Rice: I leaked NOTHING to NOBODY Rice: I leaked NOTHING to NOBODY - Talk of The Villages Florida

Rice: I leaked NOTHING to NOBODY

 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-04-2017, 04:01 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default Rice: I leaked NOTHING to NOBODY

Susan Rice Doesn’t Deny Unmasking Trump Associates | Power Line

----------------
""I leaked nothing to nobody and never have and never would," Rice said. " (Someone give her a few pointers on the proper way to word her comment so that she does not appear an uneducated gang banger)

Susan Rice Speaks Out on ‘Unmasking’ Accusations: : ‘I Leaked Nothing to Nobody’
----------------------
FLASHBACK: Susan Rice Says She 'Knows Nothing' About Surveillance in March Interview

FLASHBACK: Susan Rice Says She 'Knows Nothing' About Surveillance in March Interview - Fox Nation

-------------

SO the question is: Who is "Nobody?"
  #2  
Old 04-04-2017, 04:03 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Search Twitter - rice's denial
  #3  
Old 04-04-2017, 04:06 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Body Language Expert: Susan Rice Was Clearly Lying When She Denied Obama Surveillance of Trump >> Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

A body language expert who analyzed a video of Susan Rice says Barack Obama’s former national security adviser was clearly lying when she denied having any knowledge of Trump transition members being spied on.

During a March 22 appearance on PBS NewsHour, Rice claimed she “knew nothing” about Rep. Devin Nunes’s assertion that Trump transition members had their communications surveilled by the Obama administration.

It has since been revealed that Rice repeatedly requested to unmask the identities of individuals who were the subject of “incidental” surveillance.

According to a body language expert, Rice was clearly being deceptive when she claimed to have no knowledge of the surveillance.
  #4  
Old 04-04-2017, 05:44 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

She is the perfect example of the lying, weasel, Obama lap dog.

Benghazzi........head liar and manipulator.

Bo Begdahl.....diareha from her mouth.

I would like to hear from those who are always slamming the reublican anything what their opinion is of Rice. Don't let my tempered opinion of her slant the response.

Let's see how long the subject and posts remain about Rice.
  #5  
Old 04-04-2017, 06:03 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Body Language Expert: Susan Rice Was Clearly Lying When She Denied Obama Surveillance of Trump >> Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

A body language expert who analyzed a video of Susan Rice says Barack Obama’s former national security adviser was clearly lying when she denied having any knowledge of Trump transition members being spied on.

During a March 22 appearance on PBS NewsHour, Rice claimed she “knew nothing” about Rep. Devin Nunes’s assertion that Trump transition members had their communications surveilled by the Obama administration.

It has since been revealed that Rice repeatedly requested to unmask the identities of individuals who were the subject of “incidental” surveillance.

According to a body language expert, Rice was clearly being deceptive when she claimed to have no knowledge of the surveillance.
Alex Jones? Looks like garbage. Smells like garbage. Probably is garbage.
  #6  
Old 04-04-2017, 09:58 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 View Post
Alex Jones? Looks like garbage. Smells like garbage. Probably is garbage.
MDCPD has no credence. Alex Jones as his source is a forever black mark.

Sent from my SM-T310 using Tapatalk
  #7  
Old 04-04-2017, 10:13 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

The Villages Florida
  #8  
Old 04-05-2017, 03:56 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
MDCPD has no credence. Alex Jones as his source is a forever black mark.

Sent from my SM-T310 using Tapatalk
So rainman, that's the best you can come up with? Are you denying anything that was linked or are you just going to disparage one source out of four? Sometimes it is difficult to find the right link that you and your ilk can't complain about. After all, how many libtard news media networks even gave Rice's contribution to the felonies any air time? They are like you, in Denial. While some of us are discussing D.C. corruption, fools like you on the left will disparage Trump's wife over her ring or her portrait. You will find Trump's latest tweet more important than any of his policies. Trump's playing golf after a week of 18 hr work days is more important to you than the meeting and discussions he is having during his golfing weekend. It is no wonder why you are in the life situation you are in, when you are a taker rather than a contributor.
  #9  
Old 04-05-2017, 05:05 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

This is worse than Watergate. Why is it that Rice can consistently lie and deceive and is not held accountable? Is it really because of her race?
  #10  
Old 04-05-2017, 06:38 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
This is worse than Watergate. Why is it that Rice can consistently lie and deceive and is not held accountable? Is it really because of her race?
You guys are a riot. Rice did nothing wrong that I can see. https://www.wired.com/2017/04/sorry-...t-smoking-gun/ Donald John Trump has a very long history of wrong-doing and you just ignore it.

