Originally Posted by Guest

And you know this how? I call bull****.

You call BS. I call you an Idiot. Learn to use the Google search engine. And, please stop with the "And you know this how?" questions! It really makes you look stupid.

Originally Posted by Guest

You are either brain washed.
Or a partisan, party first, no matter who or what?
You just don't care?
Or you may be full of something that is impairing rational thinking.

ANYBODY who thinks Clinton is out for anybody but Clinton is in fact unconscious.

Why else would ANYBODY thinkk a felon, negligent, careless, liar, unsophisticated in security,crony, politics as usual, haggard old broad is better than bird crap on a rail?

your off your medication again aren't you!

Originally Posted by Guest

Hillary Clinton Demands Equal Pay But Doesn’t Put Her Money Where Her Mouth Is

from your source


"During her time in the U.S. Senate, Clinton paid women in her office 72 cents for each dollar paid to men, according to a report by Washington Free Beacon."

Who is the Washington Beacon?

"The Washington Free Beacon is an American politically conservative political journalism website that publishes news and opinion commentary."

There is another site with different results and a different opinion.

Gender Pay Gap in Clinton’s Senate Office?

Originally Posted by Guest

I don't think his dad was in the top 1% let alone the top 1/10th of 1%. Trumps in the top 1%.

Or so he says. The public has not seen one iota of proof what Donald Trump's true wealth is.

Originally Posted by Guest

from your source


"During her time in the U.S. Senate, Clinton paid women in her office 72 cents for each dollar paid to men, according to a report by Washington Free Beacon."

Who is the Washington Beacon?

"The Washington Free Beacon is an American politically conservative political journalism website that publishes news and opinion commentary."

There is another site with different results and a different opinion.

Gender Pay Gap in Clinton’s Senate Office?

From your source:

"But annual salary data provided by the Clinton campaign show median salaries for men and women in Clinton’s office were virtually identical."

The bold underlined print says it all. Who would take the word of a known lair as being fact?

Originally Posted by Guest

From your source:

"But annual salary data provided by the Clinton campaign show median salaries for men and women in Clinton’s office were virtually identical."

The bold underlined print says it all. Who would take the word of a known lair as being fact?

"A comparison of both data sets shows that those who only worked part of the year represent a little over half of the men and women who worked in Clinton’s Senate office that year. Among those who only worked part of the fiscal year, and would not have counted in the Free Beacon analysis, the average and median salaries were higher for women. The median annual salary for women who worked only part of the year was $38,000, compared with $35,000 for men, our analysis of the Clinton salary database showed. The Clinton campaign argues that including those who only worked part of the year makes more sense, because it shows that women and men were offered comparable salaries."

Originally Posted by Guest

"A comparison of both data sets shows that those who only worked part of the year represent a little over half of the men and women who worked in Clinton’s Senate office that year. Among those who only worked part of the fiscal year, and would not have counted in the Free Beacon analysis, the average and median salaries were higher for women. The median annual salary for women who worked only part of the year was $38,000, compared with $35,000 for men, our analysis of the Clinton salary database showed. The Clinton campaign argues that including those who only worked part of the year makes more sense, because it shows that women and men were offered comparable salaries."

So, women were actually getting paid MORE than men, how is that pay equality? Seems to me that the men who worked for Hillary were treated unfairly in terms of monetary compensation. Don't you agree?

Originally Posted by Guest

So, women were actually getting paid MORE than men, how is that pay equality? Seems to me that the men who worked for Hillary were treated unfairly in terms of monetary compensation. Don't you agree?

The Pew "Research Center, for example, did estimates based on hourly earnings of both full- and part-time workers and found that women earn 84 percent of what men earn. Why? According to Pew’s surveys, women were more likely to take career interruptions to care for their family, which can hurt long-term earnings. In addition, Pew noted, “women as a whole continue to work in lower-paying occupations than men do.” And last, Pew noted “some part of the pay gap may also be due to gender discrimination.” Women were nearly twice as likely as men to report that they had been discriminated against at work because of their gender."

I think it is unrealistic to think that in all cases the salaries will be equal for many different reasons.

Hillary is just blowing smoke up everyone's posterior when she promises to make women's wages equal. They already are equal. If a woman is doing the same job, she gets paid the same. It's federal law. So, if anyone wishes to listen to her, they need to keep this in mind when she is moving her lips. SHE IS A LIAR, ALWAYS HAS BEEN AND ALWAYS WILL BE.......until she drops dead...hopefully sooner, rather than later.

Originally Posted by Guest

SHE IS A LIAR, ALWAYS HAS BEEN AND ALWAYS WILL BE.......until she drops dead...hopefully sooner, rather than later.

I knew you weren't human but you certainly had me fooled for a little while.

Originally Posted by Guest

I knew you weren't human but you certainly had me fooled for a little while.

Liberals have always been easy to fool.

Originally Posted by Guest

Liberals have always been easy to fool.

The downside of being open minded is that you expect everyone has a moral compass.

Originally Posted by Guest

The downside of being open minded is that you expect everyone has a moral compass.

Well said.

Originally Posted by Guest

The downside of being open minded is that you expect everyone has a moral compass.

Naive is perhaps a better description of liberals than "open minded". I have also found that while liberals claim to be open minded, they are not open minded when it comes to dissenting opinions, ideas, views and ideology.

Gender Pay Gap in Clinton’s Senate Office?

I would vote for Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump no matter who Trump puts in as his Vice President. I have no trust in that con man who will probably be impeached quite soon if he for some strange reason becomes President of the United States.

I just hope they move on the Trump University case and I have some option other than Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton.