[Two Bills]

Originally Posted by spexdr

But it will make 4 stops along the way.

The non stop takes 3 hrs.
Fast, but not high speed.

[mikemalloy]

Originally Posted by Two Bills

The non stop takes 3 hrs.
Fast, but not high speed.

I believe I read that from MCO to Cocoa it will do about 120mph. The track from there apparently isn't built for that type of speed.
Not mentioned is the convenience for those who cruise. It also provides an alternative for those having difficulty getting into s. fla. by air. Recently Ft. Lauderdale was closed because of flooding and some trying to fly in from overseas couldn't make their cruise since all flites to alternatives like W. Palm and Miami were booked. I'm sure that there will be some transportation from the Miami and Lauderdale stations to the ports. The interesting would be getting from TV to MCO for the train. I understand the train will bill like the airlines for baggage.

[Ecuadog]

This link might help provide some facts.

Brightline - Orlando... click here

[retiredguy123]

Originally Posted by Skip

Please get your facts straight. This is entirely funded by Brightline, not Amtrak, not the government. They are also building one between Las Vegas and Los Angeles. That'll be a money maker for sure.

Skip

Not true. It took me 2 minutes to find this article:

The federal government Monday awarded $25 million to South Florida’s Brightline railway to improve safety along some of the most dangerous tracks in the country. The total price tag for the initiative will be $45 million after $10 million from the privately run rail line and another $10 million from the Florida Department of Transportation.

Also, Brightline and the NDOT in Nevada have applied for a $4 billion grant from the Federal Government for the western railway. I am sure there will be additional Federal funding coming later, and, if the company fails, the Government will bail them out. Amtrak should be a lesson to the Government. It has been a total funding disaster.

[Rainger99]

Originally Posted by mikemalloy

I understand the train will bill like the airlines for baggage.

According to their website, "Up to two (2) carry-on items per passenger are allowed on board our trains, subject to space availability. Each item must not exceed 40 lbs. (18 kg) in weight and 28" x 22" x 14" (71 x 56 x 35 cm) in exterior dimensions."

You can also check luggage for $10.

[BostonRich]

Originally Posted by retiredguy123

Sounds like another money pit for taxpayers.

It's a private operation.

[retiredguy123]

Originally Posted by BostonRich

It's a private operation.

See Post No. 34. A private operation using your tax money.

[askcarl]

I commuted for 20 years from West Palm to Miami. Cars stripped of tires, gas, Catalytic Converters, radios, LED Headlights ($400-1000 each).

Yup, can't wait to Zip down to Miami.

[sandyblanquera@gmail.com]

Originally Posted by Pairadocs

The information you received "could" be, actually is, deceiving. You have to live in Lauderdale by the Sea, or Pompano, or Deerfield and commute by car daily to Miami, to know what it is really like. Not "arguing" but, counting on that time frame commuting on 95 into Miami, don't count on it. The proof will be in the "pudding" of course, I'll bet the train will be extremely popular.

I guess it depends on what you mean by success. If you mean lowering pollution, then yes fewer cars going the same way. If you mean using less fossil fuels to transport the same number of people, then likely yes, depending how full the trains are. If you mean making other cities easily accessible to people leaving from MCO, then yes. This is especially true if they don’t want or need to rent a car. If you mean the time it takes you personally to travel, then it depends. Would you like to use the time on the train to watch your favorite movie, read a book or relax instead of driving? Then yes.