Where are you in this matter. Surely, you can't keep blaming the media and liberals. We are Americans, do you get this now! Is Trump's ego that important that he can't admit that Russia ' s interest in our election favored Trump and hurt Clinton. ADMIT IT!

If he admits it he will be admitting Putin helped getting him elected. Republicans can say "it had no effect" but we know that is a total lie. We know it was a factor, how big a factor is up for debate but it was a factor. No honest person would say otherwise.

Originally Posted by Guest

If he admits it he will be admitting Putin helped getting him elected. Republicans can say "it had no effect" but we know that is a total lie. We know it was a factor, how big a factor is up for debate but it was a factor. No honest person would say otherwise.

Yes but honesty does not seem to be much of a virtue to many of the Republicans heading into the Oval Office. There are some good guys in the mix though. I wonder how long Mattis will last among these people?

Originally Posted by Guest

Where are you in this matter. Surely, you can't keep blaming the media and liberals. We are Americans, do you get this now! Is Trump's ego that important that he can't admit that Russia ' s interest in our election favored Trump and hurt Clinton. ADMIT IT!

He doesn't dare admit it, given that his ego can't handle anything that is close to being the truth.

That and the fact that we will eventually find out how much money Putin has loaned him, through third party intermediaries...will fully explain his being such a sycophant for Putin and Russia.

Where did Russia's interference hurt Hillary? Give me some fact, not just conjecture.

Originally Posted by Guest

Where did Russia's interference hurt Hillary? Give me some fact, not just conjecture.

Well, seems to me the ENTIRE Trump campaign was a DAILY mock fest of the emails made public.

NOT speaking of those from the Clinton server, but those from Podesta.

The campaign as a road show of...mock the press, point fingers at them, isolate a few he didn't like, then cheer for the wall, break into a chant about Crooked Hillary, whikecTrump did a stand up about the latest drip of hacked emails. Actually, except for a few very general comments made to be crowd pleasers, not much about issues.

Originally Posted by Guest

Where are you in this matter. Surely, you can't keep blaming the media and liberals. We are Americans, do you get this now! Is Trump's ego that important that he can't admit that Russia ' s interest in our election favored Trump and hurt Clinton. ADMIT IT!

I do get part of this - "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein

Originally Posted by Guest

Well, seems to me the ENTIRE Trump campaign was a DAILY mock fest of the emails made public.

NOT speaking of those from the Clinton server, but those from Podesta.

The campaign as a road show of...mock the press, point fingers at them, isolate a few he didn't like, then cheer for the wall, break into a chant about Crooked Hillary, whikecTrump did a stand up about the latest drip of hacked emails. Actually, except for a few very general comments made to be crowd pleasers, not much about issues.

So, you are powerless to prove the point. I thought so. No one has proven that Russia did anything that we haven't done or our libtard media has not done. As a matter of fact, no votes were hacked. And no one admits that anything that Russia did caused them to change their vote.

So, Russia is just an excuse for losers.

The first step to libtard recovery is to admit they are losers.

All together now, say it. Say, I am a libtard and I am a loser. Remember, you want to heal from your malady.

If it was reported accurately and if I read it correctly one aspect of this often spoken topic has to do with the DNC. when intelligence officers approached them to inspect the alleged computer(s) hacked the DNC refused to turn them over.

This action begs the question why? One possibility is that there was more on that computer that the DNC did not want revealed. Another possibility is that Hillary and company were still shell shocked over the hacked e-mails had been made public and hence gun shy.

I am not defending Trump nor Putin. Putin is obviously positioning himself to make to remake Russia relevant again.

As to Trump ties to Putin is it a surprise that in this global world of trade people in every industry and nation know one another have conducted business with one another, etc

However, the most obvious but most ignored issue regarding the alleged Russian hack is the relevation of the exposed e-mails to the contempt shown by Hillary and company for Christians, especially Catholics , for people in general and the audacity they had to work in unison to stop Bernie Sanders.

Think about it, a 70+ ex-hippy that had accomplished little was a real threat to Hillary Clinton. And why the anti-Catholic anti-christian position? Because as to their social justice homosexual agenda they fear Christian morality and beliefs

Indeed Putin's actions should continue to be under close scrutiny, and Trump's position toward Russia made clear.

However let's not lose sight of the fact that people voted because they rejected the progressive agenda and believed the nation was headed in the wrong direction. Our history tells us that these changes in course direction have happened in the past and the past is prologue to the future.

Personal Best Regards:

Libtards are led so easily by those better than them, if saying the liberal media and socialist politicians are better.

