On the subject of super delegates...have the potential to swing the nomination ignoring the democratic popular voters choice completely.

I am surprised the super delegate concept has not come under fire yet.

The following article pretty much states that whatever the people vote turns out some (?) of the super delegates will still back Clinton.

Who chooses, we the people or the super delegates?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/poli...icle-1.2581729

Of course they will chose Clinton. It's either Clinton the criminal, liar and thief or Sanders, the commie. The old corps Democrat elite are not going to to socialism quietly, even if they are so far left that they make liberal look conservative. Sanders won't sell out to the establishment, but Hillary will/has. She'll do anything for the ego trip. Sander's only reason for being in the campaign is because the democrat party needed a faux competitor for Hillary. They never figured he would garner this many voting age kids that would vote for him. And they didn't figure on how many Dems hate Hillary and would vote Republican before voting for that scumbag.

Originally Posted by Guest

On the subject of super delegates...have the potential to swing the nomination ignoring the democratic popular voters choice completely.

I am surprised the super delegate concept has not come under fire yet.

The following article pretty much states that whatever the people vote turns out some (?) of the super delegates will still back Clinton.

Who chooses, we the people or the super delegates?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/poli...icle-1.2581729

We the People is a catch phrase for the right wing.... I don't think they care.

Originally Posted by Guest

Of course they will chose Clinton. It's either Clinton the criminal, liar and thief or Sanders, the commie. The old corps Democrat elite are not going to to socialism quietly, even if they are so far left that they make liberal look conservative. Sanders won't sell out to the establishment, but Hillary will/has. She'll do anything for the ego trip. Sander's only reason for being in the campaign is because the democrat party needed a faux competitor for Hillary. They never figured he would garner this many voting age kids that would vote for him. And they didn't figure on how many Dems hate Hillary and would vote Republican before voting for that scumbag.

And just when are you all going to realize that you have a scumbag as your standard bearer?

Did you hear the latest attack on women cause I did!!!!

Originally Posted by Guest

And just when are you all going to realize that you have a scumbag as your standard bearer?

Did you hear the latest attack on women cause I did!!!!

Sure you did. I have heard you say this on several posts, but no direct quotes. Just more trolling.

Super Delegates. Proof that there is no Democratic in the Democrat party. Might as well drop the Democratic part and just come out of the closet as the true Socialists they are. Or, are they afraid they will lose their voter base?

Originally Posted by Guest

Sure you did. I have heard you say this on several posts, but no direct quotes. Just more trolling.

This just in:

Donald Trump struggles to clarify abortion remarks - CNNPolitics.com

When you don't know whats going on your only response is

TROLL.......

Please, I know its hard, but try and keep up!

Originally Posted by Guest

On the subject of super delegates...have the potential to swing the nomination ignoring the democratic popular voters choice completely.

I am surprised the super delegate concept has not come under fire yet.

The following article pretty much states that whatever the people vote turns out some (?) of the super delegates will still back Clinton.

Who chooses, we the people or the super delegates?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/poli...icle-1.2581729

Originally Posted by Guest

Super Delegates. Proof that there is no Democratic in the Democrat party. Might as well drop the Democratic part and just come out of the closet as the true Socialists they are. Or, are they afraid they will lose their voter base?

"super delegates" determine who wins the race for president anyway. The Electoral College vote is the ONLY vote that counts. The president is NOT chosen in Nov, they are chosen in Jan. You think the founders were stupid enough to let the ignorant rabble determine ANYTHING of importance? This primary fiasco is just getting people used to the idea that voting doesn't change anything, if it did, they wouldn't let us do it. The R party is rigging their election against Trump, the D party is rigging the election for Hillary. Both parties are completely corrupt and you should vote for anyone but a D or R.

Originally Posted by Guest

"super delegates" determine who wins the race for president anyway. The Electoral College vote is the ONLY vote that counts. The president is NOT chosen in Nov, they are chosen in Jan. You think the founders were stupid enough to let the ignorant rabble determine ANYTHING of importance? This primary fiasco is just getting people used to the idea that voting doesn't change anything, if it did, they wouldn't let us do it. The R party is rigging their election against Trump, the D party is rigging the election for Hillary. Both parties are completely corrupt and you should vote for anyone but a D or R.

Explain how the Electoral College works or point us to a reliable source, This always confused me.

Originally Posted by Guest

This just in:

Donald Trump struggles to clarify abortion remarks - CNNPolitics.com

When you don't know whats going on your only response is

TROLL.......

Please, I know its hard, but try and keep up!

That was his opinion on abortion. That was not an attack on women. You are wrong again. You make blatant statements, attempting to demonize someone that you don't agree with. At least be honest.

Originally Posted by Guest

This just in:

Donald Trump struggles to clarify abortion remarks - CNNPolitics.com

When you don't know whats going on your only response is

TROLL.......

Please, I know its hard, but try and keep up!

All the GOP candidates have stated their opposition to abortion. The religious and Christian citizens are also against abortion. That's not a war on women, as you libtards like to indicate. The liberal media attempts to control the conversation by bringing up a dead issue to provoke. Liberals have their war on babies, a real war that murders babies and they want to twist it to reflect a war on women's rights. You liberals are just warped. Remember, you brought it up again, not me. The law is already protecting abortion, so why do you insist on bringing it back up again, if not to provoke?

Originally Posted by Guest

That was his opinion on abortion. That was not an attack on women. You are wrong again. You make blatant statements, attempting to demonize someone that you don't agree with. At least be honest.

Just another opinion.
Trump does not do well thinking on his feet. He said he is pro choice. That both the woman and the doctor should be punished for an illegal abortion.
Then he released a statement that only the doctor should be punished and his position has not changed.

In the interview he wants to punish the woman. Is punishing woman that are criminals an attack on women?

In the statement he said to not punish woman.

He changed his mind and said he did not change his mind. He can't have it both ways. He will say whatever you him to say to win your vote and hope you don't read everything.

Originally Posted by Guest

Just another opinion.
Trump does not do well thinking on his feet. He said he is pro choice. That both the woman and the doctor should be punished for an illegal abortion.
Then he released a statement that only the doctor should be punished and his position has not changed.

In the interview he wants to punish the woman. Is punishing woman that are criminals an attack on women?

In the statement he said to not punish woman.

He changed his mind and said he did not change his mind. He can't have it both ways. He will say whatever you him to say to win your vote and hope you don't read everything.

Oh no! He is turning into a politician. The world is doomed!

Originally Posted by Guest

Oh no! He is turning into a politician. The world is doomed!

And he has not assigned someone to get ahead of controversy by having someone else say,what he meant to say was..... or that is not what he meant to say......or some other cop out commenatry.....

you know what I am talking about....what Obama's cover his a$$ team does all day every day.

Originally Posted by Guest

And he has not assigned someone to get ahead of controversy by having someone else say,what he meant to say was..... or that is not what he meant to say......or some other cop out commenatry.....

you know what I am talking about....what Obama's cover his a$$ team does all day every day.