You or someone else challenged me . And here is another one for you . When your girl was a US Senator I dealt directly with her and her assistants several times a year .

One particular year when I attended the major annual dinners in Washington as the guest of one of Mr. Buffet`s companies [ not the one I worked for ] your girl left the Dias when she spotted me and sat down in between courses and chatted me up for a while .
The more I saw of the inner workings of her office and her the lower my opinion .

A piece of advice I fear you will not heed.....

The MORE you speak of yourself or shroud everything in "you", the LESS people listen.

Don`t listen or read . The fact is I only speak about my history in
100% true facts . I had a very interesting and long career .

Began as a Trainee out of my Undergrad days and worked my way up to very near the very top .

You and others call me out and then I have responded with the truth which you apparently do not like hearing about .
And besides why should I care what you and others on this site may think about me . You`re not writing me a paycheck and you are not my friend .
You and your crowd are just determined to finish off this Nation. I have no idea what you motives might be but I could never understand your rationale either .

I do not call you out. I am here by hapinstance. I am trying to get some things done and was distracted by someone defending Donald Trump.

What I have noticed is that you simply ignore and do not respond when called on your errors. I also notice you make statements that are false..ie., saying the President must establish a blind trust...and most of those incorrect statements are preceded by you loudly patting yourself on the back.

I have met a lot of folks who insist they are ALWAYS correct, and baffle with BS by trying to dazzle with degrees, accomplishments, associates, etc.

None of this folks impressed me because most have a NEED to give their resume. I prefer to talk to people who still are learning, do not profess themselves, are willing to learn whether they be truck drivers, landscapers, servers, VP of companies, etc.

Everyone who posts here has credentials of some sort. Perhaps if you respected that, and posted without your inordinate and usual need to impress. Read and learn....respect yourself, but also respect those to whom you speak.

Trust me, especially on this particular forum....nobody cares about your education or past accomplishments. You are wasting your time bragging in here.

I just need to insure you know I will not be responding on here because it is fruitless. It serves a purpose but not for me. People, I don't think make fun of you...they instead do not care what you think of yourself.

To quote your hero in speaking to blacks over the heads of an all white audience...."what the hell do you have to lose"....try listening instead of lecturing.

1] I have no need to impress .
2] I do not come out and brag on this site
3] If you look back someone tried to insult me by saying in effect oh I suppose that you know Buffet . Well guess what I did .
So should I just ignore them and go away and suck my thumb or should I call them out .
4] I do not need to be lectured by you any more than you need to be lectured by me .
5] I may stand corrected on the " Blind Trust " issue however as I recall it has been the practice of each and every newly elected president sine Eisenhower .

Your posts are so easy to pick out, as they are written with intelligence and common sense beyond what is predominately seen in this forum from the 'rabid right.' :thumbup:

And no, I'm not saying everyone on the right is 'rabid'...just that it's easy to see which ones are.

While I will be voting for Clinton, I completely understand (and respect) your unwillingness to do so...as she is far from ideal.

Due to the current political party makeup however, if I chose not to vote for her I am scared chitless that Trump might actually win...which is something I couldn't live with myself should that happen.

Until such time as a true Centrist (economically a little right of center, socially a little to the left) becomes viable, I will pull the lever for Hillary while holding my nose.

I'm also impressed with the fact that you don't feel the need to try and impress others with your personal/educational/professional accomplishments as so many others and are willing to call out those who do...for the insecure people that they are.

I've been falsely accused of being multiple people in this political forum, but you are one of the few that being confused with...I actually feel is a compliment. :D


G'day. :ho:



:wave:

CNM

Speak for yourself. If you don't like what someone writes, dispute it with facts, not your personal opinion of the poster. When you make comments like this, all you are doing is proving that you have no dispute with what they say, only that you don't like it. Not much different than calling names.

We are not going to have to worry about this, as she is not going to win the election. This is going to be one of those rare cases where polls will not be accurate in predicting the outcome of the election.

Points:

Polls are taken via telephone calls to those at home about who they might vote for.

Hillary had a 20% reduction in voter turnout in the primary.
Trump had a 50-60% increase in voter turnout.

Hillary has had a one or two hundred audience participation at her rallies.
Trump has had thousands attending his rallies

Republican voter registration has increased substantially this year.

Summary:

Polls are taken at home and reflect a democrat preference for Hillary. No surprise. However, with the actually participation rate being so low, you can expect a poor performance at the voter booths on election day for Democrats. Blacks turned out in force for Obama but are not likely to show Hillary the same amount of support. They know a lying con person when they see one. Democrats had less than 75% the total votes of Republicans in the primaries.

On the other hand, even with low polling Trump has caused a larger Republican voter turn out and a significant increase in Republican voter registration. Trump has thousands of rally attendees, showing an active participation rate for Republican voters.

These factors are predictors for the coming election. Trump is likely to win by a large margin (land slide).

There is such a fear among law and order voters of liberal media pollsters that the Bradley effect is in effect even in telephone polls. Most Americans do not publicly pledge their allegiance to trump, look at all the thugs that spit on them without repercussion.

Liberals can only have wet dreams and think the polls are accurate.

Add to that all the additional damning information yet to be released on clinton and her pending seizures.

Nope there's only one of you, a good thing :clap2:

well there is always..
 

We can beat Hillary's e-mail to DEATH. EVERY ONE has been checking the e-mail forever and NO ONE cares except Republicans, because that's all they got!

You just keep feeding yourself that partisan line of BS.

Totally ignoring the real issues of the overall circumstance.

We understand some are not allowed to go beyond that which the party dictates, and the positions you are obligated to to take......whether truthful or factual being completely ignored.

this is working its way to RICCO charges, so if you don't understand what went on get informed before

Hopefully! There just has to be some vestige of hope that some where in the system there is a recognition that something has been done that something illegal was done, knowingly or otherwise.

Even if it winds up being excused in what ever form it manifests itself.

The fact of the laws being violated need to be recognized at some point.

The Clinton supporters do not care since all that matters to them is party first....no matter who or what.

THE EXACT SAME SCRUTINY needs to be applied to Donald J Trump and as the new information (overshadowed by the Clinton stuff) comes out (see the new Wash Post BOOK). I suspect that you will be hearing much of the same.

Point is....Trump versus Clinton....both should be arrested now.

Replacement candidates so we can actually discuss issues.

My bet is that if anyone is charged, it will be Trump well before Clinton. We have not even scratched the surface with him.

Sorry...thought this dang thread was about Trumps secret and HUGE debt to China, Russia and the like. Imagine, a President PERSONALLY indebted to those countries in the millions ??? WOW

But sorry,...here I thought that was what this was about...silly me.

Carry on...they are both crooks and if your political party demands you attack one or the other, then lets at least stay on point within a thread