Comcast vs Direct Vs Dish Comcast vs Direct Vs Dish - Talk of The Villages Florida

Comcast vs Direct Vs Dish

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-08-2008, 10:20 AM
Franz and Pat Franz and Pat is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Comcast vs Direct Vs Dish

New to the villages. Any advice on these dealers -- which is best, service etc. Thanks
  #2  
Old 11-08-2008, 10:44 AM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,170
Thanks: 5,009
Thanked 5,785 Times in 2,005 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Franz and Pat..HI! Franz is my brother in laws' name, don't run into too many of them.

We heard and are following the advice of others to get Direct TV. We recently switched to Direct TV in our Northern home and brought the boxes with us, so that when we have it installed here we can use it. ONE bill.

I don't know how that works, I am still baffled by the microwave.
  #3  
Old 11-08-2008, 11:32 AM
starflyte1 starflyte1 is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Villas de la Mesa
Posts: 1,869
Thanks: 374
Thanked 378 Times in 124 Posts
Default

Can you get internet thru Dirctv?
  #4  
Old 11-08-2008, 12:53 PM
aln's Avatar
aln aln is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 956
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

DirecTV is my choice mostly because I want the NFL Ticket.
BUT I also had it up north and always did like their service and quality.
If sports isn't a need, you can probably match Dishnetwork and DirecTV up pretty close.

Yes you can get interent through HughesNET which I believe is associated with DirecTV (NOT SURE) ......but it is very expensive.

Take the DSL option with Embarq if you choose not to go with Comcast.
  #5  
Old 11-08-2008, 09:38 PM
BarryB's Avatar
BarryB BarryB is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 144
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Are there certain restrictions where to place the dish on house?
I was on the phone with embarq yesterday. They said my address is so new they are not set up to provide DSL yet. For now I will gowith comcast
__________________
Bronx NY
North Bergen NJ
Village Of ST Charles
  #6  
Old 11-09-2008, 09:44 PM
aln's Avatar
aln aln is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 956
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Restrictions - yes.
Pretty simple tho'
Fill out the architectual review form - submit - get approved - install.
  #7  
Old 11-09-2008, 09:58 PM
The Great Fumar's Avatar
The Great Fumar The Great Fumar is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chatham
Posts: 2,017
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Gracie,,

when you get here with your boxes from up north , you call directtv and tell them you have changed your location ., when you give them your zip code they switch your service to the satellite serving this area.......or so i've been told....
Sounds kind of slick though......

Fumar
__________________
My memory's not as sharp as it used to be, Also
my memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
  #8  
Old 11-10-2008, 07:11 AM
EdV's Avatar
EdV EdV is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Village of Stonecrest
Posts: 1,122
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 provides limitations on restrictions that an association can impose. Here’s a link to the fact sheet on that law: http://www.fcc.gov/mb/facts/otard.html

Although regulations that require a person to obtain a permit or approval prior to installation are generally prohibited, regulations that serve a legitimate safety or historic preservation purpose may be permissible. So to avoid any problems, I think it would be prudent for an owner to do the following:

1. Have your antenna installer select the least obtrusive location for it that provides an acceptable quality signal.
2. Submit the plan on the basis of it being a simple notification process of your intent.
3. If the association rejects it, the burden of proof is on them to provide an acceptable alternative.
  #9  
Old 11-10-2008, 07:17 AM
graciegirl's Avatar
graciegirl graciegirl is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 40,170
Thanks: 5,009
Thanked 5,785 Times in 2,005 Posts
Send a message via AIM to graciegirl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdVinMass View Post
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 provides limitations on restrictions that an association can impose. Here’s a link to the fact sheet on that law: http://www.fcc.gov/mb/facts/otard.html

Although regulations that require a person to obtain a permit or approval prior to installation are generally prohibited, regulations that serve a legitimate safety or historic preservation purpose may be permissible. So to avoid any problems, I think it would be prudent for an owner to do the following:

1. Have your antenna installer select the least obtrusive location for it that provides an acceptable quality signal.
2. Submit the plan on the basis of it being a simple notification process of your intent.
3. If the association rejects it, the burden of proof is on them to provide an acceptable alternative.
You can call it what you want, Submit first. Dish is Not allowed on roof I am told. I am sure the direct tv installers are familiar with the restrictions after having moved a few. I know the good landscapers know what is allowed and not allowed.
  #10  
Old 11-10-2008, 02:07 PM
EdV's Avatar
EdV EdV is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Village of Stonecrest
Posts: 1,122
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

GG. Not sure who “They” are, but they are wrong. It’s not what they say you can do but what the US Government says you can do with the placement of satellite dishes and over the air antennas for broadcast reception. And the reason the law was enacted is that the frequencies that these specific dishes and antennas receive are part of the National Alert System (formerly the Emergency Broadcast System) and would be used in a state of National emergency. That’s also the reason why the law doesn’t apply to other types of antennas such as HAM or CB antennas.

