Washing Machines:  Front load vs. top load Washing Machines: Front load vs. top load - Talk of The Villages Florida

Washing Machines: Front load vs. top load

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-04-2008, 07:46 PM
gfmucci's Avatar
gfmucci gfmucci is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hadley
Posts: 719
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Washing Machines: Front load vs. top load

We are in the market for a washer and dryer for our new Amarillo.* There are three categories of washer available:* Top load, separate washer and dryer.* Top load washer, with integrated dryer on the top.* And front load washer, which could either be side by side with a separate dryer, or stacked.* There is also an "all-in-one" washer/dryer, but the dry cycles take several hours and are not being considered.

The front load washers cost roughly 20% to 100% more than a top load model, but they are supposedly quieter, more energy and water efficient, and get the cloths cleaner.* I understand that recent new energy standards result in top load washers being less effective in their cleaning ability.

What are your recent experiences and recommendations in your search for washers?
__________________
Brockton, MA 1946-49 * Fort Lauderdale 1950-66 * Northern Virginia (Army) 1967-69 * North Lauderdale 1970-72 * Coconut Creek 1973-87 * St. Louis 1988-89 # Northern Virginia (again) 1990-2000 * Destin, FL 2001-08 * The Villages - Amelia/Hadley
  #2  
Old 03-04-2008, 07:53 PM
SteveFromNY's Avatar
SteveFromNY SteveFromNY is offline
Eternal Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,197
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Washing Machines: Front load vs. top load

Recently purchased the stackable front load pair from Sears. They work great, although take a slightly smaller load than the top load, but take up less floor space in our condo.

I'd recommend them.
  #3  
Old 03-04-2008, 08:01 PM
redwitch's Avatar
redwitch redwitch is offline
Sage
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,094
Thanks: 3
Thanked 80 Times in 37 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to redwitch
Default Re: Washing Machines: Front load vs. top load

For the average wash, I'd say the top loader works just fine. However, if you're like me and wash your comforters and other large items at home, then the front loader is really the best machine. Ditto if you're washing a lot of clothes or washing clothes for little ones.

Let's face it, how often do we old codgers really get clothes all that dirty? We need to wash out the sweat, an occasional food stain, our gardening clothes and that's about it in the way of dirt. So, "cleaner" washing really isn't that much of a factor. Neither is the energy savings considering we're not washing clothes daily -- our families have shrunk enough that that isn't necessary.

So, get the front load if you're washing a lot of large, heavy items frequently. A compact one if you have only a little to wash on a weekly or bi-weekly basis or room is truly a factor. Otherwise, I'd say stick with the middle-of-the-road top loaders.

Oddly, got this advice back in California from one of the large appliance dealers (non-Sears) in my area. He also said go gas for the dryer if at all possible. I got the front load washer and gas dryer and never regretted my decision. Here, I have top loader, electric. They work well on my clothing, but I'm taking my comforters and rugs to a laundromat to get them clean.
__________________
Army/embassy brat - traveled too much to mention
Moved here from SF Bay Area (East Bay)

"There are only two ways to live your life: One is as though nothing is a miracle; the other is as though everything is a miracle." Albert Einstein
  #4  
Old 03-04-2008, 10:37 PM
bestmickey's Avatar
bestmickey bestmickey is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 753
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Washing Machines: Front load vs. top load

While I don't have a front-load washer, my sister and another friend do. Both of them RAVE about how gentle the machine is on their clothes AND about the water savings. They indicate that most items don't need to be ironed because the tumbling of the clothes is so gentle. The machine (they both purchased at Sears, but I think it's a GE model) is extremely quiet as well. I've used the machine at my sister's, and I agree with their recommendations. When I need to replace my current machine, I'm definitely going for a front-load model.

