Media Adopt Double-Standard With Demands For Independent Review Of Clinton Email | Research | Media Matters for America


Every state department employee, whether they use the government server or other server, decides for themselves what emails to save.

Boy, I haven't seen a single coherent argument (from a self-avowed liberal) supporting Hildebeast's email scandal.

When the libs start abandoning the beast...she's REALLY in trouble. I bet one of these hackers find the goods on her and posts it somewhere - Wikileaks?

This stinks just like the "mysterious" discovery of the Rose Law Firm billing records on top of a file cabinet IN THE WHITE HOUSE (AFTER it had already been searched!)

It's amazing how two Arkansas idiots could possibly have risen as high as they have. Well, when you consider how many low information liberals there are it starts to become clear.

There's that GOP hate that keeps this country's government running so well. Unbelievable the mentality of some of these people, term used looely.

I'm sorry when I first skimmed this I thought you were referring to that unfortunate but widespread medical condition known as Liberal Rage. Elizabeth Warren or Howard Deaniac comes to mind.

In reading the link you cite, which is produced by genuine nutjob David Brock , it's amazing to see the long list of liberal media types now gunning for Hildebeast. I hope she can survive this ( for selfish reasons)

The policy is USG wide but does not allow employees to set up private servers in private bedrooms with the obvious intent of evading the law. This is not a complex topic -- She acted dishonestly and violated numerous laws.

Lou is here.

Lou seems to have a hang up on “old white men” … I’m starting to get more insights into his animus and resentments. I’m wondering if he’s transgendered or something as he seems angry.

If he isn't here he should be. The tea party wackos are here in force!

All the same ones that assured us, without a doubt, it would be a landslide victory for Mitt Romney in 2012.

Last time I checked, the subject of this thread is Hildebeast's qualifications to become president ... you guys keep changing the subject especially since her botched press conference

Removing the highlighted word turns it to be completely accurate.

An Open Letter to hdr22@clintonemail.com

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/03/15...?_r=0&referrer

In twitter burst, Hillary Clinton slams GOP for working


Hillary Clinton has taken on the GOP and the way they have handled the Loretta Lynch nomination to be attorney general. No other AG nominee in the history of this country has waited four months to be confirmed by the senate.

This is not a republican issue or a democratic issue, this is a civil rights issue, and it's time for women across the country to organize and demand better. We need marches from Maine to California, from Washington to Florida.

I think this is totally wrong (my opinion).
I think congress is stalling/taling it's time/call it what you will.....to assure we do not get another Holder/racist in the position.
It has nothning to do with the fact she is a woman.

And does anybody think Clinton is playing the gender card? It may be the only positive she has left in her dirty laundry bag of tricks.

The Right-Wing Media's Nonsense Attacks On Attorney General Nominee Loretta Lynch | Blog | Media Matters for America


Read these right wing media attacks against Federal Prosecutor Loretta Lynch. In several cases, these attacks are against a completely different Loretta Lynch. So much for getting the facts correct.

So it's not a gender issue, it's a race issue? Do you really want to go there?

And who thinks women's health issues are a game of cards? Who will be more supportive of women's health issues and a woman's right to choose? Certainly not some republican man.

It's time for women to organize and march again like it is the 1960's all over again.

Hillwery
 

Can't believe the voters could be so stubie.

Hillery
 

I cannot the voters could be so stupid. The other half will vote for their pocket and not is what is good for the countey.

OK so March like they did in the 60'S.
But at a minimum find a leader who represents the women.

And that most certainly is not Hillary Clinton. She is in it for one woman......herself.

There are much, MUCH better choices than a self centered past her prime, past her time political business as usual .....did I mention self centered?

Poll: Hillary Clinton still tops in 2016 - CNN.com


It's no exaggeration to say Hillary crushes every possible GOP opponent in this latest CNN poll, and the poll was taken after the email 'scandal'.

Ah yes the polls games.

Some of us remember when she was also crushing all the other candidates in 2007? And then dethroned by a virtual unknown on the national political stage?

She is the poster child for yesterday (damaged goods). And the gold standard for politics as usual.

There will eventually be enough skeleton rattling from the past to dethrone her again.

...and the Republican candidate of (insert any name) will be able to win the presidency over Sec. Clinton?

