Originally Posted by Guest

Unfortunately YOU LET it be a "two party system". How? You KEEP voting for one of their corrupt crooks. YOU keep the "two party system" going. Vote for somebody else...ANYBODY else. It's better than one of them.

Yes, make the HARD choice, vote outside the two main, corrupt, thieving, parties.

You still don't get it.

Originally Posted by Guest

The supreme court MUST stay balanced in my opinion in order to remain Constitutional.

Are you frigging serious?

You really think SCOTUS has been "balanced?"

The 'Citizens United' ruling will prove to be one of the biggest failures and threats to this country....in a very long time.

I've read a lot of wacky things here, but claiming the previous court was "balanced"...is one of the wackiest.





CNM

Originally Posted by Guest

Are you frigging serious?

You really think SCOTUS has been "balanced?"

The 'Citizens United' ruling will prove to be one of the biggest failures and threats to this country....in a very long time.

I've read a lot of wacky things here, but claiming the previous court was "balanced"...is one of the wackiest.





CNM

Legalized murder of babies is also one of the biggest failures of the Supreme Court.
ObamaCare is one of the biggest failures of the Supreme Court.
Failure to enforce voter ID IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, because there is a mandate in the Constitution that specifically states that all voters MUST be U.S. citizens. If no proof is presented, then they should not be allowed to vote.
There are many issues that Americans do not agree with. In your case, if you don't get your way, you stomp your feet and cry foul.

The Supreme court is supposed to rule on whether or not something is constitutional, period. Not make law.

Originally Posted by Guest

Legalized murder of babies is also one of the biggest failures of the Supreme Court.
ObamaCare is one of the biggest failures of the Supreme Court.
Failure to enforce voter ID IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, because there is a mandate in the Constitution that specifically states that all voters MUST be U.S. citizens. If no proof is presented, then they should not be allowed to vote.
There are many issues that Americans do not agree with. In your case, if you don't get your way, you stomp your feet and cry foul.

The Supreme court is supposed to rule on whether or not something is constitutional, period. Not make law.

Umm nice try, but you're the one "stomping your feet and crying foul."

As to your other assertions, they are subjects that are way too deep and complicated to try and argue on a thread about Chump...so why don't you start a thread on them specifically?

As I said, the last court was FAR from 'balanced.'





CNM

Originally Posted by Guest

Umm nice try, but you're the one "stomping your feet and crying foul."

As to your other assertions, they are subjects that are way too deep and complicated to try and argue on a thread about Chump...so why don't you start a thread on them specifically?

As I said, the last court was FAR from 'balanced.'





CNM

For once, you are correct. The last court was NOT balanced. It was liberal/left leaning on more issues than not. Still is. Another liberal on the court will make it totally left and make this country into a banana republic.

Originally Posted by Guest

I took your comment under advisement and concluded that you are very biased and lacking in balanced facts. You find deficiencies in Trump that seem trivial to Hillary's long term negative traits. You have not convinced me of a fair evaluation.



I have compared Trump's successes, minus his verbiage and concluded that he is gaming or playing the media. From all appearances, he is a total opposite of what people that know him say he is. Obviously he is successful. He is more old style Democrat than Republican.



On the other hand, I have examined Hillary's past statements compared to her present statements, and she seems to have made an amazing life change, or NOT. Her career record shows little if any success and more than resembles abject failure.



My children are Republicans and the rest of my family are Democrats, or were. I do not know of one family member that plans to vote for Hillary. Not one of them respects her. But we are mostly a loyal, patriotic military loyal family, that have been discouraged by her lack of support for law enforcement, wanting to cut the military, and she supports planned parenthood. Even though Democrats, we are ALL pro-life. We also want/need a balanced budget. That part is probably impossible today, but still on the wish list.



The balance of the Supreme Court is the most important issue of this election. Because of this, regardless of what we think of Donald, we have all decided to vote a straight Republican ticket this time around. The future is more important than rhetoric. The supreme court MUST stay balanced in my opinion in order to remain Constitutional.



We are disappointed in the Democratic party for moving to the left and embracing a socialist. Socialism has always been the enemy of our Democratic America.



After this election, we plan to change our affiliation to Independent. The Democratic party has left us behind.

At the end of the day, do you really want Trump to be our commander in chief ?
Not since Goldwater have we had such a juxtaposition of choice.
Hillary may be a corrupt tool but isn't corruption the grease that lubricates our political system ? I'm not up for a revolution just now. Let the millennials have their peace with that.
I'm voting democrat because the other option disgusts me, it truly does.

Originally Posted by RickeyD

At the end of the day, do you really want Trump to be our commander in chief ?
Not since Goldwater have we had such a juxtaposition of choice.
Hillary may be a corrupt tool but isn't corruption the grease that lubricates our political system ? I'm not up for a revolution just now. Let the millennials have their peace with that.
I'm voting democrat because the other option disgusts me, it truly does.

You know Michael Moore believes Trump will win because Democrats are too lazy to vote. Do you agree with him or do you think he is trying to scare people into voting?

Originally Posted by Guest

You know Michael Moore believes Trump will win because Democrats are too lazy to vote. Do you agree with him or do you think he is trying to scare people into voting?

Democrats weren't lazy in 2008. Don't know where he got that from. I liked him in Roger and me, but since then has gone off the deep end.

Originally Posted by RickeyD

Democrats weren't lazy in 2008. Don't know where he got that from. I liked him in Roger and me, but since then has gone off the deep end.

I hope you are right. I don't think it's a good idea to tell citizens that she has it locked up.

What about Brexit? http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...mp-white-house

Originally Posted by Guest

I hope you are right. I don't think it's a good idea to tell citizens that she has it locked up.



What about Brexit? Oddsmakers Say Chance of Second U.K. Brexit Referendum Similar to Trump White House - Bloomberg

Brexit was different. The Brits wanted full self determination. They knew what they had before brexit, they wanted it back.

Originally Posted by Guest

Ditto

RickeyD

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G530AZ using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by RickeyD

Brexit was different. The Brits wanted full self determination. They knew what they had before brexit, they wanted it back.

Maybe our liberals should learn a lesson from them.

Originally Posted by Guest

Maybe our liberals should learn a lesson from them.

Yes--That's Michael Moore's wake-up call. The assumption is that enough people will actually vote.