Polar Bears, Dead Coral and Other Climate Fictions

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #76  
Old 08-09-2024, 10:16 AM
fdpaq0580 fdpaq0580 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,926
Thanks: 355
Thanked 5,048 Times in 2,146 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sounding View Post
Making climate claims is fun, but delivering data is the scientific way. So, according to your global warming equation ... how much did "man-made" CO2 warm the earth last year?
That same old saw? This time, for a change, why don't you do the research and just give us your finding instead of asking for others here to do it for you, over and over and over. I gave you the answer once, and you keep asking.
  #77  
Old 08-09-2024, 10:40 AM
sounding sounding is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Calumet Grove
Posts: 1,289
Thanks: 734
Thanked 1,015 Times in 635 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fdpaq0580 View Post
That same old saw? This time, for a change, why don't you do the research and just give us your finding instead of asking for others here to do it for you, over and over and over. I gave you the answer once, and you keep asking.
In a civil society, the accuser has the burden of proof. I did not say man-made CO2 harms our climate - you did. You gave an answer, but without the science of how it was produced. Guessing, like palm reading, is fun, but the scientific method is preferred. Remember, our climate leaders keep telling us to follow the science. So, please show us the science you used to arrive at your answer.
  #78  
Old 08-09-2024, 10:42 AM
fdpaq0580 fdpaq0580 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,926
Thanks: 355
Thanked 5,048 Times in 2,146 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles View Post
Well, you've challenged him with that question at least 3 dozen times and have received crickets in return. The true believers don't care about the facts, only following their propaganda masters talking points. They fail to realize that their masters have a significant monetary agenda that they are pursuing. The sad part is that those masters simply consider their followers "useful idiots".
Way more than 3 dozen times. And not just me. Crickets? Because it is a stupid question and we all know that it is. And it's a red herring to divert the dialog with meaningless nonsense.
Also, I did give him a answer! The, he wanted my research. If I can do the work, he can too. Don't cheat off my answer sheet.
And, as far as "useful idiots" is concerned, that is just what some guy said about his followers at some gathering recently. But that is for another time and place.
I think we can expect to see the CO2 question again and again in the future.
Have a great trip! 🙂🙂🙂
  #79  
Old 08-09-2024, 10:53 AM
sounding sounding is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Calumet Grove
Posts: 1,289
Thanks: 734
Thanked 1,015 Times in 635 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles View Post
Well, you've challenged him with that question at least 3 dozen times and have received crickets in return. The true believers don't care about the facts, only following their propaganda masters talking points. They fail to realize that their masters have a significant monetary agenda that they are pursuing. The sad part is that those masters simply consider their followers "useful idiots".
I have asked this question well over 1,000 times over the past 2 years -- on YouTube, Twitter, and now X -- and while I've received numerous responses (guesses), no one has ever been able to provide the "science" which defines GHG warming - even though the UN's IPCC uses this science in all their climate models. The media leadership knows the answer, but they refuse to print the story - because it destroys the climate narrative and exposes the climate scam. This "science" is discussed at the Weather Club, and is frequently presented in "CO2 Coalition" articles.
  #80  
Old 08-09-2024, 10:55 AM
fdpaq0580 fdpaq0580 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,926
Thanks: 355
Thanked 5,048 Times in 2,146 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sounding View Post
In a civil society, the accuser has the burden of proof. I did not say man-made CO2 harms our climate - you did. You gave an answer, but without the science of how it was produced. Guessing, like palm reading, is fun, but the scientific method is preferred. Remember, our climate leaders keep telling us to follow the science. So, please show us the science you used to arrive at your answer.
The work is there for all to see. Just follow real science and you will find it. People who work for things appreciate it more than those who are given things. You can read the journals as easy as I. For your own good you must do the work. Our you can continue ridicule, doubt and deny and trust your magic 8 ball or guru
Wishing you success.
  #81  
Old 08-09-2024, 10:59 AM
JMintzer JMintzer is offline
Sage
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Where Eagles Dare to Soar...
Posts: 11,870
Thanks: 486
Thanked 8,945 Times in 4,690 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fdpaq0580 View Post
The work is there for all to see. Just follow real science and you will find it. People who work for things appreciate it more than those who are given things. You can read the journals as easy as I. For your own good you must do the work. Our you can continue ridicule, doubt and deny and trust your magic 8 ball or guru
Wishing you success.
Yes, the "real science" that you happen to agree with...
  #82  
Old 08-09-2024, 10:59 AM
sounding sounding is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Calumet Grove
Posts: 1,289
Thanks: 734
Thanked 1,015 Times in 635 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fdpaq0580 View Post
The work is there for all to see. Just follow real science and you will find it. People who work for things appreciate it more than those who are given things. You can read the journals as easy as I. For your own good you must do the work. Our you can continue ridicule, doubt and deny and trust your magic 8 ball or guru
Wishing you success.
Hand-waving is not science. If your number was produced by real science, please provide that scientific method you used.
  #83  
Old 08-09-2024, 11:08 AM
golfing eagles's Avatar
golfing eagles golfing eagles is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: The Villages
Posts: 13,444
Thanks: 1,208
Thanked 14,484 Times in 4,771 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fdpaq0580 View Post
The work is there for all to see. Just follow real science and you will find it. People who work for things appreciate it more than those who are given things. You can read the journals as easy as I. For your own good you must do the work. Our you can continue ridicule, doubt and deny and trust your magic 8 ball or guru
Wishing you success.
A famous person once quipped “The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it”. His first name was Adolph.
  #84  
Old 08-09-2024, 11:27 AM
Taltarzac725's Avatar
Taltarzac725 Taltarzac725 is online now
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 51,611
Thanks: 10,947
Thanked 4,015 Times in 2,424 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles View Post
A famous person once quipped “The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it”. His first name was Adolph.
He had an audience of extremely gullible people who believed they were chosen by destiny to lead for a thousand years, etc. And his detractors were often murdered.

There were not many voices questioning that man. And if someone did they would be on the next train to oblivion.
  #85  
Old 08-09-2024, 11:33 AM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is online now
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 6,872
Thanks: 2,111
Thanked 7,292 Times in 2,850 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fdpaq0580 View Post
The work is there for all to see. Just follow real science and you will find it. People who work for things appreciate it more than those who are given things. You can read the journals as easy as I. For your own good you must do the work. Our you can continue ridicule, doubt and deny and trust your magic 8 ball or guru
Wishing you success.
Good luck, and I mean that sincerely. I tried for a while but gave up some time ago.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough
Closed Thread

Tags
polar, fresh, past, hear, claims

Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 AM.