Originally Posted by Guest

The Republicans are grasping at straws to try and make it seem Mrs. Clinton' being a woman and mentioning it is a bad thing.

She is an inspiration to women who want our sex to break the glass ceiling.

A strong woman leader is a lot better than the likes of Huckabee, Cruz, Santorum, or the dropped out Walker. We do not need nor want a theocracy in America. If those who want a theocracy, book your next flight to Iran. See how far being an outspoken woman will get you over there.

I feel sorry for you. Too bad you consider being a Christian to be a bad thing. We have seen the results of a pseudo Muslim running things in D.C. and it isn't pretty. If you think Hilary represents women then you are very pathetic and haven't listened to her. If you think that it is ok for her to blatantly disregard federal law and put out country's national security at risk, then you are pretty shallow. You should be thinking of the country first, not the celebrity status of the candidate.

Personally, I would trust a person that has courage to profess his faith than one that tries to hide it. You mention a "strong woman leader" but have little regard to what's better for our country. That's a shame.

Originally Posted by Guest

The Republicans are grasping at straws to try and make it seem Mrs. Clinton' being a woman and mentioning it is a bad thing.

She is an inspiration to women who want our sex to break the glass ceiling.

A strong woman leader is a lot better than the likes of Huckabee, Cruz, Santorum, or the dropped out Walker. We do not need nor want a theocracy in America. If those who want a theocracy, book your next flight to Iran. See how far being an outspoken woman will get you over there.

I don't see you mentioning Carly Fiorina as a possible woman president. You would rather a crook, criminal, liar than a good leader?

Originally Posted by Guest

I don't see you mentioning Carly Fiorina as a possible woman president. You would rather a crook, criminal, liar than a good leader?

I definitely think that Mrs. Fiorina made great advances for herself and other womhen, rising to CEO of a major corporation. Her business acumen was not good and HP terminated her.

Originally Posted by Guest

I definitely think that Mrs. Fiorina made great advances for herself and other womhen, rising to CEO of a major corporation. Her business acumen was not good and HP terminated her.

You are ignorant of the facts, aren't you? I'm not going to go into educating you on the aspects of her(Fiorina) employment history, but I will say that if you think that Clinton is a better choice, you are definitely lacking in knowledge and facts.

Why don't you admit that you really don't care about whether or not she is a woman. You are just miserable and want to chose the worst possible choice for America. What did America do to you that you feel so disgruntled? It's obvious, because you can't even defend Clinton. You actually embrace her illegal behavior. I feel sorry for you.

I wonder when the IRS will charge the Clintons on tax evasion/fraud.

Originally Posted by Guest

You are ignorant of the facts, aren't you? I'm not going to go into educating you on the aspects of her(Fiorina) employment history, but I will say that if you think that Clinton is a better choice, you are definitely lacking in knowledge and facts.

Why don't you admit that you really don't care about whether or not she is a woman. You are just miserable and want to chose the worst possible choice for America. What did America do to you that you feel so disgruntled? It's obvious, because you can't even defend Clinton. You actually embrace her illegal behavior. I feel sorry for you.

Originally Posted by Guest

You are ignorant of the facts, aren't you? I'm not going to go into educating you on the aspects of her(Fiorina) employment history, but I will say that if you think that Clinton is a better choice, you are definitely lacking in knowledge and facts.

Why don't you admit that you really don't care about whether or not she is a woman. You are just miserable and want to chose the worst possible choice for America. What did America do to you that you feel so disgruntled? It's obvious, because you can't even defend Clinton. You actually embrace her illegal behavior. I feel sorry for you.

Everyone should feel sorry for you. For someone that professes to be knowledgeable of the facts, why don't you ever present the facts? If you want to talk about miserable, you are the gold standard of miserable.

Why should anybody try to defend Clinton here, where people just don't listen?

Originally Posted by Guest

Hillary's campaign will not be affected one iota by her comment.

Nobody said that it would or not.

The discussion was about HER! You know Clinton's unsavory character. And that she is not a good representative of the female gender....IN SO MANY WAYS!!

And for those who think Fiorina is OK but she was fired from HP....that is the party talking point coming through. Those who feel that way need to do a little home work before just parroting those who choose an unethical, habitual, untrustworthy liar instead.

Originally Posted by Guest

Everyone should feel sorry for you. For someone that professes to be knowledgeable of the facts, why don't you ever present the facts? If you want to talk about miserable, you are the gold standard of miserable.

Why should anybody try to defend Clinton here, where people just don't listen?

Because you can't come up with a logical, reasonable defense for her. You won't defend her because you can't.

