SO, you criticize anyone that watches FOX news but don't watch it? Interesting, but very disingenuous. Your credibility is questionable. But, if you wish to play the fictitious liberal character and disparage others, that's your game and pastime. Have a great day in your imaginative world.

Yes, of course...wink...wink...

SO, you criticize anyone that watches FOX news but don't watch it?
You have me mixed up with someone else.
I never criticized anyone and I said I use Fox online.FOX NOW | Watch FOX Shows Online

Interesting, but very disingenuous. Your credibility is questionable.
As if that matters to me. no offense


But, if you wish to play the fictitious liberal character and disparage others, that's your game and pastime. Have a great day in your imaginative world.

I always answer honestly. If I say something I later regret I post that too and apologise. It's not a game. I learned a long time ago that it's just plain practical and feels good to always tell the truth. A liar needs a good memory. All these alzheimers jokes bother me a little. I lost both parents to that disease so I better write while I can for as long as I can.

If this is true, then why did you answer for someone else? And I have never used the word "Alzheimer" in any of my posts.

You appear to be a bit confused. See post #31

Correction: Make that post #131.

First of all I never said you used the word alzheimer's. I don't know who anyone is, except for 2 women, Chi and Red. And why would I lie?

Like I said before, why did you answer for someone else? See post #131. Hope that alleviates your confusion.

FOX cable network thanks "you liberals" for consistently viewing their channel, making FOX the number one cable news network in the Country. If not for all those liberals watching, it would have been impossible for that ranking. Of course, it is the only and easiest means for liberals to keep up to date on current events. By the way, FOX gets most of their news from AP, so if you have a problem with their material, you can start your criticism there.

I thought when you said "you liberals" that's what you meant. "You" can mean 1 person or it could mean many. That's why everyone is called Guest. Every Guest gets to answer. If you want a private conversation go to the other part of TOTV.

HBO's Bill Mahr is my favorite! He tells it like it is - uncensored!

He tells it like he wants it to come across for entertainment.
Telling it like it is....is a relative, subjective perspective at best.

Let me type this real slowly so that you can get it. That was meant to be derisive, in case you didn't get it. YOU, not them, just you. I responded to a comment. Did you not read the comment I responded to? If you can't understand that, or refuse to understand it, or refuse to admit you understand it, that is your personal problem. The person I responded to, obviously watches FOX, according to his/her comment. If not you, I have no idea why you would inject yourself into and take offense to the response. But, if you prefer to take every response as a personal affront, that is your personal problem. If you wish to continue to bash your head against a brick wall and then question why you feel pain, go for it. If the conversation is too difficult to follow, then feel free to find your entertainment elsewhere. I guarantee no one is going to ask where you disappeared to.

He doesn't even believe half the stuff he spouts. If you caught him off camera, he is a different person, with a different personality. So, if you really think that he says it like it is, then he has succeeded in convincing you. But, and I do enjoy saying it, liberals are easily con'd.

:agree:

Let me type this real slowly so that you can get it.
You can type as slow as you want, I'm going to read it at my regular speed. Talking slowly is probably what you meant.




That was meant to be derisive, in case you didn't get it.
It wasn't and I got it.

YOU, not them, just you.
That I don't understand. It's not even a sentence.


I responded to a comment. Did you not read the comment I responded to?
I did


If you can't understand that, or refuse to understand it, or refuse to admit you understand it, that is your personal problem.
You responded to liberals. Maybe you didn't mean. That I understand and I do have problems but this is not my problem.

The person I responded to, obviously watches FOX, according to his/her comment.
As do I, on-line. Follow the link
https://www.google.com/search?q=fox+...w=1242&bih=585

If not you, I have no idea why you would inject yourself into and take offense to the response.
I was not offend. Who cares who watches Fox. That was my point.

But, if you prefer to take every response as a personal affront, that is your personal problem.
Once again, it's not my problem.


If you wish to continue to bash your head against a brick wall and then question why you feel pain, go for it.
I know it's a metaphor. And if you mean why do I waste my time writing, it's valid question.

If the conversation is too difficult to follow, then feel free to find your entertainment elsewhere.
It's very easy to follow. Especially if I address each point, one point at a time.

I guarantee no one is going to ask where you disappeared to
Since we are all guests how would they know if I disappeared. For all I know each one of the posts can be coming from a different person. And who cares if that's true? How can you take anything personal when you don't know who you are talking to? You could be my 65 year old sister from Maryland. That would be funny if it was true. I'll bring it up Christmas.