Multiple Political Ads - Change your view?? Multiple Political Ads - Change your view?? - Page 2 - Talk of The Villages Florida

Multiple Political Ads - Change your view??

 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 07-29-2012, 04:16 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eweissenbach View Post
Would you suggest a minimum IQ, or another intelligence test, or current events exam to qualify to vote?
Quote:
Originally Posted by eweissenbach View Post
In answer to my own post; I would have people sit in a voting booth and before they vote they would have to answer a single question. Has your vote been in any way influenced positively or negatively by a television, print, or radio advertisement? An answer in the affirmative would activate an ejection seat and the hopeful voter would be catapulted from the polling site.
re ? #1 - i think the country has already been down that road and it didn't last.

re your response to ? #1 - too funny for words!
  #17  
Old 07-29-2012, 04:17 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golfingnut View Post
I will research to verify and if this is true about Romney, Obama has my vote.
Here is just one of many links you will get if you google 'Romney supports personhood amendment'. Read the conversation Romney had with Mike Huckabee on Huckabee's TV show.


Romney campaign: Personhood a state call - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com
  #18  
Old 07-29-2012, 04:17 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by janmcn View Post
If Mitt Romney gets elected, that means there will be a wave of republicans elected from coast to coast, probably holding the house and taking the senate. Most of those tea party types are more stringent than Romney and will be even more in favor of restricting women's rights. Just look at what has been happening at the state level in the past two years...1100 laws proposed in 2011 and well on the way to surpassing that number this year. Remember all the state-madated vaginal-probe laws passed by republican legislatures?
another poltical assumption intended to scare the begeesus outta independent voters! hooey!
  #19  
Old 07-29-2012, 04:48 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by njbchbum View Post
another poltical assumption intended to scare the begeesus outta independent voters! hooey!
You are correct. Mitt Romney is enough to scare the begeesus outta independent voters. Just sayin.
  #20  
Old 07-29-2012, 05:49 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by janmcn View Post
Here is just one of many links you will get if you google 'Romney supports personhood amendment'. Read the conversation Romney had with Mike Huckabee on Huckabee's TV show.


Romney campaign: Personhood a state call - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com
Wow. He has lost my vote and anyone I can talk to about him.
  #21  
Old 07-29-2012, 05:56 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

LEGAL TO KILL IN ALL 50 STATES

Photo of model of a baby after 12 weeks of development.



The Villages Florida


One Tiny Life
  #22  
Old 07-29-2012, 06:01 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eweissenbach View Post
In answer to my own post; I would have people sit in a voting booth and before they vote they would have to answer a single question. Has your vote been in any way influenced positively or negatively by a television, print, or radio advertisement? An answer in the affirmative would activate an ejection seat and the hopeful voter would be catapulted from the polling site.
eweissenbach the measurement would not be intelligence quotient but rather their emotional quotient and based on what passes as presidential criteria the fail/pass ratio is well....................
  #23  
Old 07-29-2012, 06:02 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichieLion View Post
LEGAL TO KILL IN ALL 50 STATES

Photo of model of a baby after 12 weeks of development.



The Villages Florida


One Tiny Life
One of your more repulsive posts
  #24  
Old 07-29-2012, 06:03 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigalibaba View Post
One of your more repulsive posts
You don't like babies?

That's pretty repulsive in my opinion.

(I know.......you're just upset to see a picture of what liberals feel is OK to terminate for any reason..........I can't blame you, really)
  #25  
Old 07-29-2012, 07:32 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichieLion View Post
You don't like babies?

That's pretty repulsive in my opinion.

(I know.......you're just upset to see a picture of what liberals feel is OK to terminate for any reason..........I can't blame you, really)
It makes you wonder how Mitt Romney could support a woman's right to choose when he ran for the senate in 1994 against Ted Kennedy.
  #26  
Old 07-29-2012, 07:41 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by janmcn View Post
It makes you wonder how Mitt Romney could support a woman's right to choose when he ran for the senate in 1994 against Ted Kennedy.
at least he has learned the error of his ways and has evolved to see a better light. evolving is good - right?
  #27  
Old 07-29-2012, 08:03 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There's a very good reason why Mitt the Twitt (as the Brits call him) is a flip flopper. Which is something all the other R candidates pointed out many, many times during the primaries.

Mitt the Twitt trying to flip flop his way to the top.
  #28  
Old 07-29-2012, 08:23 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If someone were to make a remark about the President using this kind of language, sarcasm and ridicule, would it be considered racist ?
  #29  
Old 07-29-2012, 08:29 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Personally, I think it was disgraceful for the Brits to call the presumptive Republican Nomineee Mitt the Twit.

It was also not very nice of the Brits to say that Mitt the Twit was worse than Palin !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  #30  
Old 07-29-2012, 08:36 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coralway View Post
Personally, I think it was disgraceful for the Brits to call the presumptive Republican Nomineee Mitt the Twit.

It was also not very nice of the Brits to say that Mitt the Twit was worse than Palin !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and it is not nice of you to say that mitt has flip flopped on pro-choice/pro-life - he has evolved...just like obama did re gay marriage.
 


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 AM.