Please fact check.

https://m.facebook.com/l.php?u=https...=dAQHdnJXQ&s=1

Yes time to fact check


The Clintons' Terror Pardons - WSJ


Hillary Rodham Clinton was in the midst of her state-wide "listening tour" in anticipation of her run for the U.S. Senate in New York, a state which included: 1.3 million Hispanics. Three members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus -- Luis V. Gutierrez (D., Ill.), Jose E. Serrano, (D., N.Y.) and Nydia M. Velazquez, (D., N.Y.) -- along with local Hispanic politicians and leftist human-rights advocates, had been agitating for years on behalf of the FALN cases directly to the White House and first lady.

Initial reports stated that Mrs. Clinton supported the clemencies, but when public reaction went negative she changed course, issuing a short statement three weeks after the clemencies were announced. The prisoners' delay in refusing to renounce violence "speaks volumes," she said.

The Clintons were caught in an awkward predicament of their own making. The president had ignored federal guidelines for commutation of sentences, including the most fundamental: The prisoners hadn't actually asked for clemency.

To push the deal through, signed statements renouncing violence and expressing remorse were required by the Justice Department. The FALN prisoners, surely relishing the embarrassment and discomfiture they were causing the president and his wife, had previously declined to accept these conditions. Committed and unrepentant militants who did not accept the authority of the United States, they refused to apologize for activities they were proud of in order to obtain a clemency they never requested.

So desperate was the White House to get the deal finalized and out of the news, an unprecedented 16-way conference call was set up for the "petitioners" who were locked up in 11 different federal facilities so that they could strategize a response to the president's offer. Two eventually refused to renounce their cause, preferring to serve out their lengthy sentences rather than follow the White House script.

Mr. Clinton's fecklessness in the handling of these cases was demonstrated by the fact that none of the prisoners were required, as a standard condition of release, to cooperate in ongoing investigations of countless unsolved FALN bombing cases and other crimes. Mrs. Clinton's so-called disagreement with her husband on the matter made no mention of that fact. The risk of demanding such a requirement, of course, was that the prisoners might have proudly implicated themselves, causing the entire enterprise to implode, with maximum damage to the president and potentially sinking Hillary Clinton's Senate chances.

Originally Posted by Guest

Yes time to fact check


The Clintons' Terror Pardons - WSJ


Hillary Rodham Clinton was in the midst of her state-wide "listening tour" in anticipation of her run for the U.S. Senate in New York, a state which included: 1.3 million Hispanics. Three members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus -- Luis V. Gutierrez (D., Ill.), Jose E. Serrano, (D., N.Y.) and Nydia M. Velazquez, (D., N.Y.) -- along with local Hispanic politicians and leftist human-rights advocates, had been agitating for years on behalf of the FALN cases directly to the White House and first lady.

Initial reports stated that Mrs. Clinton supported the clemencies, but when public reaction went negative she changed course, issuing a short statement three weeks after the clemencies were announced. The prisoners' delay in refusing to renounce violence "speaks volumes," she said.

The Clintons were caught in an awkward predicament of their own making. The president had ignored federal guidelines for commutation of sentences, including the most fundamental: The prisoners hadn't actually asked for clemency.

To push the deal through, signed statements renouncing violence and expressing remorse were required by the Justice Department. The FALN prisoners, surely relishing the embarrassment and discomfiture they were causing the president and his wife, had previously declined to accept these conditions. Committed and unrepentant militants who did not accept the authority of the United States, they refused to apologize for activities they were proud of in order to obtain a clemency they never requested.

So desperate was the White House to get the deal finalized and out of the news, an unprecedented 16-way conference call was set up for the "petitioners" who were locked up in 11 different federal facilities so that they could strategize a response to the president's offer. Two eventually refused to renounce their cause, preferring to serve out their lengthy sentences rather than follow the White House script.

Mr. Clinton's fecklessness in the handling of these cases was demonstrated by the fact that none of the prisoners were required, as a standard condition of release, to cooperate in ongoing investigations of countless unsolved FALN bombing cases and other crimes. Mrs. Clinton's so-called disagreement with her husband on the matter made no mention of that fact. The risk of demanding such a requirement, of course, was that the prisoners might have proudly implicated themselves, causing the entire enterprise to implode, with maximum damage to the president and potentially sinking Hillary Clinton's Senate chances.

Reasons not to vote for Trump:

1. Because he is wealthy? Nope, that's not a good reason
2. Because he speaks his mind? Sorry, but that does not bother me.
3. Because he has a comb over? That doesn't bother me
4. Because he is NOT a politician? Is that a bad thing?

Because he is a big meanie??? Nope, that wasn't fact checked, so that's not it. Sorry, I can find plenty of legitimate and fact checked reasons not to vote for Hillary, but none to keep me from voting for Trump.

Originally Posted by Guest

Reasons not to vote for Trump:

1. Because he is wealthy? Nope, that's not a good reason
2. Because he speaks his mind? Sorry, but that does not bother me.
3. Because he has a comb over? That doesn't bother me
4. Because he is NOT a politician? Is that a bad thing?

Because he is a big meanie??? Nope, that wasn't fact checked, so that's not it. Sorry, I can find plenty of legitimate and fact checked reasons not to vote for Hillary, but none to keep me from voting for Trump.

When a man who runs large corporations legally uses the court system to carry out his fiduciary duties he is mocked by liberals.

The liberals hold Trump personally accountable for every act of every employee that ever worked in every entity he was ever associated with.

Hillarys fiduciary duty was to the people and she failed horribly countless times.

Please..please..fact check!

Originally Posted by Guest

When a man who runs large corporations legally uses the court system to carry out his fiduciary duties he is mocked by liberals.

The liberals hold Trump personally accountable for every act of every employee that ever worked in every entity he was ever associated with.

Hillarys fiduciary duty was to the people and she failed horribly countless times.

To liberals, facts mean nothing and the ends justify the means.

Liberals are mostly minorities, women, and gays, all actually inferior to white men. They hate being "screwed" by chance of birth and want revenge. Their rage is manifest in how difficult they try to make our lives. White men are the only class it's LEGAL to discriminate against. (Asian men in education too) Quotas are discrimination against white men because it's OUR position, our slot, that was taken away.

The country is going down hill because the best are being denied access and the mediocre are running things. Government is FULL of under performing minorities and women.