Originally Posted by Guest

Wrong. It's been proven that there were WMD's in Iraq. Mass graves are proof, and I was in Baghdad when they uncovered the graves. Victims were murdered by poison gas, a WMD.

Besides, Bush had a right and a mandate to attack when Sadaam refused to obey the No Fly Zone. So, get over it. Your problem is that you have no excuse for the poor performance of your messiah in D.C. By the way, does that make you Muslim?....

Dear Guest: Twice in the WSJ over the past ten years a columnist has mentioned that on a particular night before the American advance Iraqi Republican guards replaced Syrian guards along a section of its border. The implication was that Saddam moved his WMD to Syria. It is conceivable because a small measure of WMD goes a long way.

I believe what one can say about this issue is not that no WMD were found. Today Syria has secret locations for many of its chemical and biological weapons Iraq was successful in bury their airplanes under the sands in the desert.

Its obvious that the progressives hate for George W. Bush will perpetuate their claim with an assist from the main street media that there were no WMD so Bush lied and men died.

I agree with you. I also respect the manner, style and grace in which George W Bush has handled his detractors. He is to be applauded for taking the high ground.

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

Dear Guest: Twice in the WSJ over the past ten years a columnist has mentioned that on a particular night before the American advance Iraqi Republican guards replaced Syrian guards along a section of its border. The implication was that Saddam moved his WMD to Syria. It is conceivable because a small measure of WMD goes a long way.

I believe what one can say about this issue is not that no WMD were found. Today Syria has secret locations for many of its chemical and biological weapons Iraq was successful in bury their airplanes under the sands in the desert.

Its obvious that the progressives hate for George W. Bush will perpetuate their claim with an assist from the main street media that there were no WMD so Bush lied and men died.

I agree with you. I also respect the manner, style and grace in which George W Bush has handled his detractors. He is to be applauded for taking the high ground.

Personal Best Regards:

Friend,
Your tin foil hat needs re-crimping! What a crock of baloney!

Originally Posted by Guest

Friend,
Your tin foil hat needs re-crimping! What a crock of baloney!

Indulge me to defend the poster's position:

Do you agree with the following:

1) Hussein was a megalomaniac dictator
2) He had WMDs---he used them on the Kurds and possible Iranian troops
3) What megalomaniac has the power of WMDs and gives it up voluntarily
4) If he no longer had WMDs, why evade UN inspection?
5) What was the Iraqi general referring to on the cell intercept when he warned another general the UN is coming, better move "the stuff"--twinkies?
6) They're still digging up "stuff" from the Iraqi desert from 5000 years ago
7) Hussein went undiscovered in a hole in the ground for 9 months, and he needed air, water, food, "potty", and the people to bring it on a regular basis, a cache of "stuff" needs nothing
8) Any WMD could easily have been moved to Syria, just as it could be moved to avoid UN inspection--don't you think Assad would gladly accept it?

I don't know if he moved anything to Syria, but there is enough information above to support the poster's opinion without calling for a "tin foil hat". But then again, that is the game plan of the left---if you can't win an argument on facts and logic (which you never can), just call the person names, like a third grader.

Originally Posted by Guest

BS!

If you disagree, then provide some evidence that I am lying. Otherwise, go away. But, with you liberals you can't debate, just divert or protest in ignorance. Facts elude you, facts stump you, and facts cause your eyes to bleed and heads to explode. You liberals insist of facts, and yet you run and hide when they are provided. That will be Hilary's downfall too......IF she isn't thrown in jail where she belongs first.

[QUOTE=Guest;1138648]If you disagree, then provide some evidence that I am lying. Otherwise, go away. But, with you liberals you can't debate, just divert or protest in ignorance. Facts elude you, facts stump you, and facts cause your eyes to bleed and heads to explode. You liberals insist of facts, and yet you run and hide when they are provided. That will be Hilary's downfall too......IF she isn't thrown in jail where she belongs first.[

----

[COLOR="rgb(139, 0, 0)"]MORE BS![/COLOR]

[QUOTE=Guest;1138681]

Originally Posted by Guest

If you disagree, then provide some evidence that I am lying. Otherwise, go away. But, with you liberals you can't debate, just divert or protest in ignorance. Facts elude you, facts stump you, and facts cause your eyes to bleed and heads to explode. You liberals insist of facts, and yet you run and hide when they are provided. That will be Hilary's downfall too......IF she isn't thrown in jail where she belongs first.[

----

[COLOR="rgb(139, 0, 0)"]MORE BS![/COLOR]

Did someone's monkey get loose?