Libtards want desperately to feel vindicated for backing the historically worst candidate in history. That's a fact.
Libtards NEED Trump to admit that he had help by Russia winning when he did NOT.
Libtards NEED to believe that Hillary was not filthy dirty.
Libtards are in denial, because they cannot believe that they lost and they lost because Trump used the same dirty tactics that the left has used for several elections to win.

And now the NEED/NEED Trump to say something that will vindicate their disastrous defeat.

Originally Posted by Guest

So, you are powerless to prove the point. I thought so. No one has proven that Russia did anything that we haven't done or our libtard media has not done. As a matter of fact, no votes were hacked. And no one admits that anything that Russia did caused them to change their vote.

So, Russia is just an excuse for losers.

The first step to libtard recovery is to admit they are losers.

All together now, say it. Say, I am a libtard and I am a loser. Remember, you want to heal from your malady.

Ya, I remember when I was in third grade.

Originally Posted by Guest

If it was reported accurately and if I read it correctly one aspect of this often spoken topic has to do with the DNC. when intelligence officers approached them to inspect the alleged computer(s) hacked the DNC refused to turn them over.

This action begs the question why? One possibility is that there was more on that computer that the DNC did not want revealed. Another possibility is that Hillary and company were still shell shocked over the hacked e-mails had been made public and hence gun shy.

I am not defending Trump nor Putin. Putin is obviously positioning himself to make to remake Russia relevant again.

As to Trump ties to Putin is it a surprise that in this global world of trade people in every industry and nation know one another have conducted business with one another, etc

However, the most obvious but most ignored issue regarding the alleged Russian hack is the relevation of the exposed e-mails to the contempt shown by Hillary and company for Christians, especially Catholics , for people in general and the audacity they had to work in unison to stop Bernie Sanders.

Think about it, a 70+ ex-hippy that had accomplished little was a real threat to Hillary Clinton. And why the anti-Catholic anti-christian position? Because as to their social justice homosexual agenda they fear Christian morality and beliefs

Indeed Putin's actions should continue to be under close scrutiny, and Trump's position toward Russia made clear.

However let's not lose sight of the fact that people voted because they rejected the progressive agenda and believed the nation was headed in the wrong direction. Our history tells us that these changes in course direction have happened in the past and the past is prologue to the future.

Personal Best Regards:

I love the part where you say "I'm not defending Putin". No, you are blaming the victim. Democrats were the victim of a crime and republicans were the beneficiary of the crime. Now republicans are trying to convince us all that it didn't help them at all. Move on folks there is nothing to see. We don't need to investigate this. We only need to make sure it doesn't happen again. Shameful.

Originally Posted by Guest

I love the part where you say "I'm not defending Putin". No, you are blaming the victim. Democrats were the victim of a crime and republicans were the beneficiary of the crime. Now republicans are trying to convince us all that it didn't help them at all. Move on folks there is nothing to see. We don't need to investigate this. We only need to make sure it doesn't happen again. Shameful.

You've been asked many times to provide one shred of evidence that Russia's hacking had any effect on the election. You can't provide any proof, other than stupid innuendos and suppositions. If you didn't just watch your re-runs of Springer's best of the trailer trash episodes, you might have seen Republicans demanding action and investigation on the Russian hacking.

Your problem is that you listen to Obie and other libtard losers squeal that they were robbed.

Hillary lost because of Hillary and nothing Obama could do or say convinced anyone that Hillary was clean or that his policies that she was running on were successful.

Russia did not effect the election. Did Russia hack us? Of course, and they have been hacking for over 40 years. That's old news and that's why we are saying, nothing to see here folks. Move on to the inaugural. It's inevitable, so don't let it eat you up. It's not healthy.

BS baiters coming on strong!

Originally Posted by Guest

You've been asked many times to provide one shred of evidence that Russia's hacking had any effect on the election. You can't provide any proof, other than stupid innuendos and suppositions. If you didn't just watch your re-runs of Springer's best of the trailer trash episodes, you might have seen Republicans demanding action and investigation on the Russian hacking.

Your problem is that you listen to Obie and other libtard losers squeal that they were robbed.

Hillary lost because of Hillary and nothing Obama could do or say convinced anyone that Hillary was clean or that his policies that she was running on were successful.

Russia did not effect the election. Did Russia hack us? Of course, and they have been hacking for over 40 years. That's old news and that's why we are saying, nothing to see here folks. Move on to the inaugural. It's inevitable, so don't let it eat you up. It's not healthy.

Prove it didn't. Why would Trump and Putin go to the effort of trying to put out all the fake news, hack the emails if they didn't think it would work? Any moron would know it had some effect. The degree of it's effectiveness is what's debatable. Again, can you prove it had NO effect?