Originally Posted by Guest

Every minute that goes by I become more convinced the reason for her unwarranted survival is the wall of defense being put around the possibility of an Obama involvement.

Today 22 emails that were between Clinton and Obama were removed from the list. The come under the protection of the president's something or other. They may not be released until "...years after he leaves the WH...".

There are an awful lot of complicit people in Washington keeping their heads down and their mouths shut.

The only reason Clinton is not prosecuted to the fullest.

The wagons are circled for a reason.

All that remains is for the American people to wake up...especially those who blindly support the tainted Clinton candidacy.

You mean Executive Privilege. Every President has had that not just the Clintons, Obama, etc.

There may be other factors involved.

Originally Posted by Guest

You mean Executive Privilege. Every President has had that not just the Clintons, Obama, etc.

There may be other factors involved.

When Presidents Invoke Executive Privilege | FRONTLINE

Do some Googling.

Originally Posted by Guest

You mean Executive Privilege. Every President has had that not just the Clintons, Obama, etc.

There may be other factors involved.

It has become increasingly obvious the ONLY rational assumption is either the knowledge or direct or indirect involvement in Clinton's violation of federal laws. Hence persecution and prosecution is being shielded, hidden, allowed for SELF preservation.

Political lawyers playing the game against political lawyers playing the blame, shame, shell game.

Obama will direct his Attorney General (he appointed) to shield him from Hillary's grievous felonious actions. The only way to do that, will be for the AG to ignore the case presented to her by the non-partisan FBI. Hillary is guilty of multiple felony violations, but will not be charged because Obama will protect himself by protecting her. She will run amok with her loud claim that she did nothing wrong because she was not charged. She will blame anything resulting from this as an attack from the right. A favorite tact of hers. She is scum and anyone with the least intelligence would realize that and not support her. But, since her husband is also scum and got away with many/many crimes, she will also.

Originally Posted by Guest

Obama will direct his Attorney General (he appointed) to shield him from Hillary's grievous felonious actions. The only way to do that, will be for the AG to ignore the case presented to her by the non-partisan FBI. Hillary is guilty of multiple felony violations, but will not be charged because Obama will protect himself by protecting her. She will run amok with her loud claim that she did nothing wrong because she was not charged. She will blame anything resulting from this as an attack from the right. A favorite tact of hers. She is scum and anyone with the least intelligence would realize that and not support her. But, since her husband is also scum and got away with many/many crimes, she will also.

Could not have said it better myself. It just makes one wonder how far does party loyalty go to ignore, accept, support, promote such an incompetent felon.

Originally Posted by Guest

That is the choice of liberals. They ignore anything that is right. It's almost like they believe that morals and ethics do not exist. Yes, by all means ignore the source, regardless of the truth.

Liberals admit the fact that they walk about blindly, allowing the supreme government to direct their zombie bodies.

The source has no truth.

This is the same source that claimed Etchy was going to win 325 electoral votes. This is the source that verified Iraq had WMD's.

See a pattern here?

The only people more ignorant and out of touch with reality than Fox News are those that watch it and rely on it as a source of information

Originally Posted by Guest

The source has no truth.

This is the same source that claimed Etchy was going to win 325 electoral votes. This is the source that verified Iraq had WMD's.

See a pattern here?

The only people more ignorant and out of touch with reality than Fox News are those that watch it and rely on it as a source of information

They did have WMD's. I saw proof of them. So, I guess the joke is on you and anyone else that has been told otherwise. You do know that the gov keeps secrets from the people, don't you? Well, someone has to provide the information/intelligence for them to keep secret. But, this is not about WMD's. Suffice it to say, you don't know everything that goes on. Just because a liberal media outlet of some sort tells you something, doesn't mean diddly.

Originally Posted by Guest

They did have WMD's. I saw proof of them. So, I guess the joke is on you and anyone else that has been told otherwise. You do know that the gov keeps secrets from the people, don't you? Well, someone has to provide the information/intelligence for them to keep secret. But, this is not about WMD's. Suffice it to say, you don't know everything that goes on. Just because a liberal media outlet of some sort tells you something, doesn't mean diddly.

Were you wearing your tin foil hat angled toward Mecca when you saw these WMDs?

Did the little green men probe you aboard their flying saucer, too?

