Originally Posted by Guest

Posts 58 and 59 were posted 3 minutes apart at 4:43 and 4:46 a.m.

What is the possibility that we have an early rising loon writing to himself - and we know exactly who he is?

58 addresses one post,
59 addresses a different post----
How can you conclude the person is talking to themselves?

And just because he or she is up at that hour what difference does that make?
Maybe they are taking care of someone who is ill?

I don't know who it is so who are you including in we.

Originally Posted by Guest

58 addresses one post,
59 addresses a different post----
How can you conclude the person is talking to themselves?

And just because he or she is up at that hour what difference does that make?
Maybe they are taking care of someone who is ill?

I don't know who it is so who are you including in we.

The WE that he is including himself in, is Sybil the multi-personas liberal on here that trolls consistently, rather than addressing the subject. He is guilty, as pointed out many times of agreeing with and responding to his own posts because many times, no one else will take his bait. Pitiful little fella, that even takes on a female persona when his responses are questioned. Not that it is important, just an observation. He tries to accuse others of doing the same thing that he does because he can't understand why there isn't anyone else that will applaud his half attempt at wit.
;;;;;;;;;;;

Sybil, for your edification, I was the one that replied to both of those posts.....different posts, neither being authored by myself. And the reason, if any of your business for me being up early is that I am an early riser, and because I also tend to our pets. Not that my quantity of sleep should concern you. I have always been an early riser.

If you feel the need for any further personal information, just take some more wild guesses and fill in the blanks. What you believe or not is of little interest to me.

Originally Posted by Guest

The WE that he is including himself in, is Sybil the multi-personas liberal on here that trolls consistently, rather than addressing the subject. He is guilty, as pointed out many times of agreeing with and responding to his own posts because many times, no one else will take his bait. Pitiful little fella, that even takes on a female persona when his responses are questioned. Not that it is important, just an observation. He tries to accuse others of doing the same thing that he does because he can't understand why there isn't anyone else that will applaud his half attempt at wit.
;;;;;;;;;;;

Sybil, for your edification, I was the one that replied to both of those posts.....different posts, neither being authored by myself. And the reason, if any of your business for me being up early is that I am an early riser, and because I also tend to our pets. Not that my quantity of sleep should concern you. I have always been an early riser.

If you feel the need for any further personal information, just take some more wild guesses and fill in the blanks. What you believe or not is of little interest to me.

You totally lost me.
I'm the guy you think has a multiple personality disorder.

I was defending someone's right to post anytime of the day and giving a logical reason why someone could answer 2 posts in a row a couple of minutes apart and not be talking to themselves.

Tell me the posts that you think I made and I'll tell you if it's me or not. Why in the world would I lie? I'm going on a bike ride and will check in later. TOTV is what I do when I'm bored.

Originally Posted by Guest

You totally lost me.
I'm the guy you think has a multiple personality disorder.

I was defending someone's right to post anytime of the day and giving a logical reason why someone could answer 2 posts in a row a couple of minutes apart and not be talking to themselves.

Tell me the posts that you think I made and I'll tell you if it's me or not. Why in the world would I lie? I'm going on a bike ride and will check in later. TOTV is what I do when I'm bored.

First off, I responded to you in the first part of the post. Then I used a post divider to reply to Sybil the liberal in the second half of the post. If you were confused, then I will take the blame for that confusion. But, I think that now that I explained my intention, you can go back and read my post and see that I had no intention of disparaging you. At any rate, my bad.

Originally Posted by Guest

First off, I responded to you in the first part of the post. Then I used a post divider to reply to Sybil the liberal in the second half of the post. If you were confused, then I will take the blame for that confusion. But, I think that now that I explained my intention, you can go back and read my post and see that I had no intention of disparaging you. At any rate, my bad.

Still lost.
I am the one you are maliciously and falsely claiming has a multiple personality disorder.

I assume that you replied to post #60, with yours #61.. If you read post #62, that was my post referencing what you replied to when you replied to post #60. I assume that post #60 was not you, or you would have been responding to yourself. The first half of my post was to you, not the second part. The second part was directed toward the one that you responded to. I did use some characters to separate the two parts. Got it? The second part was not directed at you.

Originally Posted by Guest

I assume that you replied to post #60, with yours #61.. If you read post #62, that was my post referencing what you replied to when you replied to post #60. I assume that post #60 was not you, or you would have been responding to yourself. The first half of my post was to you, not the second part. The second part was directed toward the one that you responded to. I did use some characters to separate the two parts. Got it? The second part was not directed at you.

This is beginning to sound like an Abbot and Costello bit.

Originally Posted by Guest

A business owner should choose whom he will and won't do business with. It's not up to you to decide. Find someone who will do business with you. If you can't, well, maybe the problem IS you. Unless they're doing VERY well, no business is going to turn away business unless it's important enough to them.

With that type of thinking, the business owner could refuse to serve anyone. Like it was before 1964. You must have loved South Africa during apartied.

Originally Posted by Guest

That's great, the first step to recovery....admitting that you have an illness.

Nah...they took it out the DSM years ago!

You must have missed that...you might also have missed that the CONSERVATIVE Supreme Court granted us the right to marry!

I married my partner on our 27th anniversary.

