The United Nations has proposed a global “Small Arms Treaty”, with the strong support of the Obama regime, that is premised to fight “terrorism”, “insurgency” and “international crime syndicates”. You can bet your bottom dollar that an even more insidious threat is being targeted, which is the Constitutional right for law-abiding citizens to own and bear arms.

It is being reported that Pres. Obama and Secretary Hillary Clinton will sign this treaty on July 27th, under the radar of the main stream media which are twiddling their thumbs.

The reported terms of this agreement which would have to be ratified by our Senate are:

"1. Enact tougher licensing requirements, creating additional bureaucratic red tape for legal firearms ownership.

2. Confiscate and destroy all “unauthorized” civilian firearms (exempting those owned by our government of course).

3. Ban the trade, sale and private ownership of all semi-automatic weapons (any that have magazines even though they still operate in the same one trigger pull – one single “bang” manner as revolvers, a simple fact the anti-gun media never seem to grasp).

4. Create an international gun registry, clearly setting the stage for full-scale gun confiscation.

5. In short, overriding our national sovereignty, and in the process, providing license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights."

You probably have not heard (since our media doesn't report much negative Obama stories) that the Obama Administration is very supportive of this U.N. gambit to restrict private gun ownership on a global level.

"In January 2010, the U.S. joined 152 other countries in endorsing a U.N. Arms Treaty Resolution that will establish a 2012 conference to draft a blueprint for enactment. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has pledged to push for Senate ratification."

Now, more than ever before, it’s imperative that we stick to our guns in demanding that all Constitutional rights be preserved. If we don't, we will surely lose both.

U.N. Agreement Should Have All Gun Owners Up In Arms - Forbes

Dick Morris: Obama Set To Sign UN Gun Control Treaty, July 27 (Video) « Nice Deb

Obama to Approve UN Gun Grab July 27 - By Stephani Scruggs with Unite In Action - Constitutional Emergency

Originally Posted by RichieLion

The United Nations has proposed a global “Small Arms Treaty”, with the strong support of the Obama regime, that is premised to fight “terrorism”, “insurgency” and “international crime syndicates”. You can bet your bottom dollar that an even more insidious threat is being targeted, which is the Constitutional right for law-abiding citizens to own and bear arms.

It is being reported that Pres. Obama and Secretary Hillary Clinton will sign this treaty on July 27th, under the radar of the main stream media which are twiddling their thumbs.

The reported terms of this agreement which would have to be ratified by our Senate are:

"1. Enact tougher licensing requirements, creating additional bureaucratic red tape for legal firearms ownership.

2. Confiscate and destroy all “unauthorized” civilian firearms (exempting those owned by our government of course).

3. Ban the trade, sale and private ownership of all semi-automatic weapons (any that have magazines even though they still operate in the same one trigger pull – one single “bang” manner as revolvers, a simple fact the anti-gun media never seem to grasp).

4. Create an international gun registry, clearly setting the stage for full-scale gun confiscation.

5. In short, overriding our national sovereignty, and in the process, providing license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights."

You probably have not heard (since our media doesn't report much negative Obama stories) that the Obama Administration is very supportive of this U.N. gambit to restrict private gun ownership on a global level.

"In January 2010, the U.S. joined 152 other countries in endorsing a U.N. Arms Treaty Resolution that will establish a 2012 conference to draft a blueprint for enactment. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has pledged to push for Senate ratification."

Now, more than ever before, it’s imperative that we stick to our guns in demanding that all Constitutional rights be preserved. If we don't, we will surely lose both.

U.N. Agreement Should Have All Gun Owners Up In Arms - Forbes

Dick Morris: Obama Set To Sign UN Gun Control Treaty, July 27 (Video) « Nice Deb

Obama to Approve UN Gun Grab July 27 - By Stephani Scruggs with Unite In Action - Constitutional Emergency

The single biggest item on here, TO ME, is the loss of our national sovereignty which has a been a common theme thorough out this administration.

We are fast losing this country !

One it ain't gonna happen.

In the unlikely event it did does anybody think the gun owners of the world are gonna say here are mine?

Plus in the unlikely event it would pass we all know we can ignore the law with no penalty as exemplified by illegal immigration.

And do these so called worldly gun activists think for one second they will impact s that terrorists and the non law abiding folks have.

I believe the term is frivilous. Just another back door deal by the back door specialist Obama.

What he would lose for sure the gun owning democrats. I do believe they would be in line with the rest of us to not vote for Obama......it may be party first for some of you no matter what....but I would bet on the gun owning Dd to send the message for Obama to take a long overdue hike.

btk

Originally Posted by billethkid

One it ain't gonna happen.

In the unlikely event it did does anybody think the gun owners of the world are gonna say here are mine?

Plus in the unlikely event it would pass we all know we can ignore the law with no penalty as exemplified by illegal immigration.

