Originally Posted by Guest

First of all, it is truly mindless to vote for anyone simply because of their gender.

Second, it's always amused me how liberals seem to love mindless slogans ... "Women of America unite!" ... give us a break

Guess your right, it's a lot like that " we the people" your tea party extremists throw out there.. Sure am glad there are more women than tea party nut jobs!

It seems that the game plan for left wingers is to call people names. Don't you get it: it reflects on you, and in not a good way.

Originally Posted by Guest

Guess your right, it's a lot like that " we the people" your tea party extremists throw out there.. Sure am glad there are more women than tea party nut jobs!

Originally Posted by Guest

Guess your right, it's a lot like that " we the people" your tea party extremists throw out there.. Sure am glad there are more women than tea party nut jobs!

Snarl, spit and call names ... plus you missed the point, as usual.

For those that feel strongly against Hillary Clinton, here's a suggestion: Don't vote for her. In the meantime, Clinton is busy opening up headquarters in all fifty states. She is getting ready to run the table.

Hopefully, the GOP will find a candidate to challenge her, or not.

Originally Posted by Guest

For those that feel strongly against Hillary Clinton, here's a suggestion: Don't vote for her. In the meantime, Clinton is busy opening up headquarters in all fifty states. She is getting ready to run the table.

Hopefully, the GOP will find a candidate to challenge her, or not.

You make an excellent suggestion.

Regarding her running the table, I have to agree with you. The smart money would bet on Hillary, and heavily.

In fact, it's an obvious bet ... one doesn't' even have to think about it betting on Hillary. Like, for example, one would have bet heavily on the Persians vs the Greeks in the 5th century BC, or on the British against the Americans in 1776.

What was the bet for the 2008 election?
Somehow that done deal never gets addressed.
You can't mean the USA was more ready for a black than a woman. An unknown from the back of the pack ran her off the table.
Easy then. Easier now!

Originally Posted by Guest

What was the bet for the 2008 election?
Somehow that done deal never gets addressed.
You can't mean the USA was more ready for a black than a woman. An unknown from the back of the pack ran her off the table.
Easy then. Easier now!

Obama vs. Clinton: Two Different Polls


As far back as shortly after Barack Obama announced his candidacy, he was leading Hillary Clinton in the polls by as little as 47-45 to as much as 51-39.
This was a full 11 months before the first votes were counted in the Iowa caucus, where he came in first, with John Edwards second, and Clinton third.

After Obama won that first contest, he could no longer be considered an "unknown from the back of the pack" or a dark horse as some affectionately like to call him.

Amazing that the statistics show the posts on this forum are basically from 8 different people.

Darwin was right - the herd needs thinning.

Why Do So Many People Hate the Sound of Hillary Clinton's Voice? | The New Republic

Hillary's voice was mentioned earlier .... this article is interesting and talks about a number of political figures' voices

"You know Hillary Clinton’s voice, right? I mean, you know it. It’s just so loud and annoying. Or maybe it's like a nagging wife. Or inauthentic—that phony Southern accent! Those flat Midwestern vowels! Whatever it is, her voice is burned into your brain."

Originally Posted by Guest

Why Do So Many People Hate the Sound of Hillary Clinton's Voice? | The New Republic

Hillary's voice was mentioned earlier .... this article is interesting and talks about a number of political figures' voices

"You know Hillary Clinton’s voice, right? I mean, you know it. It’s just so loud and annoying. Or maybe it's like a nagging wife. Or inauthentic—that phony Southern accent! Those flat Midwestern vowels! Whatever it is, her voice is burned into your brain."

Whole lot better than the New York or Boston accents that you hear screeching in The Villages just about everywhere you go.

I have found out that a relationship works out better with a sock stuffed in her mouth. I told her it was sexy and she is dumb enough to believe it.

As long as it keeps her happy and she keeps paying for me when we go out, it works for me.

Originally Posted by Guest

Whole lot better than the New York or Boston accents that you hear screeching in The Villages just about everywhere you go.

I have found out that a relationship works out better with a sock stuffed in her mouth. I told her it was sexy and she is dumb enough to believe it.

As long as it keeps her happy and she keeps paying for me when we go out, it works for me.

I have to admit, your response caused me to laugh out loud and almost spill my wine

Originally Posted by Guest

Whole lot better than the New York or Boston accents that you hear screeching in The Villages just about everywhere you go.

I have found out that a relationship works out better with a sock stuffed in her mouth. I told her it was sexy and she is dumb enough to believe it.

As long as it keeps her happy and she keeps paying for me when we go out, it works for me.

I hear you, bro. You definitely got a handle on the situation. Nothing worse than the Queens NY "Fran Drescher" accent. Guess I have to make a stop at Market of Marion for a supply of tube socks!

Wal-Mart is experiencing an unprecedented run on the sale of tube socks today!

Originally Posted by Guest

Amazing that the statistics show the posts on this forum are basically from 8 different people.

Darwin was right - the herd needs thinning.

How about sharing the source of and what the statisitics are?

Originally Posted by Guest

How about sharing the source of and what the statisitics are?

I am not doing your research for you. Sorry.