Clinton's HIV Secret REVEALED - This Could END Of Hillary's Campaign!

I knew he appeared pretty sickly, and joked that he might have aides, but could it be true?

Originally Posted by Guest

Clinton's HIV Secret REVEALED - This Could END Of Hillary's Campaign!

I knew he appeared pretty sickly, and joked that he might have aides, but could it be true?

I wasn't thinking aids but I was thinking something was up. I respect the man and like Carter when his presidency was over he kept working through his foundation to help others.

I expect that opinion won't fly to far here but I don't care. Have fun with it.

Originally Posted by Guest

I wasn't thinking aids but I was thinking something was up. I respect the man and like Carter when his presidency was over he kept working through his foundation to help others.

I expect that opinion won't fly to far here but I don't care. Have fun with it.

Yes, HIS "foundation" ha, ha, ha. He has a lot of idiots fooled with it. But, it doesn't take much to fool liberal guppies.

His foundation spends 8% helping people and the Clintons help themselves to the rest of the donations. Money laundering at its finest. Problem is that they are going to have to pay off someone at the IRS to get them off their backs.

I guess, if rumors of his illness are true, he is finally getting screwed for all the females he has screwed over. At least Hillary won't have to worry about it. I doubt there is ANY chance of her catching his sickness.

With no hesitation I can say I despise everything that Bill and Hillary Clinton stand for politically, for their lack of moral integrity, honesty, for their outright criminal activity.

But never never would I condone a personal attack such as the one suggested in this thread against either of the Clinton's .

This is the type of conduct that is unhealthy for this country and for our souls.

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

With no hesitation I can say I despise everything that Bill and Hillary Clinton stand for politically, for their lack of moral integrity, honesty, for their outright criminal activity.

But never never would I condone a personal attack such as the one suggested in this thread against either of the Clinton's .

This is the type of conduct that is unhealthy for this country and for our souls.

Personal Best Regards:

Is this an attack, or just media speculation? The OP linked an article to support this issue, and Bill Clinton has made politics his issue, so if he is ill, then that is of public interest. It seems that Gingrich's martial affairs are fair game, as well as Trump's being married more than once. Hillary gets off scott free on her perpetration of multiple felonies, so a bit of speculation on Bill's possible illness seems hardly out of political bounds.

Originally Posted by Guest

Yes, HIS "foundation" ha, ha, ha. He has a lot of idiots fooled with it. But, it doesn't take much to fool liberal guppies.

His foundation spends 8% helping people and the Clintons help themselves to the rest of the donations. Money laundering at its finest. Problem is that they are going to have to pay off someone at the IRS to get them off their backs.

I guess, if rumors of his illness are true, he is finally getting screwed for all the females he has screwed over. At least Hillary won't have to worry about it. I doubt there is ANY chance of her catching his sickness.

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

A charity's Program % is the percentage of its cash budget it spends on Programs relative to Overhead (Fundraising and Management & General Expenses)

Clinton foundation is 88%

Show me where you got your information.

Originally Posted by Guest

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

A charity's Program % is the percentage of its cash budget it spends on Programs relative to Overhead (Fundraising and Management & General Expenses)

Clinton foundation is 88%

Show me where you got your information.

8% goes to charity and the rest is toward administration, to include plane transportation for the family, meals, "business" attire, etc. Lots and lots of administrative fees, right? It will all come out, when the IRS investigation into their alleged tax fraud is finished. Not that anyone is going to believe that an IRS that is intent on punishing conservatives is going to do anything to THE CLINTONs. Not any more than our corrupt administration keeping her from being charged with the multiple felonies she perpetrated.

Originally Posted by Guest

8% goes to charity and the rest is toward administration, to include plane transportation for the family, meals, "business" attire, etc. Lots and lots of administrative fees, right? It will all come out, when the IRS investigation into their alleged tax fraud is finished. Not that anyone is going to believe that an IRS that is intent on punishing conservatives is going to do anything to THE CLINTONs. Not any more than our corrupt administration keeping her from being charged with the multiple felonies she perpetrated.

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch
The Clinton Foundation was given an A rating. Find out why.

I'll ask again. Show everyone where you got your information. Did you make it up?

"While Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State, the governments of Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, Australia, Norway, Algeria, and the Dominican Republic all lavished millions of dollars on the Clinton Foundation. While acting coy when questioned about most of these, the Clinton Foundation has admitted it should have sought approval from the State Department before accepting $500,000 from the government of Algeria. "

"Foreign donors aren’t the only shady sources of funds for the organization. Denise Rich—ex-wife of billionaire fugitive Marc Rich charged with wire fraud, tax fraud, tax evasion, and other felonies—gave the foundation $450,000. Bill Clinton gave a presidential pardon to Marc Rich on his last day in office."

