You know all those dead people voted for Gore. Dead voters are a solid Democrat constituency.

Anyway, Gore appeals to the dead voter; he looks amazingly similar to them.

Dont know if you were here in 2000 or not, but it was actually funny watching the Democratic party, and actually the Republican party as well, but ESPECIALLY the Democratic party specifically in the Miami area. Some of the claims, etc were so "out there", some of the liberal press was making fun.

This country needs a purge and then a national voter id. It solves and addresses the issue spot on. And I have been asking those who ask that ridiculous question about how many cases, etc...what is your number of cases that is ok..mine is ZERO or ONE. There are reports of fraud every election in just about every precinct in the nation and as always, the liberal side will create another problem because folks will get sick of that question an begin to fully prosecute every claim and then they will scream....well lots of things...mainly call whomever a racist !

Why the issue with the Democrats is not HOW it is done but the fact that they dont want it done is a real sticking point with me. It just makes no common sense whatsoever.

Your number of cases is ZERO or ONE. What's the acceptable number of cases of eligible voters who should be purged? I agree with you, for once, on the need for a national voter ID, however I doubt that a plan could be implemented before Nov 2012.

Attorney General Pam Bondi promises Florida will 'keep fighting' for voter purge and insures that the proper people will vote. Some might misinterpret what her remarks mean.

How many groups of people can republicans alienate in one day? Today the Republican Senators voted against the Paycheck Fairness Act. That will make for some good campaign fodder. Where is the Republican big tent when Hispanics, African Americans, women, Gays and Lesbians are excluded?


http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.co...-keep-fighting

[QUOTE=RichieLion;501813]

Anyway, Gore appeals to the dead voter; he looks amazingly similar to them.[/QUOTE

You know, as much as I would like to argue about it, I can't find anything that is flawed in your statement. :wave:

As far as I can tell this "purge" has thus far found zero voter fraud and taken the vote away from 5 documented citizens. Nice job so far. Yet even with these mistakes the governor refuses to halt this sham. I wonder why.

It's not that they don't want it.they don't want it before this election they will allow after nov.election's .And to say no fraud is just stupid.Every election you see in news people who didn't vote but voter rolls show someone did.Now how would you prosecute when you don't know who did.If the left really cared they would support a national id but no one here has.Instead just say prove it.Think they are afraid they would get clock cleaned in a fair election.

As of today here is what election officials have found. There have been 13 people purged and 2 might have voted.

Do you realize what a monumental task it would be to make sure every American citizen was eligible to vote and had a government issued voter ID? Why didn't you start squawking about it in 2008 and perhaps it could have been done as part of the US Census in 2010.

BTW: I've been looking all over for those cases you mentioned in FT Myers. I assume you meant FT Myers, FL and not FT Meyers as you stated. I would like to research the cases for my upcoming book on voter fraud. Can you post a link?

In actual cases, the voter id thing began back in 2003...I think there 5 states that passed some sort of law at that time and the march continues. The Democratic party continues to spend money to upend as many as possible and there are a few up in state supreme courts.

This is a state issue...now the purging is a FEDERAL law that states must do but the DOJ, for some reason keeps stepping to make sure it does not happen. It is a federal law simply because we have so very man illegal folks here and most recognize how dangerous this is becoming.

When The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed, it was more of a civil rights issue than an immigration issue. Some states, such as Florida, have a stricter mandate because of past indiscretions.

it can't be that big a deal if every american citizen gets a birth certificate, social security number, and those who elect to get a driver's license.

we're americans! no challenge is too big!

is it, janmcn?

We are talking about VOTER ID here !!! It is a state issue,not fed. The federal laws says they must purge

This has NOTHING to do with anyones civil rights unless someone is stricken, not allowed to vote without recourse.

Of course my civil rights are violated if ONE illegal votes !!!

What federal law says they must purge? The Voter Registration Act of 1993 says states may not purge their rolls 90 days before an election. The Florida primary is August 14, 2012. You do the math.

Would your civil rights be violated if registered voters are not allowed to vote?

How many elderly African-American citizens have no birth certificate because they were not allowed to be born in a hospital before the Civil Rights Act passed in 1965? What would you suggest they do?

Well, not my conversation but I know the HAVA act requires that each state is required to maintain the statewide list and to remove any ineligible voters. That goes back to maybe 2001/2002.

Which is what Florida was trying to do in a reasonable manner asking the Federal government for listings that the fed said was available, HOWEVER the Fed (DOJ) resisited and did not thus the state began the mandated purge with what they had(NOT in secret by the way) and of course the DOJ and Fed actions put them up against that 90 day problem.

AGain, WHY are not you folks who are yelling so loud be yelling that you want to be involved in the purging as REQUIRED BY LAW. But recently the DOJ and the Fed wants to get involved in all the states trying to administer the FED law...go figure !