Swing states much worse under Obama

 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 09-19-2016, 06:47 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
We all know anybody can find any chart they want to suit thier agenda.

We also know that every time a dem shoots and arrow it always hits the bullseye....which is amazing......UNTIL.......

we discovered they were shooting the arrow and then painting the bullseye around the arrow and then taking a bow!!!!!!!
How can you find any chart you want? Find a chart that says in the US, 75% of the population are men.

If you see a chart from a source that is of questionable authority on either side it is disregarded.
  #17  
Old 09-19-2016, 06:49 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
I Helped frame your question correctly.

1. The stock market almost tripled.
https://finance.yahoo.com/chart/%5ED...ZSI6IjF5In0%3D

2. Median income up 5.2%
Median income jumps 5.2% in 2015 - Sep. 13, 2016

Note what it was doing in The Simpleton's last years.
The Villages Florida

3. 17 million American citizens now have health coverage.
17 million gained coverage under ObamaCare, study finds | TheHill

4. Wall Street reforms made our financial system safer, so as to avoid another 'great Recession.'
Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Glad I could help.



That's because you are probably pi$$ed...that it took a black POTUS to save this country.





CNM
Great charts for sepicting the or a status.

However these are status of select measures at select points in time only.

None of the measurements represent what Obama did or did not do to make any of the measures (good or bad) come to pass.

Yes we do acknowledge they did in fact happen on his watch.

We also know there are just as many unfavorable charts of status for the same time period that can be added.
  #18  
Old 09-19-2016, 06:50 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Great charts for sepicting the or a status.

However these are status of select measures at select points in time only.

None of the measurements represent what Obama did or did not do to make any of the measures (good or bad) come to pass.

Yes we do acknowledge they did in fact happen on his watch.

We also know there are just as many unfavorable charts of status for the same time period that can be added.
depicting................
  #19  
Old 09-19-2016, 07:12 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Here's a challenge for ya. Can someone name something that most people could agree on that one could say:
"Wow, ___________________ is so much better since Obama became president"

Just curious, I can't off the top of my head name anything.
Under Obama care I was able to keep my doctor and my family saved over $2,500/year. NOT! LOL
  #20  
Old 09-19-2016, 07:57 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Stocks high as interest rates kept artificially low for many years, consequences to follow. Poorest 50% of population own no stock.
Household incomes high due to adult children moving in with mommy.
Obama care about to implode November 1st, just in time for election.

Obama horrific racist, even worse president.
  #21  
Old 09-19-2016, 08:00 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Household incomes high due to adult children moving in with mommy.
How do you think they calculate household income?
  #22  
Old 09-19-2016, 08:27 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default Swing states much worse under Obama

Interesting, seeing all but 4 of those states you list are in complete control of Republicans.
Wis./ Col./ Ohio/ Mich./ Fla./ N.C. / AZ./ GA./ Na. all ahve Republican leg, and Gov.
N.H. / PA./ VA/ Iowa all have split control of their state governments
don't State Legislatures and Governors have a little bit to do with all this?
one more thing you might want to look into
the " Red " states also get more help from the Federal Gov. then the Blue states do

Red states more dependent on federal government - Business Insider
  #23  
Old 09-19-2016, 09:02 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Is there a pattern evolving here?

In the face of facts from credible resources, our usual partisan dems are not heard from.

I accept silence as agreement!!
Don't worry, Don the Con will give all those people tax cuts and bring back jobs.
  #24  
Old 09-19-2016, 09:24 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Interesting, seeing all but 4 of those states you list are in complete control of Republicans.

Wis./ Col./ Ohio/ Mich./ Fla./ N.C. / AZ./ GA./ Na. all have Republican leg, and Gov.

N.H. / PA./ VA/ Iowa all have split control of their state governments don't State Legislatures and Governors have a little bit to do with all this?

One more thing you might want to look into the " Red " states also get more help from the Federal Gov. then the Blue states do

Red states more dependent on federal government - Business Insider
OUCH...that's gonna leave a large bruise.




CNM
  #25  
Old 09-19-2016, 09:31 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And run the debt up some more
Wonder if he will be like Reagan and W and run the debt up more then all their predecessors combined. ( Reagan took it from 998 Billion to 2.6 Trillion and W took it from 5.8 Trillion to 11.6 Trillion.)
They say Obama did , But wouldn't the debt have to be over 22 Trillion if he did?
He came into off ice with a debt of ( depending where you look ) 10.6 to 11.6 Trillion
even at 10.6 that would mean Obama would have to increase it to 21.2 Trillion
  #26  
Old 09-20-2016, 06:28 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
And run the debt up some more
Wonder if he will be like Reagan and W and run the debt up more then all their predecessors combined. ( Reagan took it from 998 Billion to 2.6 Trillion and W took it from 5.8 Trillion to 11.6 Trillion.)
They say Obama did , But wouldn't the debt have to be over 22 Trillion if he did?
He came into off ice with a debt of ( depending where you look ) 10.6 to 11.6 Trillion
even at 10.6 that would mean Obama would have to increase it to 21.2 Trillion
Today's National Debt is:
$19.5+ Trillion with a year to go in the fiscal accounting.

Debt held by PUBLIC 30 Sep 2009= $7,551,861,558,736.77
Public Debt today = $14,134,070,557,269.95 - almost double.

And we still have a year to go. So, the public debt has almost doubled and will exceed double in a couple months.

Any way you look at it, this administration has failed to curb spending as it had promised. Obama has doubled the national debt in his tenure and in order for President Trump to double it, he would have to increase spending by $20 Trillion bucks. Impossible.

But, once again the thread has been diverted from the subject. Liberals always find it convenient to avoid the subject by changing the conversation to suit themselves. They do not start a thread with a news article. They only know how troll.

Try this, start a thread with a news article instead of a statement like "Hillary is going to win" or "Trump sucks." If not, then try to stay on the subject of the discussion.
 

Tags
states, obama, worse, swing


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 PM.