Get over it.....the 1950's are long gone!!!!

Originally Posted by Guest

If that's what they decide, yes. Why not? Why do you think you have a right to force someone to do business with you? They don't have the right to force you to do business with them.

Don't like it? Open your own restaurant, hotel, or store. YOU go through the risk and hassles of owning a business if you don't like how they run it. I bet the "white only" store does better than the "diversified" store. Thefts alone would make a difference. What neighborhoods businesses are more successful? White? Or black? It's a no-brainer that a business would prefer white only. Blacks are equal right? The government will give them a SBL to get started. So why don't they succeed?

I'm a libertarian at heart. I believe I should control my own life and as long as I don't bother others, I should be free to make my own decisions, my own choices. I also believe you live with your choices. Your neighbors decide what kind of a person you are and what they'll tolerate.

So perhaps you didn't read or take in the post on "Public Accommodation? If you are open to the PUBLIC you can't refuse service!

Originally Posted by Guest

If you're religious, you've been brainwashed. I mean really, God watches over everything and knows everything...about us? Really?

If anything, we're his dissertation on infectious lifeforms on otherwise pristine planets.

Based on my many hours of reading the posts on this area of TOV I have concluded that it is Hillary , Bill and the current guy who are Omnipotent and always watching over us .

Isn`t that how it works . Elect a Dem as President and " all will be OK Johnny and Mary ".

Originally Posted by Guest

With that type of thinking, the business owner could refuse to serve anyone. Like it was before 1964. You must have loved South Africa during apartied.

Yes and yes.

A business SHOULD be able to refuse service to anyone he pleases. Why would he unless for a good reason? It hits his bottom line. But in the long run, maybe it IS in his best interest because of less problem customers. If YOU have a choice in which business to use, shouldn't the business also have a choice in it's customer?

I guess you don't know much about South Africa. It was a MUCH better place then than now.

Is This The End of South Africa? | The Truth About South Africa
70,000 Whites Murdered in
https://africacheck.org/reports/is-s...facebook-post/

Originally Posted by Guest

Nah...they took it out the DSM years ago!

You must have missed that...you might also have missed that the CONSERVATIVE Supreme Court granted us the right to marry!

I married my partner on our 27th anniversary.

Get over it.....the 1950's are long gone!!!!

Took it out for political reasons. No "discovery", no reason other than pressure. Blackmail is my guess.

The 50s was the peak for this nation morally and socially. We've been on a steady slide towards 3rd worldism since. Minority children are the next baby boom, they'll change everything as the baby boomers did, NOT for the better...believe me.

And the whole "gay thing". You have a same sex fetish. Unfortunately, you suffered a developmental birth defect. I'm sorry. I'll never condone your deviance. I find the thought of same sex sex revolting. But you have to keep throwing it in my face. We'll all be dead in another 30 years, you've brainwashed the kids to accept all kinds of "diversity". You got your way. Congratulations.

Originally Posted by Guest

So perhaps you didn't read or take in the post on "Public Accommodation? If you are open to the PUBLIC you can't refuse service!

That's just a BS law made by politicians who steal from taxpayers and take graft for a living. A law doesn't make it "right". If I have a business, I should be able to choose my customer just as a customer can/doesn't choose me. You can think what you want, but to me a business owner doesn't become a slave with no choice when he hangs an open sign. And that's what you want. YOU get all the choices...they have to obey.

Originally Posted by Guest

Yes and yes.

A business SHOULD be able to refuse service to anyone he pleases. Why would he unless for a good reason? It hits his bottom line. But in the long run, maybe it IS in his best interest because of less problem customers. If YOU have a choice in which business to use, shouldn't the business also have a choice in it's customer?

I guess you don't know much about South Africa. It was a MUCH better place then than now.

Is This The End of South Africa? | The Truth About South Africa
70,000 Whites Murdered in
https://africacheck.org/reports/is-s...facebook-post/

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 includes a section on Public Accommodation. As well as the ADA in 1990.

There was a good example of this principle earlier in this thread.

But here is the lawsuit explanation:BORNE vs. HAVERHILL GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB, INC., 58 Mass. App. Ct. 306

But in a nutshell if you own a business that serves the PUBLIC then you cannot refuse service to the public.

Originally Posted by Guest

Unless the gov owns the bakery, it IS a private bakery. It is a privately owned business, is it not? I am sure that these owners will not be hurt too greatly by gays boycotting their bakeries.

And this is not JUST related to bakeries. It has to do with allowing cross dressing perverts into opposite gender restrooms. If gays want to boycott those states that want to accommodate the majority view, then I say "adios amigas." And don't let the speed limit hinder you when passing through the state.

Actually, no! You may own the business but if you hang a sign in the window OPEN then you must accept whoever walks through that door. If you are a photographer and you advertise in the yellow pages then you must accommodate the public....

So my partner and I invited our closest friends and family to a Sunday Brunch at a very fancy hotel for our 20th anniversary. We wanted a photographer to take pictures, I looked in the Yellow Pages and called the first person on the list. I explained what I wanted and when and asked if he was available. He said yes and then I said do you have any objections to gays. He said no and I hired him.

I wouldn't have wanted someone who didn't want to be there! Would you?