Originally Posted by The Villager II

Hey Richie, when we get over 2000 posts maybe we will get better at insults in a more sophisticated way like you do. LOL

Maybe; I got time to wait and see

Originally Posted by ladydoc

Anything Anne Coulter writes winds up wrapping fish.....

Anne Coulter is one very smart lady and I am glad she is "right-thinking"

Besides, anybody who lines their birdcages with The New York Times, can't be all that bad.

Originally Posted by KatzPajamas

Here is just one man speaking out and explaining why the myth of global warming continues http://www.examiner.com/seminole-cou...rming-doctrine

"Examiner.com: If your theory stands up to scientific scrutiny, it would collapse the CO2 global warming doctrine and render meaningless its predictions of climate catastrophe. Given its significance, why has your theory been met with silence and, in some instances, dismissal and derision?
Dr. Miskolczi: I can only guess. First of all, nobody likes to admit mistakes. Second, somebody has to explain to the taxpayers why millions of dollars were spent on AGW research. Third, some people are making a lot of money from the carbon trade and energy taxes.

Examiner.com: A huge industry has arisen out of the study and prevention of man-made global warming. Has the world been fooled?
Dr. Miskolczi: Thanks to censored science and the complicity of the mainstream media, yes, totally."

Katz, thanks for the link. Of course there are cognizant arguments and theories that support both sides of the debate on global warming. And since we're not scientists, all we can do is believe the information provided by experts. which supports both sides of the argument. We see pictures of bewildered polar bears and experience violent climate changes, and we want to place blame. I believe a lot of points made by Dr. Miskolczi.

Originally Posted by billethkid

The forum is starting to very much look and "sound" like the pre election year 2008!!!

btk

I am probably going to spend very little time here once the election crap starts. I hate watching the talking heads on tv talking over each other so you can'g hear either one of them. I only watch the debates...the rest is pure rhetoric to me. They will say what each particular audience wants to hear. I wonder if anyone will wear the kind of backpack Bush did during the debates?

I really think that Perry is just stupid,Coulture on the other hand is smart,dangerous but smart.

Originally Posted by ladydoc

I am probably going to spend very little time here once the election crap starts. I hate watching the talking heads on tv talking over each other so you can'g hear either one of them. I only watch the debates...the rest is pure rhetoric to me. They will say what each particular audience wants to hear. I wonder if anyone will wear the kind of backpack Bush did during the debates?

Could you please tell me what this means? I do not understand.

Originally Posted by waynet

I really think that Perry is just stupid,Coulture on the other hand is smart,dangerous but smart.

Could you expand on why and who she is dangerous towards.

Originally Posted by waynet

I really think that Perry is just stupid,Coulture on the other hand is smart,dangerous but smart.

Very right on both counts.

Forget evolution..
Perry supported Hillarycare and wanted it to include texans..
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...7775S720110810

http://forums.hannity.com/attachment...1&d=1314640658

Go away rino.

Originally Posted by villagegolfer

Could you expand on why and who she is dangerous towards.

She's dangerous because she exposes the hypocrisy of, and the agenda of the leftists in a concise and humorous way. She's dangerous to the leftists domination of the discussion.

Originally Posted by JimJoe

Forget evolution..
Perry supported Hillarycare and wanted it to include texans..
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...7775S720110810

http://forums.hannity.com/attachment...1&d=1314640658

Go away rino.

Reagan was an Democrat and a union member in his past. Was he a RINO?

People's views change with new realities. Keep an open mind and you're going to be surprised by what you see and hear in the coming months.

I still say Forrest Gump would make a much better President then Barry Seotoro. (Barack Hussein Obama)

I was not talking about his political affiliations..
I was talking about his core beliefs..
Hillarycare.. big government healthcare mandate.
Gardasil; Big government making healthcare decisions for children
etc..
He has many examples of being a big government supporter..
Did he have the guts to turn down any stimulus spending like others did?

Originally Posted by RichieLion

Reagan was an Democrat and a union member in his past. Was he a RINO?

People's views change with new realities. Keep an open mind and you're going to be surprised by what you see and hear in the coming months.

I mean if you disagree with Rick Perry's point of view then a cogent rebuttal is in order instead of calling him names.

Ann Coulter is bright, well researched and and one heck of a wordsmith leaving her liberal opponents tongue tied.

I don't agree that in made man global waming as one poster aptly pointed out the sun trumps it all.

I also agree with coulter premise concerning Darwin and his reaction to today's discoveries. I mean look what it took just to convince people that the earth was flat. More importantly to me there are aprrox 1.5 to 2million species of identified so far on earth but scientist know that between 5-7 million more have not been discovered. What do you think this fact does to the theory of evolution? Finally of evolution is the process then why do we have monkeys and humans and nothing in between or after?

Originally Posted by rubicon

I mean if you disagree with Rick Perry's point of view then a cogent rebuttal is in order instead of calling him names.

Ann Coulter is bright, well researched and and one heck of a wordsmith leaving her liberal opponents tongue tied.

I don't agree that in made man global waming as one poster aptly pointed out the sun trumps it all.

I also agree with coulter premise concerning Darwin and his reaction to today's discoveries. I mean look what it took just to convince people that the earth was flat. More importantly to me there are aprrox 1.5 to 2million species of identified so far on earth but scientist know that between 5-7 million more have not been discovered. What do you think this fact does to the theory of evolution? Finally of evolution is the process then why do we have monkeys and humans and nothing in between or after?

Man did not evolve from directly from monkeys. There was a common ancestor...but they are two branches of the tree. There is a close relationship though. Man and chimps share about 97% of chromosomes. If you really want to learn about this, read a book on evolution. Even if you disagree...educate yourself on the science.