There’s no question that your roof is last place that The Villages wants you to put an antenna, and I certainly agree with that. But if your roof is the only place on your property that the antenna can receive an acceptable quality signal, then the government’s response to any action to prohibit you would be as Glinda, the Good Witch of the North said when threatened by the Wicked Witch of the West: "Oh, rubbish. You have no power here.”
  #11  
Old 12-29-2008, 01:12 PM
EdV's Avatar
EdV EdV is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Village of Stonecrest
Posts: 1,122
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Just ran across the Architectural Review Committee's Guideline for Use of Satellite Dishes in The Villages:

http://www.vccdd.org/vccdd/SatDishGuidelines.asp

It recognizes the FCC rule but rightly requires you to place the dish in the least obtrusive location that can receive an acceptable signal.

Last edited by EdV; 12-29-2008 at 01:17 PM.
  #12  
Old 12-29-2008, 01:30 PM
diskman's Avatar
diskman diskman is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Las Vegas,NV
Posts: 517
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default I used to work for a direct tv distributor

Quote:
Originally Posted by aln View Post
DirecTV is my choice mostly because I want the NFL Ticket.
BUT I also had it up north and always did like their service and quality.
If sports isn't a need, you can probably match Dishnetwork and DirecTV up pretty close.

Yes you can get interent through HughesNET which I believe is associated with DirecTV (NOT SURE) ......but it is very expensive.

Take the DSL option with Embarq if you choose not to go with Comcast.
YOU DON'T want hughes net for internet service VERY EXPENSIVE and unnecessary.
__________________
Larry is from Brooklyn,NY, / Oakdale NY, / Forest Hills,NY / Oceanside NY,/ Long Beach NY,
/South Freeport NY,/Garden Grove CA,/
Beverly is from Brooklyn NY, W. Hempstead, NY, Baldwin,NY and starting with Long Beach NY the rest with me.
Wanabee future TVer
  #13  
Old 12-31-2008, 02:53 PM
Freeda's Avatar
Freeda Freeda is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Village of Hillsboro, The Villages
Posts: 757
Thanks: 20
Thanked 117 Times in 67 Posts
Default Direct TV/ Comcast

We use DirectTV and use Comcast for our internet; very happy with both. Of course, as with any satellite TV, weather can sometimes disrupt reception, but we have noticed very little problem with that; and has always been brief when it occurs.

Comcast offered us a low price of about $26 per month for high speed internet as a new customer for the first year when we moved here a little more than a year ago; then, when they were recently going to increase it to the 'regular' price of about $55-60 per month, I negotiated, and they cut it down to $36 per month for the ongoing bill. Freeda Clark
__________________
Freeda Louthan
Lexington KY 1951-1972, Louisville KY 1972-2007
The Villages FL since 2007 - Home for good, at last

Measure your wealth not by the things that you have, but by the things you have for which you wouldn't take money.
The world needs dreamers; the world needs 'do'-ers. But most of all, the world needs dreamers who are do-ers.
  #14  
Old 12-31-2008, 03:23 PM
carolynpage carolynpage is offline
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Franz and Pat View Post
New to the villages. Any advice on these dealers -- which is best, service etc. Thanks
Actually I prefer Direct TV to either of the ones you listed. (I have had all 3).
__________________
Nanacee
  #15  
Old 01-01-2009, 11:54 AM
NJblue NJblue is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 4
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Default

I called Comcast about a month ago and they have a little price anomaly that may be of interest to those wanting to go with a satellite service for their main TVs but have basic (i.e., local stations) for auxiliary TVs. That is, the price that they charge for Internet-only service is almost exactly what they charge for a package comprising Internet plus basic cable. (Actually, their price for the latter is actually a little cheaper than for Internet only.)

What this means is that rather than pay the per-TV charge that satellite providers charge for the monthly receiver rental, you can put basic cable on all TVs that you may only use occasionally (i.e., guest rooms). This frees you up from having to have another ugly box by these TVs and also provides backup TV service in case the satellite service is knocked out by a storm. While a cheaper solution (assuming you want cable Internet access), the trade off is that the auxiliary TVs will not have all of the channels that the satellite service provides.
Closed Thread


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 PM.