You can say whatever you want about Mitt Romney. In all probability there will be very little truth to it, nothing but spin. Regardless I will not vote for Barack Obama. Barack Obama has been a failure as president. He has been incompetent as a leader. He needs to be replaced. Mitt Romney is running against him for president. He will have my vote. The country will be a better place with him at the helm. Maybe not perfect but much better.

as head of Bain Capital he is very aware and familiar with the triage routine applied when taking over a company that is in trouble/distressed.

He will bring to the office of POTUS that experience and perhaps most importantly he will bring to the WH a staff and collection of aids from his business past. And like all good executives he will bring in people that compliment his strengths.......as opposed to politically motivated rewards to people who bring no business acumen to the table as in the current administration.

Yes he will find out there are things that just cannot be done so easily in the business as usual environment of the current WH and congress.

However, I look forward to him and his staff again employing those tactics used in fixing distressed companies of implementing what can be implemented to accomplish a task. Which is a very different skill set than Obama and his team which make use of rhetoric only.

His Washington inexperience is a definite plus.....he will not know why things CANNOT be changed, therefore increase the odds of at a minimum attempting to do so.

There just is no comparison between a politically motivated person, Obama and a business executive, Romney. Competent business executives do not subscribe to the status quo. Competent business executives will not let three and a half years go by with no change in things that are broken and not working, which the current business as usual defends.

btk

Given Obama's well publicized propensity to mis-inform leads one to believe that Obama's negative ad concerning Romney's Massachuetts experience was done with the same selectivity as other points of light/non he presents at the lectern. Massachusetts is deeply Democratic and many of Romney's policies/programs including RomneyCare were altered by the Dems.

Romney's style is not openly combative or argumentative. Some mistake that for a weakness but he is celebral and keeps his emotions in check and draws his appeal by responding factually and logically.

I believe there is a major difference between these two candidates ethically, intellectually, philosophically and experience-wise as respects the position being sought. Hands down Romney has advantage and Romney will deliver becuase his agenda represents what is best for America