And those rainman insults are getting old. I went to law school and graduated and the Dean -- Stein who also ran the American Bar Association for a while-- introduced me as a Professor to the Law School Class coming in.

My mother was sick when I was in her womb so I do have some speech problems on occasion and had a lot of co-ordination problems as well. And I was in a camp for those with developmental problems when I was around 5 or 6 and have some extremely bad memories about it.

It is like you people will do anything no matter how despicable to defend your traitorous Trump.
  #11  
Old 04-05-2017, 07:50 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
This is worse than Watergate. Why is it that Rice can consistently lie and deceive and is not held accountable? Is it really because of her race?

SUSAN RICE AND THE LATEST BOGUS ATTEMPT TO JUSTIFY TRUMP’S WIRETAPPING TWEET

Susan Rice and the Latest Bogus Attempt to Justify Trump’s Wiretapping Tweet - The New Yorker
  #12  
Old 04-05-2017, 07:54 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
SUSAN RICE AND THE LATEST BOGUS ATTEMPT TO JUSTIFY TRUMP’S WIRETAPPING TWEET

Susan Rice and the Latest Bogus Attempt to Justify Trump’s Wiretapping Tweet - The New Yorker
From the New Yorker.

That is what most of us read to find out the current hem length.

The New Yorker - Wikipedia
  #13  
Old 04-05-2017, 01:07 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
From the New Yorker.

That is what most of us read to find out the current hem length.

The New Yorker - Wikipedia

  #14  
Old 04-05-2017, 01:46 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default That's Why they Call It investigating Reporting

Notice that progressives have the benefit of appearing on the friendly confines of CNN , MSNBC, NBC, CBS, SNL......where they are required only to be asked and respond to softball questions, such as :

susan, were you not an national security adviser to His Highness Barrack H Obama? Yes, I was.

There is a flagrant faux, false , fraudulent accusation that you spied on the Trump Transition team, unmasking transition team members . How would you answer to this ridiculous and slanderous charge by fabricators? Susan, simply respond with "True or not true" Oops, there it is, I can tell by the expression on your face that you are about to say "not true"

Now, it is our understanding that unmasking is the job of professional intelligence analysts and not White House officials. So because of Obama's great concern for the safety of this nation he allowed the free flow of highly intelligence gathering to be circulated widely among those in the intelligence community. and of course we know with a certainty that this information remained only in that circle, right? Just nod yes.

Ok, and you have told us that you believe there is a difference between unmasking and leaking to the press and that you never leaked nothing to nobody? I know you will agree that what we just explained is accurate and true. Just nod yes.

OK, that about wraps it up, thank you for this very in depth interview as you have cleaned the air of these preposterous allegations proving that you did not unmask anyone. We all know that this was an attempt by the Trump Administration to deflect from the ugly matter of his Russian connection and that we will not rest until we get to the bottom of this Russian scandal even if it takes us the 8 years that Trump will be in office.

Ok were off the air susan, susan you can take off the mask now.

Personal Best Regards:
  #15  
Old 04-05-2017, 02:12 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Notice that progressives have the benefit of appearing on the friendly confines of CNN , MSNBC, NBC, CBS, SNL......where they are required only to be asked and respond to softball questions, such as :

susan, were you not an national security adviser to His Highness Barrack H Obama? Yes, I was.

There is a flagrant faux, false , fraudulent accusation that you spied on the Trump Transition team, unmasking transition team members . How would you answer to this ridiculous and slanderous charge by fabricators? Susan, simply respond with "True or not true" Oops, there it is, I can tell by the expression on your face that you are about to say "not true"

Now, it is our understanding that unmasking is the job of professional intelligence analysts and not White House officials. So because of Obama's great concern for the safety of this nation he allowed the free flow of highly intelligence gathering to be circulated widely among those in the intelligence community. and of course we know with a certainty that this information remained only in that circle, right? Just nod yes.

Ok, and you have told us that you believe there is a difference between unmasking and leaking to the press and that you never leaked nothing to nobody? I know you will agree that what we just explained is accurate and true. Just nod yes.

OK, that about raps it up, thank you for this very in depth interview as you have cleaned the air of these preposterous allegations proving that you did not unmask anyone. We all know that this was an attempt by the Trump Administration to deflect from the ugly matter of his Russian connection and that we will not rest until we get to the bottom of this Russian scandal even if it takes us the 8 years that Trump will be in office.

Ok were off the air susan, susan you can take off the mask now.

Personal Best Regards:
"When one person makes an accusation, check to be sure he himself is not the guilty one. Sometimes it is those whose case is weak who make the most clamour. "

Piers Anthony
 

Tags
rice, leaked, question, banger, uneducated


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 AM.