China to halt Boeing deliveries China to halt Boeing deliveries - Page 4 - Talk of The Villages Florida

China to halt Boeing deliveries

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #46  
Old 04-16-2025, 06:37 AM
Danube Danube is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 110
Thanks: 48
Thanked 44 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Normal View Post
All the while, Boeing just landed a huge contract for the new F47 fighter jet and the multi billion dollar C 17 sustainability contract. They will need more workers to keep up.
Overpriced, late delivery junk, like the weak F-35. Having a US monopoly on large passenger jets, Boeing is more of a money-laundering operation.

Should of never let McDonnell Douglas and Boeing merge.
  #47  
Old 04-16-2025, 06:37 AM
MollyJo MollyJo is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 151
Thanks: 1,486
Thanked 107 Times in 57 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Cramdon View Post
It’s fascinating how often people blame China for the loss of U.S. jobs, rather than the companies that chose to move operations there in pursuit of higher profits.
Exactly. Corporate greed.
Be careful what you wish for.
  #48  
Old 04-16-2025, 06:38 AM
Havingfun Havingfun is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu from NYC View Post
This trade war was a long time coming. We do need to balance our foreign trade stop allowing other countries to take advantage of us
Trade war was started by us or our elected leader
China is not going to back down to being bullied as the US consumes only 15% of what they export. The other fact is that China is producing its own aircraft. Look up Comac
If they can build a hospital in six days when covid hit they can certainly build a plane as they are doing.
We are naive to think that we can somehow recreate the past and that manufacturing inexpensive goods here will return. Our gracious leader has made free trade the boogeyman and that we need to be saved. China is not going to line up to kiss his ass any time soon I’m afraid
  #49  
Old 04-16-2025, 06:39 AM
Danube Danube is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 110
Thanks: 48
Thanked 44 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoastDawg View Post
Indeed. Jingoism v Realism. Like (still) thinking that China will just roll over rather than retaliate.
They will end up building their own planes and buying Russian aircraft. They will be better off in the long run, just like the US-imposed sanctions since 2022 ended up helping the Russian economy.

Last edited by Danube; 04-16-2025 at 06:54 AM.
  #50  
Old 04-16-2025, 06:41 AM
Danube Danube is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 110
Thanks: 48
Thanked 44 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Cramdon View Post
It’s fascinating how often people blame China for the loss of U.S. jobs, rather than the companies that chose to move operations there in pursuit of higher profits.
Exactly. And more and more US media and most people in the federal gov't are calling for war.
  #51  
Old 04-16-2025, 06:42 AM
Arctic Fox's Avatar
Arctic Fox Arctic Fox is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,431
Thanks: 27
Thanked 1,318 Times in 527 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspinmo View Post
Didn’t England pull out of euro? I wonder why?
The UK stuck with sterling rather than joining the Eurozone.

Remaining decoupled from disparate European economies was a smart move.
  #52  
Old 04-16-2025, 06:43 AM
skarra skarra is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 140
Thanks: 54
Thanked 409 Times in 98 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhoward View Post
I think China stopping delivery of Boeing aircraft will be very painful to us as Aircraft are one of the most important products that we export. It’s bound to hurt our trade deficit even if Boeing does have a backlog,

I also think the tariffs on Chinese products will prove painful because I don’t see companies rushing to manufacture in the us based on tariffs that could easily be repealed in the future. Regardless prices on goods will increase.

It seems like we are losing on both ends.

Agreed. This tariff war is plain foolish.

Manufacturing and the IP along with it went out years ago. We all benefited from it and so let’s move on and do what we do best, services.
  #53  
Old 04-16-2025, 06:45 AM
Arctic Fox's Avatar
Arctic Fox Arctic Fox is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,431
Thanks: 27
Thanked 1,318 Times in 527 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Normal View Post
All the while, Boeing just landed a huge contract for the new F47 fighter jet and the multi billion dollar C 17 sustainability contract. They will need more workers to keep up.
I thought the tariffs were designed to narrow the trade gap with other countries? I don't see how getting the USA taxpayer to pay for more warplanes compensates in any way for China pulling out of buying civil planes from a US company.
  #54  
Old 04-16-2025, 07:01 AM
LonnyP LonnyP is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 137
Thanks: 208
Thanked 50 Times in 40 Posts
Default

We were told there would be winning!
  #55  
Old 04-16-2025, 07:06 AM
Ski Bum Ski Bum is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 178
Thanks: 8
Thanked 152 Times in 83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bopat View Post
This backfires on China. Boeing’s backlog is years long, so undelivered planes could find other buyers, albeit with delays in remarketing. China’s airlines, meanwhile, might struggle with older fleets or turn to Airbus, which is also stretched thin. If parts are embargoed, China risks grounding its Boeing-heavy fleets, which could cripple domestic operations.
Yep. So many knee jerk reactions here that only think A to B. Gotta get to C, D, and E!
__________________
It's all downhill from here!
  #56  
Old 04-16-2025, 07:06 AM
Cliff Fr Cliff Fr is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 406
Thanks: 256
Thanked 263 Times in 151 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
Buyer's remorse; looking for someone to blame rather than taking responsibility for our own actions.

"Muscling in" could explain why US manufacturing exports decreased but it doesn't explain an increase in imports. US manufacturing moved to increase profits. American customers encouraged this by voting with their wallets. Everyone was a winner until "we" decided we didn't like the current situation and needed someone to blame.
login?

You do know that during covid China threatened to cutoff our supply of antibiotics right? Now they have built an island in the ocean with a military base in order to claim the waters as their own. They are not exactly our benevolent friend. Do you really think we should continue to rely on them for critical minerals, medicines and parts?
  #57  
Old 04-16-2025, 07:07 AM
Federspiel Federspiel is offline
Member
Join Date: May 2023
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 24 Times in 17 Posts
Default

I sense this is really a political discourse.
  #58  
Old 04-16-2025, 07:10 AM
Ski Bum Ski Bum is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 178
Thanks: 8
Thanked 152 Times in 83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arctic Fox View Post
I thought the tariffs were designed to narrow the trade gap with other countries? I don't see how getting the USA taxpayer to pay for more warplanes compensates in any way for China pulling out of buying civil planes from a US company.
Narrowing the trade gap is a ruse. There are 4 goals:
1. Reciprocal tariffs, at 10%
2. Removal of non-tariff trade barriers
3. Restore a level of US manufacturing for critical goods for national security
4. Decouple from China

Once that is understood, the news makes a lot more sense.
__________________
It's all downhill from here!
  #59  
Old 04-16-2025, 07:22 AM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 7,100
Thanks: 2,206
Thanked 7,535 Times in 2,926 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ski Bum View Post
Narrowing the trade gap is a ruse. There are 4 goals:
1. Reciprocal tariffs, at 10%
2. Removal of non-tariff trade barriers
3. Restore a level of US manufacturing for critical goods for national security
4. Decouple from China

Once that is understood, the news makes a lot more sense.
Sounds like so much rationalization.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough
  #60  
Old 04-16-2025, 07:30 AM
airstreamingypsy airstreamingypsy is offline
Gold member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,344
Thanks: 6,060
Thanked 1,286 Times in 646 Posts
Default

There's a reason why Walmart is the biggest retailer in the world, the cheap prices. Many people live paycheck to paycheck, they are not able to spend for made in America goods. Imagine how much a t-shirt will cost if the people sewing it are making 20.00 an hour.

All this chaos for billionaires, while the middle class gets poorer.
__________________
_____________________
"It's a magical world, Hobbes, Ol' Buddy... let's go exploring!"
Closed Thread

Tags
china, laughing, airbus, production, domestic


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 AM.