http://mobile.nytimes.com/2008/05/24...24clinton.html

Good point.

"spokesman for the Obama, which has refrained from engaging Mrs. Clinton in recent days, said her statement “was unfortunate and has no place in this campaign.”

Privately, aides to Mr. Obama were furious about the remark.

And she made those crazy remarks before her concussion days...

Sorry but that is a huge stretch. Compare what Donald Trump said. And I am 99% sure he knew exactly what he was saying and its intent. The 2nd Amendment zealots call for an insurrection using these weapons if they do not like the government in power like the Founding Fathers.

Crazy, ain't it?

Originally Posted by Guest

Good point.

"spokesman for the Obama, which has refrained from engaging Mrs. Clinton in recent days, said her statement “was unfortunate and has no place in this campaign.”

Privately, aides to Mr. Obama were furious about the remark.

The Obama's always hated the Clinton's and still do. Barry is just doing what he needs to do to try to make a helpless "legacy."

Clinton says it was a surprise when Obama offered her secretary of state. That is one of her many blatant lies. It was a calculated exchange for her and womanizing bills support of Obama.

Originally Posted by Guest

Sorry but that is a huge stretch. Compare what Donald Trump said. And I am 99% sure he knew exactly what he was saying and its intent. The 2nd Amendment zealots call for an insurrection using these weapons if they do not like the government in power like the Founding Fathers.

How could it be a stretch, the liberal new York times said it created an "uproar" and that was democratic on democratic. Logic and truth disappears in politics, especially when your party controls the press.

Breaking??? Article was written in May 2008. Her comment was that she wasn't quitting the race yet and a truly stupid remark that things changed when RFK was assassinated. Huge difference between that and calling for the assassination of opponents or the suggestion that pro-gun proponents should assassinate Clinton should she win the election.

Red

Originally Posted by Guest

Breaking??? Article was written in May 2008. Her comment was that she wasn't quitting the race yet and a truly stupid remark that things changed when RFK was assassinated. Huge difference between that and calling for the assassination of opponents or the suggestion that pro-gun proponents should assassinate Clinton should she win the election.

Red

I don't even think you are capable of understanding the actual point of the thread.

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Very true, the ops additional point is the ridiculousness of the media, and unfortunately their influence over stupid voters.

Not a guest

Originally Posted by Guest

I don't even think you are capable of understanding the actual point of the thread.

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Your not capable of seeing the difference in the remarks, but as a trumpster it figures.

Originally Posted by Guest

Very true, the ops additional point is the ridiculousness of the media, and unfortunately their influence over stupid voters.

Not a guest

Oh, and how can you tell the OP's point when all there was is a link.

Donald Trump's comment-- and I do not believe it a joke-- was aimed directly at a group of 2nd Amendment zealots who believe that if they do not like the government in power, they can revolt against it using the arms protected by the 2nd Amendment.

The media are right on but should not be labeling this a joke. It is anything but a joke.

Clinton's remark was a direct reference to an assassination, which Obama called horrific. Trumps remark a rally call for supporters of 2nd ammendment to vote. Period.

Originally Posted by Guest

Clinton's remark was a direct reference to an assassination, which Obama called horrific. Trumps remark a rally call for supporters of 2nd ammendment to vote. Period.

Exactly! DA liberals can't find anything to gig The Donald on other than his figures of speech. Clinton on the other hand is a criminal felon, pathological liar and a thief.

Originally Posted by Guest

Exactly! DA liberals can't find anything to gig The Donald on other than his figures of speech. Clinton on the other hand is a criminal felon, pathological liar and a thief.

His "figures of speech?"