And do these so called worldly gun activists think for one second they will impact s that terrorists and the non law abiding folks have.

I believe the term is frivilous. Just another back door deal by the back door specialist Obama.

What he would lose for sure the gun owning democrats. I do believe they would be in line with the rest of us to not vote for Obama......it may be party first for some of you no matter what....but I would bet on the gun owning Dd to send the message for Obama to take a long overdue hike.

btk

I was told by many learned people that the ObamaCare legislation would never pass as it is clearly unconstitutional. We know how that activist decision turned out. I'm having real doubts about any scheme of the Obama Regime really needing to pass constitutional muster.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

I was told by many learned people that the ObamaCare legislation would never pass as it is clearly unconstitutional. We know how that activist decision turned out. I'm having real doubts about any scheme of the Obama Regime really needing to pass constitutional muster.

He sort of does what he wants doesnt he ? He didnt like the marriage act so he told Holder...dont enforce that law. He didnt like the Arizona law, so dont enforce that. He thought the law on immigration to be a political libality so lets not enforce that THIS YEAR...we did, but now we wont...it is reelection time.

Thought this was a government of laws and not men !

any treaty needs approval of 2/3 rds vote in the US senate. That's 67 votes needed for ratification. End of this non-story.

Originally Posted by Bucco

The single biggest item on here, TO ME, is the loss of our national sovereignty which has a been a common theme thorough out this administration.

We are fast losing this country !

Where has it gone? Gosh, I sure hope we can find it.

Originally Posted by waynet

any treaty needs approval of 2/3 rds vote in the US senate. That's 67 votes needed for ratification. End of this non-story.

It appears that this president seems to have the power to do whatever he wants regardless of the Houses.

I'm sure he has some scheme to appropriate the power to unilaterally do this if he wants. I'm not saying it will work, but he does seem to get what he wants regardless of the Houses, the Constitution or the basic rule of law.

HOW ABOUT THIS??

IRAN has been named as part of the "bureau" that will oversee the U.N. "Arms Treaty" that Hillary Clinton has vowed to sign, along with Obama.
Iran to Oversee U.N. Arms Treaty Conference;

Support for the UN Arms Treaty is a further indication of Obama's International agenda. Obama told you who he was long before he ran for office. Far too many people did not listen. A country like Iran would jump at the chance to latch on to a legal reason to stamp out their peoples revolution against them. Every murderous dictator must be jumping for glee to find this boondoggle drop into their laps. Team Obama not only sickens me Team Obama frightens the bejesus out of me. However what equally concerns me are the American people who continually are taken in by this enemy of these United States. I say "concerns me" because Obama continues to hit us over the head with the proverbial bat and these foks rejoice in joy. Just like the communist did in Easer Europe he applies the salaimi technique, taking freedoms away from us one slice at a time so some of us don't notice . I really can't take much more of this guy

The United Nations is a joke, but a dangerous joke. Just look at the countries that are on the Human Rights Commission. If you don't think that this can happen, might be time to get your head out of the sand and take a look around. But then who is going to enforce this treaty? Someone, including local, state and Federal agency will have to start going house to house to gather up all these evil guns. I know that I don't want to be on that team, could cut your chance to draw retirement really short.

Originally Posted by Figmo Bohica

The United Nations is a joke, but a dangerous joke. Just look at the countries that are on the Human Rights Commission. If you don't think that this can happen, might be time to get your head out of the sand and take a look around. But then who is going to enforce this treaty? Someone, including local, state and Federal agency will have to start going house to house to gather up all these evil guns. I know that I don't want to be on that team, could cut your chance to draw retirement really short.

figmo bochica: The fact is the UN is an enemy of the United States, worthless and as a taxpayer I am sick of supporting them. Now I wait to hear the liberals tell me that my infantile mentality is what creates problems
Is the US ever going to get back to "maning up"? I am not saying hot headedness. I long for the Truman's and Reagan's type leadership. all we have now is an apologist

My apologies to all clear thinking people.

some of us look forward to you actually addressing an issue without the terse, meaningful only to you one liners.

Might suggest a lack of knowledge, but an over riding need to respond....hence the sometimes smart a$$ inflection to many responses.

btk

Originally Posted by billethkid

some of us look forward to you actually addressing an issue without the terse, meaningful only to you one liners.

Might suggest a lack of knowledge, but an over riding need to respond....hence the sometimes smart a$$ inflection to many responses.

btk

It's best not to comment on those kinds of posts which say nothing.

It's can be perceived as a "personal comment" which will probably be reported to the Admin by the same "saying nothing" person you're talking to, or by an ally, who will profess hurt feelings.

Just glance over your shoulder and let it go the same way you would if someone was walking down the street talking to themselves.

Best overall policy I've found.