tall order now days but we can dream.
  #158  
Old 10-03-2019, 07:19 AM
Advogado Advogado is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,032
Thanks: 62
Thanked 685 Times in 229 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dewilson58 View Post
Realistically Impact Fees don't impact the Developer.


IF the Impact Fee tripled, the Developer would just increase the price of the new houses by $2k. This would not slow sales. Every house in Southern Oaks would have sold if the price was $2k higher.


The Developer will make their 30% margin with a $1,000 Impact Fee or a $3,000 Impact Fee. It has nothing to do with Developer greed...............they will make their margins and they will continue to sell their new homes.


A friend is moving from an area by 466a to Southern Oaks. They have signed on the line. Construction will not start until February. What a great back-log. $2,000 additional fee would not have impacted the Developer.


Look for greed, controlling the commissioner, fraud some where else.




I'm not sure where you studied economics or ran a business, but before retirement you must have lived in a communist country. In a capitalistic one, competition prevents a seller from simply upping his price to cover increased costs.

The Developer would have had to absorb some or all of the increased impact fees. That is why he had his County Commissioners raise our taxes instead of his impact fees.

In any event, no matter how much of the fees he would have had to absorb, the cost of the increased infrastructure would not have fallen on the existing Sumter County taxpayers.
  #159  
Old 10-03-2019, 07:25 AM
bonrich's Avatar
bonrich bonrich is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bemus Point, NY, Village of Sanibel
Posts: 582
Thanks: 0
Thanked 151 Times in 68 Posts
Default

Then there those of us who are not full time residents of Florida, some by choice and others by personal obligations. We have to pay the same taxes as residents and because we cannot get the Homestead deduction, pay more. Our costs to live here, albeit part time, still go on when we are away from Florida. Resident and nonresident costs continue no matter where you live. We have no say in what is going on in Sumter County as far as taxes, Commissioners, etc. We are the flotsam and jetsam of Sumter County, equal in all, but no say in our future and have to live with what is decided by full timers. All those potential votes that cannot be counted, but the money we pay for the taxes are.
Frustrating is one word to use...…..
  #160  
Old 10-03-2019, 07:30 AM
OrangeBlossomBaby OrangeBlossomBaby is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,535
Thanks: 6,875
Thanked 9,515 Times in 3,106 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Advogado View Post
I'm not sure where you studied economics or ran a business, but before retirement you must have lived in a communist country. In a capitalistic one, competition prevents a seller from simply upping his price to cover increased costs.

The Developer would have had to absorb some or all of the increased impact fees. That is why he had his County Commissioners raise our taxes instead of his impact fees.

In any event, no matter how much of the fees he would have had to absorb, the cost of the increased infrastructure would not have fallen on the existing Sumter County taxpayers.
I think you're both missing the point. Raising an impact fee to $2000 gets passed to the homeowner. That's fine. The homeowner is now on the hook for an extra $1100 (since there's already a $900 fee built in).

So when he buys the home, then $2000 of the sales price covers the cost of the impact fee. No biggie. Why? Here's why:

Compare to the TAX INCREASE:

The homeowner now pays an extra $xxx (average almost $400) PER YEAR until he sells his home. If he lives in that home 10 years, he's just paid (an average of) $4000 for the same "cost" that the developer would have only paid $2000 for.

The homeowner gets screwed by way of continual costs. The impact fee is a one-time fee. The tax is yearly.
  #161  
Old 10-03-2019, 08:50 AM
FenneyFanatic FenneyFanatic is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 240
Thanks: 27
Thanked 276 Times in 83 Posts
Default

  #162  
Old 10-03-2019, 08:56 AM
manaboutown manaboutown is offline
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NJ, NM, SC, PA, DC, MD, VA, NY, CA, ID and finally FL.
Posts: 7,415
Thanks: 12,957
Thanked 4,624 Times in 1,765 Posts
Default

IMHO due to the extensive size of the new development and the necessary upgrading of roads and more in existing developed areas an enormous amount of 'up front' money is needed - and needed NOW! I suppose bonds could be issued to raise money but they could not be tax free municipal bonds and would need to pay a higher rate of interest to be successfully marketed to the public as taxable bonds. I don't believe waiting on house by house impact fee payments however much they might be is a viable option to obtain the millions of up front dollars needed as some infrastructure will need to be in place prior to the first house being built. So, perhaps some genius with the developer proposed the huge countywide tax increase to fund the required infrastructure and the councilors bought it.
__________________
"No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth." Plato

“To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.” Thomas Paine

Last edited by manaboutown; 10-03-2019 at 09:11 AM.
  #163  
Old 10-03-2019, 09:18 AM
tophcfa's Avatar
tophcfa tophcfa is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
Posts: 6,099
Thanks: 2,873
Thanked 9,083 Times in 2,746 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dewilson58 View Post
Realistically Impact Fees don't impact the Developer.


IF the Impact Fee tripled, the Developer would just increase the price of the new houses by $2k. This would not slow sales. Every house in Southern Oaks would have sold if the price was $2k higher.


The Developer will make their 30% margin with a $1,000 Impact Fee or a $3,000 Impact Fee. It has nothing to do with Developer greed...............they will make their margins and they will continue to sell their new homes.


A friend is moving from an area by 466a to Southern Oaks. They have signed on the line. Construction will not start until February. What a great back-log. $2,000 additional fee would not have impacted the Developer.


Look for greed, controlling the commissioner, fraud some where else.




I am trying to follow your logic, if what you are saying is true then why wouldn't the developer gladly pay the impact fee and simply pass it on to the new homes sale price while maintaining their profit margin? I highly doubt pi$$ing off the majority of existing residents with a huge tax increase is something the developers would do if it had no impact on profits?

I keep asking myself, would this have happened if Gary Morse was still alive and running operations?
  #164  
Old 10-03-2019, 09:23 AM
Advogado Advogado is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,032
Thanks: 62
Thanked 685 Times in 229 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tophcfa View Post
I am trying to follow your logic, if what you are saying is true then why wouldn't the developer gladly pay the impact fee and simply pass it on to the new homes sale price while maintaining their profit margin? I highly doubt pi$$ing off the majority of existing residents with a huge tax increase is something the developers would do if it had no impact on profits?

I keep asking myself, would this have happened if Gary Morse was still alive and running operations?
You can't follow the logic because there is no logic to follow. Your analysis is absolutely correct.

Last edited by Advogado; 10-03-2019 at 09:33 AM.
  #165  
Old 10-03-2019, 09:53 AM
dewilson58's Avatar
dewilson58 dewilson58 is offline
Sage
Join Date: May 2013
Location: South of 466a, if you don't like me.......I live in Orlando.
Posts: 11,592
Thanks: 851
Thanked 9,777 Times in 3,645 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tophcfa View Post
I am trying to follow your logic, if what you are saying is true then why wouldn't the developer gladly pay the impact fee and simply pass it on to the new homes sale price while maintaining their profit margin? I highly doubt pi$$ing off the majority of existing residents with a huge tax increase is something the developers would do if it had no impact on profits?

I keep asking myself, would this have happened if Gary Morse was still alive and running operations?



You are too far into the conspiracy camp.....thinking the Developer controls commissioners and tax increases.


The Impact Fee is/was set, why would a business go to the county and ask for an increase?? If the county doesn't do it, TV houses are cheaper.


As I said, the developer will maintain their 30% margin.


__________________
Identifying as Mr. Helpful
Closed Thread

Tags
county, developer, impact, sumter, fee


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 PM.