As reported on the news tonight there is some confustion as to the facts
of this case. Allegedly Trayvon was on top of the Officer and it was the
Officer who was shouting for help not Trayvon. This was statements from
a neighbor who heard the cries for help looked out and called 911. In addition
the officer allegedly has a broken nose, cuts, etc. Given this it is another case of "rush to judgement" before hearing all the facts. As far as Sharpton is concerned I know the family that was being accused in the Brawley case, (Pagones) who was an assistent DA and a fine person as was/is his family.
Sharpton ruined his reputation and when Pagones sued and won Sharpton has allegedly not paid him for the unfounded, untrue accusations that he [Sharpton] made. Anyone who supports or sticks up for this man obviously have not done their homework to know the facts of the Brawley case.
I don't know who was at fault in the Trayvon case and therefore will wait for the facts before just accusing the Officer.

Originally Posted by PennBF

As reported on the news tonight there is some confustion as to the facts
of this case. Allegedly Trayvon was on top of the Officer and it was the
Officer who was shouting for help not Trayvon. This was statements from
a neighbor who heard the cries for help looked out and called 911. In addition
the officer allegedly has a broken nose, cuts, etc. Given this it is another case of "rush to judgement" before hearing all the facts. As far as Sharpton is concerned I know the family that was being accused in the Brawley case, (Pagones) who was an assistent DA and a fine person as was/is his family.
Sharpton ruined his reputation and when Pagones sued and won Sharpton has allegedly not paid him for the unfounded, untrue accusations that he [Sharpton] made. Anyone who supports or sticks up for this man obviously have not done their homework to know the facts of the Brawley case.
I don't know who was at fault in the Trayvon case and therefore will wait for the facts before just accusing the Officer.

I think in this matter,you must supply a link for the information you are alluding to