Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
#16
|
||
|
||
Quote:
I found out this morning, that the "Golf Professionals" seem to be the ones who oversee the renovation of the Executive Golf Courses. ( I downloaded a copy of the Bid Package for Pimlico & Pelican today). Not to disparage the Golf Professional Staff in TV, but many of them were "Asst. Professionals" until TV elevated their stature to "Head Pros" and .... they're golf guys, not construction people. I'm not sure having a golf pro oversee a $1,000,000 - $1,500,000 construction project, is prudent. Also, there doesn't seem to be any provisions in the Bid Package, for "3rd Party Verifications" (there is some mention of CEC over-sight) nor are there construction specifications for the Greens , Tees & Bunkers (replace what was there, isn't a "construction standard"). There are 62 Pages in the Bid Documents. Only 3 pages relate to the actual construction, standards and specifications for the 2 courses. There are 55+ pages of technical requirements, as to ethics, insurance, billing, payments, etc. There are no construction plans, survey plans, engineering plans nor even a drawing of the original golf course that they're supposed to replicate. No elevations nor topographical information. No grading requirements (other than "keep it the same"). "remove clumpy material in preparation for grassing" is not a design specification nor an acceptable construction standard. "Install 4 to 6 + inches of granite drain rock (USGA spec) completely covering the greens floor and drain lines. "Granite drain rock" is not a USGA spec, I believe it's a proprietary product, from a particular quarry and typically use for "top dressing". "Install 12 to 14 + inches of 85/15 greens sand mix (USGA spec -must provide analysis test before installing) in the green’s cavity over drainage rock" The USGA doesn't provide a single "spec", it provides 28 pages of recommendations, that vary for different situations. Not a single sentence in the entire Bid Package, includes the words: "must be constructed pursuant to USGA recommendations (or standards)". In the entire bid, ONE sentence is dedicated to establishing the quality of the work. It says: "WORK STANDARDS: Contractor shall perform all work using the latest industry best practices and standards as applicable to this work." At the meeting of the Advisory Committee 3 weeks ago, when renovation of the Executive Courses was discussed, we were told that the Greens and Bunkers are all per USGA spec. That is not what the Bid requires. As a matter of fact, the Bid never mentions any USGA publications or recommendations for the construction of Greens/Bunkers/Fairways. If my Landscape Architect designed a landscape plan for my 600 sq. ft. front yard, they'd be more detail, than the entire bid package for Executive Golf Course Renovation. **** I could be wrong about this part, but I don't think so. The Bid requires "Unit Pricing" for almost every aspect of the job. In other words, it estimates certain job functions such as #1 "All Greens to be sod stripped ...." This quantity is estimated at 50,000 sq. ft. If the actual quantity exceeds 50,000 sq. ft., there are provision for the contractor to submit a Change Order for increased costs. If the quantity is less than 50,000 sq. ft., the District doesn't get a price reduction. If anyone is interested, you can download the USGA 2018 revisions for putting green construction, from here: MSU Libraries (Redirecting...) › tic › usgamisc › monos › 2018recommendationsmethodputtinggreen.pdf Last edited by BrianL99; 05-06-2024 at 06:08 PM. |
|
#17
|
||
|
||
Quote:
__________________
If you see something that’s not right, say something. |
#18
|
||
|
||
Quote:
|
#20
|
||
|
||
Quote:
__________________
If you see something that’s not right, say something. |
#21
|
||
|
||
I had to email the "Contract Officer" first, to find out where it was available ... I wasn't smart enough to find it on my own (or too lazy to look).
It's right here: Current and Archived Solicitations I'm just about done with my letter to the Districts Reps, but like the last one I sent, it will surely just go in the circular file. The Bid Documents are a joke. I did Military Design/Build work for a while. I know what Bid Documents & Contracts are supposed to look like ... & these aren't them. (I was involved with 3 USAF "Officer Housing" projects at Hanscom Field ... we won "Housing Contractor of the Year" from the Air Force for one of our Scott Circle projects.) Last edited by BrianL99; 05-06-2024 at 06:00 PM. |
#22
|
||
|
||
Quote:
Interesting campus at Hanscom |
#23
|
||
|
||
Dealing with the USAF is an experience, although no where near as bad as doing an Army Corps of Engineers' job. Did one of those in Hudson.
Last edited by BrianL99; 05-06-2024 at 06:25 PM. |
#24
|
||
|
||
It's frustrating in general all of the things that aren't available on the golf website that would be available on 90+% of other places like:
Anyone's contact info/email address Golf range rates Group or Private lesson rates Championship course twilight info Individual yardages for each hole of a given course Course rating/slope rating for each course |
#25
|
||
|
||
Quote:
|
#26
|
||
|
||
I know there's a bunch of links on that site that are buried but I've never been able to find private lesson rates listed, or contact emails for specific people. The instructor page simply has a bio for each person.
|
#27
|
||
|
||
Quote:
I had one experience with the Learning Center at Sarasota and never again. I'm owed a 60 minute lesson, but I'd rather shoot 110 then go back there. Some of the Instructors are ok, but the staff and management are awful. Most every employee of the The Villages and District are unfailingly polite and accommodating if they can be ... Sarasota is an exception to the rule. |
#28
|
||
|
||
Apparently, residents cannot send email to the Project Wide Advisory Committee, either.
Last edited by BrianL99; 05-07-2024 at 08:51 AM. |
#29
|
||
|
||
Love 2024 transparency. If anything is this hard to find....it’s by design.
|
#30
|
||
|
||
Quote:
I posted a screen shot of the message I got back, but it doesn't seem to be showing up: "The group PWACBOARD only accepts messages from people in its organization or on its allowed senders list, and your email address isn't on the list". |
Reply |
|
|