Trump pulls back on Hillary

 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-22-2016, 02:01 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Arrow Trump pulls back on Hillary

He pulled the plug on emails and foundation.

What do you folks think of that move.

Some are disappointed

Some say ..but you will see in short the this was brilliant strategic positioning.

By stepping away from personally pursuing Hillary, Trump de-politicizes it while showing an independent and fair FBI and AG

He has no say in whether the FBI and AG go after Hillary, will they still?



.
  #2  
Old 11-22-2016, 02:16 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
He pulled the plug on emails and foundation.

What do you folks think of that move.

Some are disappointed

Some say ..but you will see in short the this was brilliant strategic positioning.

By stepping away from personally pursuing Hillary, Trump de-politicizes it while showing an independent and fair FBI and AG

He has no say in whether the FBI and AG go after Hillary, will they still?



.

Trump realizes he has bigger fish to fry. He has wars to run, budgets to write, 3996 jobs to fill, a replacement for the ACA to write so 24 million don't lose their health care, 11 million people to deport, a wall to build, what am I forgetting?

It's interesting he made this decision on the very day that the Trump Foundation was found guilty.
  #3  
Old 11-22-2016, 02:16 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

From what I understand, he said that prosecution was not off the table.
  #4  
Old 11-22-2016, 03:21 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

He said it was not his priority. How they twisted it to say he had no intention of pursuing Hillary's prosecution is anyone's guess.
  #5  
Old 11-23-2016, 08:29 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

If there was something to pursue relative to charges against HRC, rest assured, he would. Since he's not you can draw your own conclusions. The "Lock Her Up" BS was just that!
  #6  
Old 11-23-2016, 08:50 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Hmmmmnnnn.....I thought it was up to the DOJ, AG and FBI.

However, I guess Obama proved that is not true!!!!
  #7  
Old 11-23-2016, 09:57 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

TRUMP BACKING OFF ON PROMISES. Hey, he is starting to "get" this political stuff. Why would anybody be surprised?
  #8  
Old 11-23-2016, 09:59 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Exclamation

Jan get your seat-belt on Jan 20th
  #9  
Old 11-23-2016, 10:18 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Jan get your seat-belt on Jan 20th

Will do, thanks Bob. Tell Kathy I said HI.
  #10  
Old 11-23-2016, 10:22 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
He said it was not his priority. How they twisted it to say he had no intention of pursuing Hillary's prosecution is anyone's guess.
The thing is that it's not the president's place to pursue prosecution. It's up the FBI to present a case to the attorney general who then decides whether or not to prosecute. Congress can also do investigation and recommend prosecution or not.

The president can, of course, direct or influence the AG which is what many people think might have happened in this case.

Once this administration takes place on Jan 22, if congress or the FBI does investigation and decides to turn it over to the justice department, this justice department might not be quite as lenient on Hillary.

Or who knows. Maybe Comey was right and there's nothing there.
  #11  
Old 11-23-2016, 10:28 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

If nothing else perjury is a slam dunk
  #12  
Old 11-23-2016, 10:29 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
The thing is that it's not the president's place to pursue prosecution. It's up the FBI to present a case to the attorney general who then decides whether or not to prosecute. Congress can also do investigation and recommend prosecution or not.

The president can, of course, direct or influence the AG which is what many people think might have happened in this case.

Once this administration takes place on Jan 22, if congress or the FBI does investigation and decides to turn it over to the justice department, this justice department might not be quite as lenient on Hillary.

Or who knows. Maybe Comey was right and there's nothing there.

Comey and the FBI's investigation lasted over a year. The republican lead congress held nine hearings on Benghazi. What would be an ample number of hearings or time frame?
  #13  
Old 11-23-2016, 11:34 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Comey and the FBI's investigation lasted over a year. The republican lead congress held nine hearings on Benghazi. What would be an ample number of hearings or time frame?
Ample? Whatever it takes to get a indictment and conviction. We already know she is guilty. By her own admission, she broke the law. Saying you are sorry does not cut it. There's plenty of evidence. Enough for a first year laws student to get a conviction. Shoot, a cop could get a conviction with all the evidence available.
  #14  
Old 11-23-2016, 12:25 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Takes longer when folks plead the 5th, don't submit requested docs deleted emails or use bleachbit and lie.
 

Tags
trump, hillary, stepping, strategic, positioning


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30 AM.