"The New York Times also reports when she was at the State Department, Hillary okayed a financial transaction that handed control over 20 percent of America’s strategically important uranium resources to Russia after investors gave money to Bill and large donations to the Clinton Foundation. This matters because uranium is needed to make nuclear weapons and America only has an estimated 20 percent of the uranium it needs."

"And the Clinton Foundation has some explaining to do after one of its former employees received a sentence of life imprisonment in Egypt after being convicted of sedition. In 2012 Gehad el-Haddad, “divided his time between volunteering for the Muslim Brotherhood and heading the Cairo office of the Clinton Climate Initiative, but later that year began to work full time for the Muslim Brotherhood.” (Egypt Independent, July 31, 2012"

The Clinton Foundation: A cauldron of conflicts and cronyism – Capital Research Center

Originally Posted by Guest

"While Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State, the governments of Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, Australia, Norway, Algeria, and the Dominican Republic all lavished millions of dollars on the Clinton Foundation. While acting coy when questioned about most of these, the Clinton Foundation has admitted it should have sought approval from the State Department before accepting $500,000 from the government of Algeria. "

"Foreign donors aren’t the only shady sources of funds for the organization. Denise Rich—ex-wife of billionaire fugitive Marc Rich charged with wire fraud, tax fraud, tax evasion, and other felonies—gave the foundation $450,000. Bill Clinton gave a presidential pardon to Marc Rich on his last day in office."

"The New York Times also reports when she was at the State Department, Hillary okayed a financial transaction that handed control over 20 percent of America’s strategically important uranium resources to Russia after investors gave money to Bill and large donations to the Clinton Foundation. This matters because uranium is needed to make nuclear weapons and America only has an estimated 20 percent of the uranium it needs."

"And the Clinton Foundation has some explaining to do after one of its former employees received a sentence of life imprisonment in Egypt after being convicted of sedition. In 2012 Gehad el-Haddad, “divided his time between volunteering for the Muslim Brotherhood and heading the Cairo office of the Clinton Climate Initiative, but later that year began to work full time for the Muslim Brotherhood.” (Egypt Independent, July 31, 2012"

The Clinton Foundation: A cauldron of conflicts and cronyism – Capital Research Center

Since everyone is a guest I'm not sure if this was a response to my question. I doubt it. This is a new subject.

8% goes to charity and the rest is toward administration


is what someone claims. Where did that number come from?

It was probably wrong, because it's more like 6% in 2013.

"The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid."

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’ | New York Post

Originally Posted by Guest

It was probably wrong, because it's more like 6% in 2013.

"The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid."

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’ | New York Post

The easiest way to research national charities is with the three major charity watchdogs: Charity Navigator, CharityWatch, and the BBB Wise Giving Alliance. They rate charities based on how they spend their money, protect donor privacy, govern themselves, and more. Some have tools to sort and search for organizations and reviews. They use somewhat different criteria and don't always agree, so check out a charity with all three groups. [consumer reports]

Charity Navigator I can't Clinton's Rating on Charity Navigator
Charity Navigator - Your Guide To Intelligent Giving | Home

Charity Watch
A rating Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch


BBB Wise Giving Alliance Clinton Foundation / aka Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation Standards Not Met
Charity Report - Clinton Foundation / aka Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation - give.org

That's what I found so far. The New York Post is a terrible source of information. They sensationalize titles just to sell papers or advertisement. The Clinton's name will be cleared again and people will cry "foul". At least I post all the information.

Originally Posted by Guest

The easiest way to research national charities is with the three major charity watchdogs: Charity Navigator, CharityWatch, and the BBB Wise Giving Alliance. They rate charities based on how they spend their money, protect donor privacy, govern themselves, and more. Some have tools to sort and search for organizations and reviews. They use somewhat different criteria and don't always agree, so check out a charity with all three groups. [consumer reports]

Charity Navigator I can't Clinton's Rating on Charity Navigator
Charity Navigator - Your Guide To Intelligent Giving | Home

Charity Watch
A rating Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch


BBB Wise Giving Alliance Clinton Foundation / aka Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation Standards Not Met
Charity Report - Clinton Foundation / aka Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation - give.org

That's what I found so far. The New York Post is a terrible source of information. They sensationalize titles just to sell papers or advertisement. The Clinton's name will be cleared again and people will cry "foul". At least I post all the information.

more information
The Charity was renamed. I wonder if that's because Bill is ill.

Originally Posted by Guest

It was probably wrong, because it's more like 6% in 2013.

"The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid."

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’ | New York Post

Where Does Clinton Foundation Money Go?

We looked at the consolidated financial statements (see page 4) and calculated that in 2013, 88.3 percent of spending was designated as going toward program services — $196.6 million out of $222.6 million in reported expenses.

Originally Posted by Guest

Since everyone is a guest I'm not sure if this was a response to my question. I doubt it. This is a new subject.

8% goes to charity and the rest is toward administration


is what someone claims. Where did that number come from?

Would it make difference in your opinion and support for clintons ? I doubt it.