A timeline of the molestation allegations against Josh Duggar - The Washington Post


Josh Duggar, the eldest child on the reality show about the Duggars, is alleged to have molested five young girls when he was 14 years old.

This is the same family who rails against transgender people, saying they will prey on young children when they use a public restroom, all the while knowing that they are covering for a pedophile. The height of hypocrisy.

This episode goes back 12 years, but recently came to light and caused TLC to cancel the TV show starring the 19 Duggars. Josh Duggar also resigned his position with the Family Research Center.

Read the article for a timeline of this complicated story. Hopefully, John Duggar has a good job because he has a lot of mouths to feed.

Why is this in the political forum? When we had our own little sex controversy on our square it was not relegated to the guest quarters.

He is not alleged to have molested them, he admitted it. And at least 4 of them were his own sisters who he fondled while they were sleeping. And the parents were aware and did not go through the legal system instead went to their church which did not do a child abuse report. Josh was sent to a Christian training center run by a man whose program was pushed by the family, and that man has resigned his position last year amid allegations of failure to report child abuse. Only through a staff person on Oprah was this finally investigated. The cop friend of the family that did nothing with his information is now in jail for several decades for child pornography. This would be a nothing story but for the fact that this family has chosen to portray themselves on TV as the perfect religious righteous example for us all. They have asked us to share their lives and marvel at their success. So their asking for privacy and special consideration for their hurt fee fees is part of the risk you take when you choose to be tabloid fodder for your own profit with a giant skeleton in your closet.

Originally Posted by Guest

Why is this in the political forum? When we had our own little sex controversy on our square it was not relegated to the guest quarters.

Why does ANYONE think this is political ???

Originally Posted by Guest

Why does ANYONE think this is political ???

Because the Duggars are very tight with a number of the GOP candidates, especially Mike Huckabee who immediately came out in their defense. If the moderator thinks it is not political, he/she will move it.

The Duggars are also the epitome of extreme right wing values.

Originally Posted by Guest

Because the Duggars are very tight with a number of the GOP candidates, especially Mike Huckabee who immediately came out in their defense. If the moderator thinks it is not political, he/she will move it.

The Duggars are also the epitome of extreme right wing values.

So the logic now is that any discussion of any virtual reality television show should be investigated to see who they are "tight' with and if anyone is in politics, it comes here ?

WHY was not the David Letterman thread on here ? Stan Druckenmiller is another thread (he managed George Soros funds) ?

TO MODERATOR....please provide background checks on all reality show participants to determine with whom they are "tight" in order to get them on this political forum. And of course you will move the Letterman thread and the Druckenmiller thread here also.

Keep in mind, MODERATOR...ANY AND ALL threads that refer to the developer of The Villages by defintion of this poster needs to be in this political area.

Bull post that does not belong in political as it is a distraction from the political bill posts.

Originally Posted by Guest

Bull post that does not belong in political as it is a distraction from the political bill posts.

She simply wanted an opportunity to slam at Mike Huckabee, which is pretty much standard operating.

To some political discussion is demeaning others....a number of posts on various thread about the book on free speech which calls out the new political left and their lack of any understanding, knowledge or care on issues. Just slam the person.

It goes on with both parties but one has perfected it and this thread is typical of this poster and her cronies. Find a way to go after somebody.

Originally Posted by Guest

Because the Duggars are very tight with a number of the GOP candidates, especially Mike Huckabee who immediately came out in their defense. If the moderator thinks it is not political, he/she will move it.

The Duggars are also the epitome of extreme right wing values.

Asinine liberal smear tactics ... strikes again

Originally Posted by Guest

She simply wanted an opportunity to slam at Mike Huckabee, which is pretty much standard operating.

To some political discussion is demeaning others....a number of posts on various thread about the book on free speech which calls out the new political left and their lack of any understanding, knowledge or care on issues. Just slam the person.

It goes on with both parties but one has perfected it and this thread is typical of this poster and her cronies. Find a way to go after somebody.

Yes, just read The Silencing to see how this works. It's pretty easy to spot, but increasingly widespread. The book is accurate and well written by a flaming liberal ... but a free speech advocate in the classical tradition.

Here's the Amazon link:

[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Silencing-Left-Killing-Free-Speech/dp/1621573702/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1432437175&sr=1-1&keywords=the+silencing]The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech: Kirsten Powers: 9781621573708: Amazon.com: Books[/ame]

Originally Posted by Guest

Asinine liberal smear tactics ... strikes again

What part of

Because the Duggars are very tight with a number of the GOP candidates, especially Mike Huckabee who immediately came out in their defense. If the moderator thinks it is not political, he/she will move it.

The Duggars are also the epitome of extreme right wing values.

is a liberal smear tactic? The Duggars are tight with many GOP candidates. Josh worked with Tony Perkins, spoke at rallies for GOP candidates.. and Mike did immediately leap to the Duggars' defense. So what part is a smear tactic? Is it the sentence saying that the Duggars are the epitome of extreme right wing values? Maybe it is the use of the word "values" to describe the behavior of the Duggars?

Originally Posted by Guest

What part of



is a liberal smear tactic? The Duggars are tight with many GOP candidates. Josh worked with Tony Perkins, spoke at rallies for GOP candidates.. and Mike did immediately leap to the Duggars' defense. So what part is a smear tactic? Is it the sentence saying that the Duggars are the epitome of extreme right wing values? Maybe it is the use of the word "values" to describe the behavior of the Duggars?

WOW to this post is all I got. Amazing how inherent hate will shape you.

Originally Posted by Guest

Because the Duggars are very tight with a number of the GOP candidates, especially Mike Huckabee who immediately came out in their defense. If the moderator thinks it is not political, he/she will move it.

The Duggars are also the epitome of extreme right wing values.

President Obama was "tight" with Rev Wright....President Obama was "tight" with Bill Ayers...President Obama was tight with too many radicals to mention.

Not a problem ??

Originally Posted by Guest

President Obama was "tight" with Rev Wright....President Obama was "tight" with Bill Ayers...President Obama was tight with too many radicals to mention.

Not a problem ??

The difference is the president never called out these right wing nut jobs and told them that their policies were causing young children to be molested, while harboring a child molester, like the Duggars do when they rail against transgender people using public restrooms.

And by the way, the voters didn't care.

Originally Posted by Guest

The difference is the president never called out these right wing nut jobs and told them that their policies were causing young children to be molested, while harboring a child molester, like the Duggars do when they rail against transgender people using public restrooms.

And by the way, the voters didn't care.

Ok. Hold on.

Exactly what did you have in mind with this thread and be clear.

If it is about the Duggars, take it elsewhere unless discussion of reality shows is now politics.

If you simply wish to tell everyone that Huckabee said something like whatever took place was inexcusable, but not unforgivable (neighbor lady who keeps up with such things told me that so if I am wrong in what he said, I apologize)not then explain the correlation between what he said and anything political.

That terrible Huckabee...what a demon he is. Now Obama on the other hand was "tight" with Ayers, but denied any association with his views (while standing in his living room)....was ""tight" with Rev Wright for many many years, and was "mentored" (Obama words, not mine)...,but denied association with the racist white hatred speak.

I think it is just another desperate attempt to throw some kind of mud and smear. As the new best seller points out, you folks make a mockery of free speech, or heck as the head of NOW said about our President was demeaning to women because they had the nerve to disagree with him.