I don't know anyone with a front-load dryer, so can't comment there.
__________________
Yesterday is history.
Tomorrow is a mystery.
Today is a gift.
  #5  
Old 03-04-2008, 10:46 PM
ejp52's Avatar
ejp52 ejp52 is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Duval
Posts: 724
Thanks: 212
Thanked 31 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: Washing Machines: Front load vs. top load

We bought Maytag Neptune washer and dryer,front loaders and love them.
They use lot less water and can handle larger loads of laundry.
As a guy who does the laundry I'm impressed. :bigthumbsup:
  #6  
Old 03-04-2008, 11:14 PM
handieman's Avatar
handieman handieman is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Villages
Posts: 893
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Washing Machines: Front load vs. top load

Mrs. Handie and I just recently purchased a front loading set. We have to say the front load washer is a win win situation with soap savings and water savings. We would do it again hands down.
Handie :joke:
__________________
Upstate NY and The Villages-If your not living on the edge, your taking up way too much room."
  #7  
Old 03-04-2008, 11:19 PM
aln's Avatar
aln aln is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 956
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Washing Machines: Front load vs. top load

We gotta 'ditto' the handieman. Bought the Whirlpool Duet's from Sears Appliances up north on 441 and my wife says I can bury them with her. They'll go where she goes
:bigthumbsup:
__________________
Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, cigar in one hand, scotch in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"
  #8  
Old 03-05-2008, 12:05 AM
784caroline 784caroline is offline
Soaring Eagle member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,436
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Default Front Load Washer and dryer --- Pedestals

WHat BUGS me about the new front load wsher and dryers is the small stoop or pedestals they try and sell you for an additional $250 each above teh cost of an expensive appliance. If you dont get these "stoops" or pedestals you will break your back bending over trying to get your clothes out of the washer and dryer. As someone earlier mentioned, hOw much clothes can you reallly wash...3-4 loads a week! Top washer dryer for me!!
  #9  
Old 03-05-2008, 04:24 AM
Sidney Lanier Sidney Lanier is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Washing Machines: Front load vs. top load

Calling a front-loading washing machine 'energy and water efficient' is an understatement. Our son has two of these as part of his business; each uses a tiny percentage of the amount of water (that has to be heated, don't forget, if you run your wash warm or hot) of a top loader, and it runs on barely more than a capful of detergent. However, yes, they are more expensive; he spent close to $5,000 for the two stacked front-loader washers and dryers, and this was several years ago. Do your research and get what will work best for you.
  #10  
Old 03-05-2008, 04:44 PM
RCT RCT is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 299
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to RCT
Default Re: Washing Machines: Front load vs. top load

As a person who was told by my Mother that I got clothes dirty just trying them on in a store..... hasn't changed in adulthood. Just the fact of saving water is reason enough for me to go with frontload, as long as it's affordable, which I understand might be a stretch for some. ANYTHING we as Floridians can do to save water, exponentially, would be huge.
__________________
No previous place matters anymore TV's Spanish Springs Villas 6.30.08
  #11  
Old 03-05-2008, 09:15 PM
Mikitv's Avatar
Mikitv Mikitv is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Test
Posts: 1,046
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Washing Machines: Front load vs. top load


:bigthumbsup:

We purchased the Kenmore Front load washer and dryer about three years ago. I also purchased the pedestals because of back problems. They do use less water and I am very pleased with them. We have king and queen size bedding, plus three people in the house and no problem with size of loads. In 41 yrs I've had Kenmore and Maytag with the Maytag being the one that had the most problems. This is my third set of Kenmore and am very pleased with them.
__________________
TV AT LAST,Jonesboro AR, NashvilleTn, Northville MI, Okemos MI, Howell, MI, Berkley MI, Royal Oak, MI

Nothing so needs reforming as other peoples habits. "Mark Twain"
  #12  
Old 03-05-2008, 10:37 PM
Muncle's Avatar
Muncle Muncle is offline
Eternal Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Until noon, probably in bed.
Posts: 1,674
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Washing Machines: Front load vs. top load

