[Keefelane66]

Originally Posted by sounding

Whatever. So why are so many glaciers growing?

7 years or going on 9 It's about being factual, mistake or made-up information try to stay on tract.

We'll talk about glaciers someday but no now.

[sounding]

Originally Posted by Keefelane66

7 years or going on 9 It's about being factual, mistake or made-up information try to stay on tract.

We'll talk about glaciers someday but no now.

Here's the data. You can make up your graph. https://www.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v...cdc_lt_6.0.txt

[Bill14564]

Originally Posted by sounding

Whatever. So why are so many glaciers growing?

What were the numbers again, 100 growing out of 200,000 total? And is the Hubbard glacier growing? I thought a post on another thread said it had receded miles (I haven’t looked that up yet)

EDIT: The Hubbard glacier *is* advancing according to the sources I could find. It must have been a different glacier mention that other thread.

[sounding]

Originally Posted by Bill14564

What were the numbers again, 100 growing out of 200,000 total? And is the Hubbard glacier growing? I thought a post on another thread said it had receded miles (I haven’t looked that up yet)

The media does not willingly report it, because you're not supposed to know it's growing. Also, guess why the Glacier National Park stopped reporting on glacier status after 2020? The whole "man-made" climate narrative is a scam.

[Bill14564]

Originally Posted by sounding

The media does not willingly report it, because you're not supposed to know it's growing. Also, guess why the Glacier National Park stopped reporting on glacier status after 2020? The whole "man-made" climate narrative is a scam.

We talked about GNP before too. It looks like they *never* reported status. A researcher compiled the information for his paper but GNP didn’t report it. Once he was done with his paper he had no need to gather more info. It *would*be interesting to see what a follow up would reveal.

TLDR; GNP did not stop reporting, they never reported in the first place

[sounding]

Originally Posted by Bill14564

We talked about GNP before too. It looks like they *never* reported status. A researcher compiled the information for his paper but GNP didn’t report it. Once he was done with his paper he had no need to gather more info. It *would*be interesting to see what a follow up would reveal.

TLDR; GNP did not stop reporting, they never reported in the first place

Not true ... see atch image. They stopped reporting when it was obvious the climate was no longer warming -- and it was embarrassing to report growing glaciers. Believe me, if they were melting, they would certainly report it and claim global disaster - just like everything else. There is no climate change crisis - just a climate education crisis.

[Bill14564]

Originally Posted by sounding

Not true ... see atch image. They stopped reporting when it was obvious the climate was no longer warming -- and it was embarrassing to report growing glaciers. Believe me, if they were melting, they would certainly report it and claim global disaster - just like everything else. There is no climate change crisis - just a climate education crisis.

Yep, the dates from the research paper, just as I wrote.

[threeonemiles@outlook.com]

Yesterday morning, it rained. The sun came out but sometime later, it rained again. Isn't that climate change?

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by threeonemiles@outlook.com

Yesterday morning, it rained. The sun came out but sometime later, it rained again. Isn't that climate change?

NO! That is local weather.