![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So, what happens if there is a mutation, in your body, that your immune system doesn't recognize? Well, it will not get killed. The problem is what happens next. I don't know. I am not an expert. But, think about this. Every year most (many?) people get influenza vaccinations. So, why are we not all dead from mutated mega influenza viruses resulting from being vaccinated? Every year millions of children get vaccinated against various viruses. Why aren't we all dead from polio, chickenpox, etc. as a result of a mega monster mutating because of the vaccinations? So, who do we believe, a Vet that says our entire immune system has been destroyed if we got vaccinated (which means EVERYONE that has been vaccinated will soon be DEAD - you can't live without an immune system outside of a sterile bubble). Or scientists that have worked their entire lives in this field, and have minor achievements like eradicating polio, chickenpox, measle, et al. Inquiring minds want to know... |
Quote:
Actually, no maybes about it. Those are actual reasons why. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
So thank God, even with all the whiners that say the government can't make me do it... The people/business's have spoken...you do the right thing....or get out.....FINALLY!!!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You don't know me to paint me with such a broad brush. |
Quote:
There are 13 documented occurrences of this on various other viruses. They used a polybasic furin cleavage site with a proline, two arginines and an Alanine. PRRA. PRRA has high affinity for human tissues which is why it is a good insert for gain of function. PRRA is not found in animal models like bats, pangolins or most of everything that isn't humanized because their systems don't code for a protease like humans do. There are no bat ancestor genomes with a polybasic furin cleavage site with PRRA. In fact, that probably would not occur in nature because it would make it harder for the virus to propagate in bat tissues. Sars-Cov2 has a polybasic furin cleavage site PRRA. Is that proof it came from a lab? without someone admitting they did that, no, not exactly. It's a smoking gun though. It is the exact sequence used in gain of function. We know bat genomes were used at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. We know the Bat lady, Shi was using that exact sequence in gain of function research. When you are in North America and you hear hoofbeats, you don't think zebras. |
Quote:
All this new study has done is create more uncertainty, confusion and distrust. Now the unvaccinated think, "why bother getting vaccinated if my old auntie is fully vaxxed and still got it anyway?" |
Quote:
But, just my opinion, and you are right I don't know you at all, so I can only speak to what I read here. You could be the most positive upbeat person in TV as far as I know. |
Quote:
I will still trust the experts that actually work in the field of pandemics (on humans) over some stranger on the internet that says every one of the experts is wrong. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Please provide proof that he wants to paint you at all. Please provide proof that he has a brush. Your turn. |
Quote:
The veterinarian who wrote his treatise warning against the vaccine - if you were actually paying attention around the time that was written - was mostly referring to the concept that in order for a vaccine against COVID-19 to be effective, MOST people need to be vaccinated. There was no way to develop, AND test, AND manufacture, AND distribute a vaccine for COVID-19 in time for "most" people to be immunized. That meant the virus would have had a LOT of time to mutate. He was absolutely spot-on right, in that. But it wasn't because people COULDN'T vaccinate in time. It's because they CHOSE not to vaccinate in time. The warnings were coming from everywhere - you get vaccinated as soon as you are eligible, as soon as the vaccine is available to you. If you don't, the virus can mutate. Too many people said "screw that, I'll take my chances." And the virus did EXACTLY as predicted: it mutated. If people took the "herd immunity" concept more seriously THEN, the virus wouldn't have had the opportunity to mutate NOW. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And by "by their peers" I am intentionally excluding people whose opinions of those scientists have no relevance. What a Tucker or Hannity or whoever is on CNN or main-stream-media or some alt-right or anarchy conspiracy website or Dr. Oz or even our President feels about a scientist is not relevant. I don't care about their feelings about science. I care about the respected opinions of respected scientists, about other respected scientists. In other words, I believe in science, not editorials. |
Quote:
The Chinese were present when they did the gain of function research at Univ. of North Carolina lab where they successfully infected HeLa cells (human cells) with horseshoe bat coronavirus. So the Chinese just continued on with it in Wuhan, along with other bioweapons research. Although virus escapes have happened, this was no accident. Not with the timing of it and then the elaborate cover up and lies by the Chinese. As late as mid-January, at least two months after the first COVID case, knowing full well what was happening in their country they still permitted travel abroad. Nice "business partners", eh? |
Round and round we go... back to bioweapons
|
Quote:
|
I see we hit a new record in Florida - 21,000 cases.
For those that like to use common sense, what does getting a record number of cases while performing half as many tests imply? (We are down from 90,000 tests to 48,000 tests per day) |
The seven-day average Vaccines administered are up 26% over the past 3 weeks, according to headlines today. Some states are over double in the past three weeks.
This is good news. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The other news is vaccination rate is up, people are taking action and getting vaccinations, so you may be right. |
Quote:
Hanlon's razor is appropriate here. "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity". I think of the leak as stupidity and poor controls. I think the coverup was malice. Not stopping international flights out of Wuhan, but stopping domestic flights? Malice. Taking the viral database offline? Malice. Lying to the WHO, Malice. Showing videos of people falling over in the street? Malice. etc. They knew exactly where this came from and who did it and have spared no lives in making sure no one else figures it out. The problem with that is the genome is hard science. You can't fudge it, it's testable out of their control. Now that it's passed to animals, they will probably deflect and suggest that the animal reservoirs were the source, rather than the other way around. White tail deer in Michigan? I read an article on that yesterday but I haven't run it down. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's what's happened with this vaccine and the virus. Wall = refusal to vaccinate. Door = the vaccine. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
news observer article Notice that this article doesn't make fun of, disparage, or even address the people themselves. It is an explanation of the actual science, the facts themselves. No accusations that one side is smarter/dumber than the other. No "what abouts." Just simple easy to understand information. |
EUA Revoked for PCR test?
The CDC announced they will revoke the emergency use authorization of the PCR tests first introduced in February of 2020.
"CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS CoV-2 and influenza viruses." Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing So, does this mean that the PCR test that was used during the "pandemic" could not differentiate between Sars CoV-2 and influenza? |
Quote:
We need to stop with the ridiculous attempts to find someone to blame other than the 40%ish of the country who have refused to get the vaccination. They are the ones predominately getting sick and filling the hospitals. They are the ones predominately spreading the virus. They are the ones who are driving the "need" for the new mask mandates. They, the unvaccinated, are the primary reason the virus is still spreading. Talking about the border is a distraction or a deflection - deal with the problem at hand. Yes, there are some who legitimately cannot be vaccinated. Their need for special protection is due to the vaccine refusers as well. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.