Like Caroline, the concept of the pedestals really ticks me off and would keep me from buying the otherwise superior machine. (Personality flaw -- tick me off and I won't do business with you, even though it would be to my benefit to do so. It's come back to bite me in the rear several times in my life. But that's okay, I sleep better.) Why would a company market a machine with a built-in design flaw, i.e., the thing's too low to use conveniently? Maytag, Whirlpool, whoever could easily raise the height of the doors at a fraction of the cost of the pedestals. Obviously some number crunching genius determined that people would willingly buy the more expensive machines, then think nothing of adding another $200+ per machine to make them usable. That's why they get the big bucks.
__________________
Kansas City, MO; Alamo & Albuquerque NM; Quad Cities; St Louis; DC ~ NOVA; Nuernberg; Heidelberg; DC ~ NOVA; Liberty Park ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Life is like a sewer. What you get out of it depends upon what you put into it.
~~~~~~
And it's Munc"L"e, not Munc"I"e
  #13  
Old 03-05-2008, 11:53 PM
Russ_Boston's Avatar
Russ_Boston Russ_Boston is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Buttonwood
Posts: 4,841
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Washing Machines: Front load vs. top load

Do what my friend did - make your own. Maybe not as pretty as the nice metal ones but you can design them to be whatever height fits the person and with more versatile storage options. There are lots of woodworkers in TV who might like the project. It even looks like a nice built in storage unit on the entire length of the laundry rooms might be a good choice. Make them match the other cabinetry in the room.
  #14  
Old 03-06-2008, 01:14 AM
punkpup's Avatar
punkpup punkpup is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Village of Marsh Bend, The Villages, FL; Oakland, CA; Boston, MA.
Posts: 423
Thanks: 25
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Washing Machines: Front load vs. top load

I bought my first Front Load Washing Machine back in '89! One of the best investments I ever made. Actually to call a front loader a washing machine is a misnomer; the technical name for a front loader is extractor. Think about it.... in a top loader you're swishing your clothes around in dirty water then it spins and the grungy water gets pumped out and the rinse water gets pumped in and your closed get swished around in slightly less grungy water, etc. Every time the tub in a top loader fills up there's still some small amount of residual water which gets added to the tub. Ever notice a film on the surface of a full tub in a top loader?

It all boils down to gravity, spin speed and centrifugal force. Front loaders can use less water because what we might consider a wash cycle is actually a soak cycle allowing the surfactants in the detergent to release the dirt in the laundry then a spin cycle extracts the the dirty water, so with each successive fill/spin cycle more grunge is removed leaving your laundry much cleaner and with a lot less moisture after the final cycle. Sooooooo, less water = less money, less time to complete the entire cycle = more savings and then shorter drying time because more water has been extracted translates into further savings. NOTE: gas dryers although more expensive dry clothes faster.

One way to save money purchasing appliances is to do the price matching thing, purchase a floor model which might have a blemish or two on it or look for an appliance retailer who has a "Scratch and Dent" section. The extractor I bought was a floor model with not a blemish in sight and I price matched the dryer and saved several hundred $$$. In addition when the brand new dryer got delivered it had a dent on the side of it so the store manager gave me an additional $30 off.

BUYER BEWARE: Some models sold at places like Lowes and Home Depot as well as warehouse stores like BJ's, Sam's and Costco can be next to impossible to "Price Match" because appliances sold by them are made specifically for them and consequently have a model number unique only to that particular retailer as opposed to an "Appliance Store" which sells models found in the manufacturers literature and on their web sites.

I agree about the pedestals being ridiculously priced; I think they should be included in the price of the extractor and dryer but personally I really like the custom cabinet idea much better. Whaddya wanna bet a retailer might be convinced to either significantly reduce the price or maybe even throw them in if they felt the pedestal issue to be a "deal breaker".
__________________
Newtown, PA; Poughkeepsie, NY; Danville, CA; Oakland, CA; Palm Desert, CA; San Francisco, CA; Key West, FL; Boston, MA; Future Villages Resident
  #15  
Old 03-06-2008, 01:16 AM
gfmucci's Avatar
gfmucci gfmucci is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hadley
Posts: 719
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Washing Machines: Front load vs. top load

I heard from a couple of appliance sales people that the front loaders tend to vibrate and move around when mounted on top of the metal pedestals. The idea of making your own out of wood or some other heavy, dense material makes sense, perhaps adding dense rubber on the top and bottom.
__________________
Brockton, MA 1946-49 * Fort Lauderdale 1950-66 * Northern Virginia (Army) 1967-69 * North Lauderdale 1970-72 * Coconut Creek 1973-87 * St. Louis 1988-89 # Northern Virginia (again) 1990-2000 * Destin, FL 2001-08 * The Villages - Amelia/Hadley
Closed Thread


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 AM.