We are glad that your meds are letting you type now but the words are still like the chimpanzees writing the works of Shakespeare.

Originally Posted by Guest

The source has no truth.

This is the same source that claimed Etchy was going to win 325 electoral votes. This is the source that verified Iraq had WMD's.

See a pattern here?

The only people more ignorant and out of touch with reality than Fox News are those that watch it and rely on it as a source of information

And just how does it come to pass that you are (or claim you are) so well versed on FOX?

Never mind it is a rhetorical question (doesn't require an answer as it makes a point!).

Impossible to have a view that does not incorporate the need to call folks names. The only reason must be self gratification.

Pretty sad actually!

Originally Posted by Guest

Were you wearing your tin foil hat angled toward Mecca when you saw these WMDs?

Did the little green men probe you aboard their flying saucer, too?

We are glad that your meds are letting you type now but the words are still like the chimpanzees writing the works of Shakespeare.

No! He was standing next to Trump, who saw thousands and thousands of Muslims in New Jersey cheering as the twin towers were coming down. It is amazing what you can see when you look for it.

Originally Posted by Guest

Obama will direct his Attorney General (he appointed) to shield him from Hillary's grievous felonious actions. The only way to do that, will be for the AG to ignore the case presented to her by the non-partisan FBI. Hillary is guilty of multiple felony violations, but will not be charged because Obama will protect himself by protecting her. She will run amok with her loud claim that she did nothing wrong because she was not charged. She will blame anything resulting from this as an attack from the right. A favorite tact of hers. She is scum and anyone with the least intelligence would realize that and not support her. But, since her husband is also scum and got away with many/many crimes, she will also.

Minus the scum comments that's Washington. Somebody's protecting somebody, political favors being called in, appointees doing what they need to do, etc. Where have you been? Wake up.

Originally Posted by Guest

Were you wearing your tin foil hat angled toward Mecca when you saw these WMDs?

Did the little green men probe you aboard their flying saucer, too?

We are glad that your meds are letting you type now but the words are still like the chimpanzees writing the works of Shakespeare.

Sure and those thousands of citizens killed by Sadaam in mass graves were just tickled to death. No big deal if you believe or not. Those in the know don't mind laughing at your naivete. You wouldn't know, being as you were back here being protected and all.

Originally Posted by Guest

They did have WMD's. I saw proof of them. So, I guess the joke is on you and anyone else that has been told otherwise. You do know that the gov keeps secrets from the people, don't you? Well, someone has to provide the information/intelligence for them to keep secret. But, this is not about WMD's. Suffice it to say, you don't know everything that goes on. Just because a liberal media outlet of some sort tells you something, doesn't mean diddly.

Don't take this the wrong way. IF you were in Desert Storm and have these issues that clearly show unresolved anger and rage - you might have PTSD or some other form of problem - onset of Alzheimer or dementia. These can be helped by VA care or referrals.

I put this on here without being facetious or making fun. If you think it might apply to you, talk to a professional healthcare provider.

Originally Posted by Guest

Sure and those thousands of citizens killed by Sadaam in mass graves were just tickled to death. No big deal if you believe or not. Those in the know don't mind laughing at your naivete. You wouldn't know, being as you were back here being protected and all.

Be careful when you throw stones at someone, because they can come right back at you. Who supplied the chemical weapons used in killing those five thousand Iraqi citizens? Reagan. Oops. Don't worry Oliver North wasn't involved. He only concentrated on Central America. So, Oliver can continue with his Fox series of war stories, which is quite good. How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons

How many citizens were and are being killed in that area, since Saddam was killed? Maliki did more harm than Saddam. Under Saddam, there was no ISIS. Saddam was a ******* that should have been replaced or killed. Maybe it was necessary to go to war to do it. However we did, end of story.

Originally Posted by Guest

Don't take this the wrong way. IF you were in Desert Storm and have these issues that clearly show unresolved anger and rage - you might have PTSD or some other form of problem - onset of Alzheimer or dementia. These can be helped by VA care or referrals.

I put this on here without being facetious or making fun. If you think it might apply to you, talk to a professional healthcare provider.

There is only one way to take it when someone makes such an allegation not knowing one iota about the person being addressed.

Poor choice of such a response.