Try telling us when was the last time she made a good choice? When did she last make a good decision? Hint: use google and maybe Huffington might have an answer for you. Doubtful of it's validity, but at least you might have an answer other than Bush did it.

Originally Posted by Guest

The Republicans are grasping at straws to try and make it seem Mrs. Clinton' being a woman and mentioning it is a bad thing.

She is an inspiration to women who want our sex to break the glass ceiling.

A strong woman leader is a lot better than the likes of Huckabee, Cruz, Santorum, or the dropped out Walker. We do not need nor want a theocracy in America. If those who want a theocracy, book your next flight to Iran. See how far being an outspoken woman will get you over there.

....the only "glass ceiling" anywhere is the one you put up there. You don't even know what it means. You probably have to go ask your spouse what it means. I understand that Bruce Jenner is being nominated for "Woman of the Year." Does that make him the one that is going to "break the glass ceiling" for women, or men that wannabee women? He was an Olympic athlete so perhaps he will pole vault through that glass ceiling?

You folks with gender and race issues are pathetic. Typical liberals that insist on being slaves of gender and race. You are slaves of your own minds.

You liberals make such stellar choices to represent you. You wanted bragging rights for the first black president, and you gave us an inept failure. With all the choices you could have made, such as Colin Powell, you chose a socialist, racist, divisive nobody.
Now, you want to choose for your "first female president" the worst possible crooked, liar in America to represent your party. You obviously have issues with critical thinking and logic. Are you liberals really that ignorant, naive or purposely disgruntled with American freedom? Does thoughtful, logical, common sense decisions elude you?

Originally Posted by Guest

Everyone should feel sorry for you. For someone that professes to be knowledgeable of the facts, why don't you ever present the facts? If you want to talk about miserable, you are the gold standard of miserable.

Why should anybody try to defend Clinton here, where people just don't listen?

Because we know the truth, and have yet to hear anyone give a good reason for electing her, other than she can be the "first female president."

Originally Posted by Guest

Because we know the truth, and have yet to hear anyone give a good reason for electing her, other than she can be the "first female president."

Perhaps it is because Hillary is a far better example of a world leader and has workable plans than ANY of the Republican candidates.

It is so funny to see how the Right Wing is so scared of losing the election to Hillary they are talking up Bernie Sanders as the Democrat nominee. Yes, with Sanders as the nominee, Republicans would have a good chance of winning - but no chance of winning with Hillary as the Democrat nominee.

It is also going to be so hilarious to see Don Trump run as the third party nominee. Fox News and other Republican groups have been "dissing" Trump. He will wait until after South Carolina and announce the pledge is null and void and that is how a real business leader operates. The Republican party will split their votes.

Hillary WINS and Democrats are in the White House another 8 years!

It is very difficult to come up with any logic to suggest why a party would want a nominee that has had difficulty all of her public life with telling the truth, so many investigations into her and her husbands dealings, books written on her total lack of respect for anyone "beneath her level", and a total lack of character.

These are not simply general political kind of remarks. EVERY SINGLE word has been proven over the years yet the Democratic party does not seem to care.

The Clinton NATIONAL odyssey began with a lie by both of them on 60minutes prior to the first election he won. It is NOT a guess if he lied; when he was forced to testify under oath later, he admitted he lied.

Since most historians agree that that interview when he looked in the camera and lied is what put him over the top, it began with a lie.

What does that have to do with his wife? She is complicit and has been from day one, and this also can be proven.

I just cannot understand a party wanting her as a nominee frankly and certainly cannot understand anyone voting for her once she is jammed down the throat of the party. I mean a victory lap from a hearing where she lied knowingly and that validated past lies is beyond description.

Originally Posted by Guest

Perhaps it is because Hillary is a far better example of a world leader and has workable plans than ANY of the Republican candidates.

It is so funny to see how the Right Wing is so scared of losing the election to Hillary they are talking up Bernie Sanders as the Democrat nominee. Yes, with Sanders as the nominee, Republicans would have a good chance of winning - but no chance of winning with Hillary as the Democrat nominee.

It is also going to be so hilarious to see Don Trump run as the third party nominee. Fox News and other Republican groups have been "dissing" Trump. He will wait until after South Carolina and announce the pledge is null and void and that is how a real business leader operates. The Republican party will split their votes.

Hillary WINS and Democrats are in the White House another 8 years!

The view from a sand trap is a bit odd frankly.

The Republican party, in fact, might be in trouble IF IT WERE NOT for Ms Clinton. She is and will be the unifying part of the campaign.

Never post much with a mention of Fox or some little cutsey remark on names (never heard Donald Trump referred to as Don) always gives some away.