That's only a possibility if she actually wins the nomination. And if she wins the nomination, all I have to say is, seriously, that's all you got?? How many years has this been going on and that's all you got?? There's actually no one else in the whole Democratic party that isn't as qualified or more qualified than her? Oh, I guess not, considering a virtual unknown, totally unqualified candidate beat her out the last time!! Now, either something is really messed up in the Democratic Party, or someone else is pulling all the strings.......which is it?

I'm thinking that the perfect ticket for the dems, Clinton and Warren. That will set your pacemakers and tea party zealots a twitter!

Too bad you can't respond to real questions, and offer real solutions or better ideas that will address ALL of America instead of your insular little circle.

Changing subjects....again.
Reminder: the subject is Clinton crushing all other candidates.....NOT... about who could beat her.

All the current rhetoric from 2007 sounds like it is being replayed again now.
What I would like to hear from such a staunch, cock sure Clinton supporter is....how did she get bumped out of a similar shoe in candidate to losing the nomination in the 2008 election.

How and why did her loyal followers switch hats over night and choose a completely unqualified, unknown candidate and pass on all the hyped charisma, female, Clinton dynasty, Washington insider pre-ordained party choice????

She certainly has not added anything of consequence to her resume' since 2008.
Quite the contrary only more shady dealings than ever.

The tightly contested democratic primary of 2007/2008 went on from Feb 2007, when Barack Obama announced his candidacy, until June 2008, when Hilary Clinton conceded defeat as the democratic nominee. That's hardly what you would call 'switching hats over night'.

As you might recall, Hilary won all the big states ie: California, Pennsylvania, Ohio, etc etc. It is still hard to figure out how Barack Obama beat her except he just kept plugging away, especially in the caucus states which she essentially ignored.

The 2016 contest will be about issues and not about personalities, and the winner will be the one who supports a woman's right to choose, the one who supports healthcare for all, the one who supports the voting rights act, the one who doesn't think that employers should decide what type of birth control a woman uses (or if she should even use birth control), if state mandated vaginal-probes are used, if the minimum wage is raised, if equal pay for equal work is the law, if violence against women is allowed, and many other equal rights issues.

Until the GOP wants to embrace these issues, they are looking at obscurity.

The two things I take away from the above.
One. Hillary went from the presumed democratic nominee to getting beat by a near unknown, unqualified candidate that knew how to make speeches and promises.

Two. Only democrats have the issues identified and addressed.

We will have to wait and see as 2016 approaches.

Apparently this strange assemblage of concerns is important to you, but I hardly think most of your concerns are shared by more than a handful.

Healthcare is available to all. Simply sign up and pay the premium.

Voting - both sides agree

Birth Control - who knows what you're talking about? Hobby Lobby?

Vaginal-probes? Has to be a joke...???

Min wage raise - if $15/hr is good, why not really raise the poor out of poverty and raise it to $150/hr?

Equal pay for equal work - of course! Proven MYTH women earn less.

Violence against women? - LOL... um who's for beating women? Really?

Abortion - that's about the ONLY valid policy disagreement between parties. Think we're up to about 22 MILLION abortions since Roe v. Wade - CONGRATS!

These two GOP candidates appear to be doomed.

https://youtu.be/fKJ1LNwtAcI

Well you're correct about the "totally unqualified candidate" who beat out Mrs Clinton ... and he has since indeed proven to be totally unqualified in myriad of ways

:BigApplause:

Poll: Hillary Clinton still tops in 2016 - CNN.com


This is so amusing. Hillary Clinton is the worst candidate ever, and yet she trounces every possible GOP contender by at least 10% points. What does that say about the GOP candidates?

I know, I know the polls are skewed just like they were on election night 2012 when Mitt Romney believed he would win right up until the polls closed, based on his internal polling. Even then, Karl Rove was running around Fox News yelling "no, no this can't be happening". Who will ever forget that night?

How can we forget THAT night when we are reminded evry day since what a horrible :swear: outcome. The nobody pied piper sucked in millions not once but twice. How can there be so many :censored::censored: gullible people?

That's easy ... continued illegal immigration, continued race baiting and making blacks perpetually dependent upon the democrat party and periodic hysteria that single women often buy into

And this is from the party that gave us George Bush and Dick Cheney and 9/11, the Iraq war, 10% unemployment, total collapse of the financial markets, and the party that thinks Sarah Palin could be president. You betcha.

The good news for you folks is that Donald Trump announced today that he is forming an exploratory committee to gear up for a run for president in 2016.

I agree. Some people can't seem to stand peace and prosperity.

Republicans just alienated Hispanics, African Americans, and women in one single post!