![]() |
Sending in the Unions
Looks like they are going to send in the union thugs to confront angry patriots at the town hall meetings. Unions are paying back Obama for the neat auto bail-outs?
http://sistertoldjah.com/ ( note..this is not a news link) |
The following article sums up the so called demonstrations:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...330098540.html
There was a clip on the news this morning asking if folks remember when Obama was running for POTUS....at one of his town hall meetings he said something to the effect....get in your neighbors face, tell them what you believe.....and now those who are doing so....are being called "manufactured"....a mob... I think we may have finally found the cause celeb that is getting to we the people....they are finally seeing this is in my back yard....this IS going to affect ME....FINALLY....HOPEFULLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! btk |
Angry Patriots?
Quote:
Whoever is disrupting the meetings are doing the public a diservice by interfering with the process of the public communicating with their elected representatives. |
Quote:
The democrats should be ashamed. These are real legitimately unhappy people.... just like the Tea Party Patriots. I guess it worked VK...I took your bait!!! http://www.nypost.com/seven/08072009...ity_183409.htm |
Quote:
The Kahuna has it right.... why are people dedicated to mis-information.. just give it to us straight and you can make a decision ONE WAY OR THE OTHER. BUT in these times TOO many people just listen to sound bites from their favorite talking head and believe every word. |
Quote:
However regardless of the kernel of the protests, one cannot help but smirk at the irony of an administration centered on a man who earned his chops organizing "spontaneous" protests and who endorsed in-your-face confrontations during his campaign now crying that their opponents are using their tactics and it's not fair. ` |
Quote:
|
What Was Important
Quote:
But the last paragraph WAS the most important, as you noted. I wouldn't go to a meeting held by Ginny Brown-Waite on this subject if she held one at Lake Sumter Landing, 10 minutes from my house. I "did my thing" by sending her and the two Senators an e-mail with my feelings on the needed healthcare reform. I know that my comments will be "check marked" on some report of constituent contacts, which is probably better than you could in communicating your feelings than at an unruly town hall meeting. By the way, here were the items I listed as important to me in any healthcare reform legislation...
|
Quote:
|
Just My 2 Cents
Quote:
|
Quote:
- I still don't know what "tort reform" is. What is hoped to be accomplished with giving limited/blanket immunity for damages to the medical profession? By private and CBO estimation, it won't reduce health care costs (as California and other states with damage caps have foun d out). - Regarding Medicare, I agree. - Healthcare for 100% of American citizens - we already have the US Public Health Service with hospitals, clinics and services all over the country. Is the issue more one of convenience to services, as we already have "national health care" being provided by the USPHS ? - As long as a person shows up at an ER, no ER can refuse the person. This is really an issue of payment for ER service. As most of the non-citizens who seek American ER service are from countries receiving foreign aid for one reason or another, let's just reduce the foreign aid to that country $per$ for health care expenses to non-citizens. - So, do folk get a USPHS Health Care Card on some means-tested or circumstance-tested criteria? The folk then get the medical services from USPHS Plan Participants (like what happens with private insurance now), or file claims with USPHS for payment? Will this generate a USPHS Supplement market? Again, those "nasty details" again. We already have USPHS, so if there is such a clamor for all-folk access to health care controlled, managed and dispensed by the government, then why haven't ANY of the proposals built themselves on existing architecture? This "it's gotta be new and unique" is so illogical, especially when HHS (and USPHS) have management and delivery systems in place that are already tried and true. I guess it's just not sexy enough for politicians to build on what's already there, when they can instead show themselves as New Age Thinkers. We spent a lot of money already for HHS and USPHS. I guess we're supposed to consider those moneys as down the sewer, and just start anew with borrowed money and more debt. |
2 cents+
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.moonbattery.com/. |
Another scary thought...
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.